[Bug binutils/5099] Missing apostrophe in bfd-2.17.90.pot

2007-10-04 Thread nickc at redhat dot com

--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com  2007-10-04 13:41 
---
Apostrophe added.

-- 
   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution||FIXED


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5099

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils


[Bug binutils/5100] Spelling fix for too in opcodes-2.17.90.pot

2007-10-04 Thread nickc at redhat dot com

--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com  2007-10-04 13:43 
---
Spelling correction checked in.

-- 
   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution||FIXED


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5100

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils


[Bug ld/5097] Spelling fix for cannot

2007-10-04 Thread nickc at redhat dot com

--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com  2007-10-04 13:36 
---
Spelling correction checked in.

-- 
   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution||FIXED


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5097

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils


[Bug binutils/5098] Spelling fix for ordinals

2007-10-04 Thread nickc at redhat dot com

--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com  2007-10-04 13:38 
---
Spelling correction checked in.

-- 
   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution||FIXED


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5098

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils


[Bug ld/4844] auto-import and const data import problem

2007-10-04 Thread nickc at redhat dot com

--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com  2007-10-04 13:57 
---
Hi Eric,

  OK, I have checked in the revised warning message patch.  If it turns out that
too many users are tripped up by this problem then we can reconsider enabling
the move-constant-data-into-.data-section feature by default.

Cheers
  Nick

ld/ChangeLog
2007-10-04  Nick Clifton  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

PR linker/4844
* emultempl/pep.em (pep_find_data_imports): Issue a warning
message if auto importing is triggered without
--enable-auto-import having been specified on the command line.
* emultempl/pe.em (pe_find_data_imports): Likewise.


-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4844

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils


Re: [Bug ld/4988] [2.18/HEAD regression] Assertion failures in ld

2007-10-04 Thread Nick Clifton

Hi Julien,

  Thanks for the extra libraries.  My attempt to build the simph323 binary 
gets further now, but it still fails with some missing libaries (and a missing 
loader).  Note - I do not have a mips-linux system available to me so I am 
building the binary using a cross-hosted mipsel-linux-gnu toolchain on an 
x86_64 host.


  The missing files are:

 libcrypt.so.1
 libgnutls.so.13
 ld.so.1
 libz.so.1
 libasound.so.2
 libdirectfb-0.9.so.25
 libfusion-0.9.so.25
 libdirect-0.9.so.25

  Plus of course any other libraries that these libraries need. :-)

Cheers
  Nick


___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils


[Bug ld/4988] [2.18/HEAD regression] Assertion failures in ld

2007-10-04 Thread nickc at redhat dot com

--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com  2007-10-04 14:27 
---
Subject: Re:  [2.18/HEAD regression] Assertion failures in ld

Hi Julien,

   Thanks for the extra libraries.  My attempt to build the simph323 binary 
gets further now, but it still fails with some missing libaries (and a missing 
loader).  Note - I do not have a mips-linux system available to me so I am 
building the binary using a cross-hosted mipsel-linux-gnu toolchain on an 
x86_64 host.

   The missing files are:

  libcrypt.so.1
  libgnutls.so.13
  ld.so.1
  libz.so.1
  libasound.so.2
  libdirectfb-0.9.so.25
  libfusion-0.9.so.25
  libdirect-0.9.so.25

   Plus of course any other libraries that these libraries need. :-)

Cheers
   Nick


-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4988

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils


[Bug ld/5105] x86_64-pc-mingw32 native ld.exe randomly failed to read the archive file

2007-10-04 Thread drangon dot mail at gmail dot com

--- Additional Comments From drangon dot mail at gmail dot com  2007-10-04 
15:49 ---
Created an attachment (id=2034)
 --> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=2034&action=view)
log output info when running the modified code


-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5105

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils


[Bug ld/5105] New: x86_64-pc-mingw32 native ld.exe randomly failed to read the archive file

2007-10-04 Thread drangon dot mail at gmail dot com
under x86_64 linux, I built the cross x86_64-pc-mingw32 compiler using the
latest CVS/SVN head of binutils gcc mingw-w64,
and the use the cross compiler to build the native x86_64-pc-mingw32
compiler toolchain.

Then I ran the compiler in native WinXP x64, the compiler toolchain
failed to compile.
And I think this is mostly a bug of ld.exe when reading the archive file.

A very simple "hello world" program t3.c, use gcc.exe and as.exe to
create obj file :
..\target\bin\gcc -S t3.c
..\target\bin\as t3.s -o t3.o

then the following command can generate t3.exe successfully under command line

..\target\bin\ld.exe -static -o t3.exe
..\target\x86_64-pc-mingw32\lib\crt2.o
..\target\x86_64-pc-mingw32\lib\crtbegin.o   -L
..\target\x86_64-pc-mingw32\lib  t3.o t3_pp.o -lmingw32 -lmoldname
-lmingwex -lmsvcrt -luser32 -lkernel32 -ladvapi32 -lshell32 -lmingw32
-lmoldname -lmingwex -lmsvcrt
..\target\x86_64-pc-mingw32\lib\crtend.o

but if I double the "-lmingw32", it failed to generate exe file

..\target\bin\ld.exe -static -o t3.exe
..\target\x86_64-pc-mingw32\lib\crt2.o
..\target\x86_64-pc-mingw32\lib\crtbegin.o   -L
..\target\x86_64-pc-mingw32\lib  t3.o t3_pp.o -lmingw32 -lmingw32
-lmoldname -lmingwex -lmsvcrt
-luser32 -lkernel32 -ladvapi32 -lshell32 -lmingw32 -lmoldname -lmingwex -lmsvcrt
 ..\target\x86_64-pc-mingw32\lib\crtend.o
..\target\x86_64-pc-mingw32\lib\libmingw32.a: file not recognized: File format n
ot recognized

If I run the command similar with the first successful example ( mainly change
the "\" to "/" ) in MSYS, run the same command several times,
all the odd times run successfule and all the even times run failed.
the same command!

[EMAIL PROTECTED] /c/tools/test2
$ /c/tools/target/bin/ld.exe -static -o t3.exe  /c/tools/target/x86_64-pc-mingw
32/lib/crt2.o   /c/tools/target/x86_64-pc-mingw32/lib/crtbegin.o   -L /c/tools/
target/lib.old/gcc/x86_64-pc-mingw32/4.3.0  t3.o t3_pp.o -lmingw32 -lmoldname -
lmingwex -lmsvcrt -luser32 -lkernel32 -ladvapi32 -lshell32 -lmingw32 -lmoldname
 -lmingwex -lmsvcrt  /c/tools/target/x86_64-pc-mingw32/lib/crtend.o 

[EMAIL PROTECTED] /c/tools/test2
$ /c/tools/target/bin/ld.exe -static -o t3.exe  /c/tools/target/x86_64-pc-mingw
32/lib/crt2.o   /c/tools/target/x86_64-pc-mingw32/lib/crtbegin.o   -L /c/tools/
target/lib.old/gcc/x86_64-pc-mingw32/4.3.0  t3.o t3_pp.o -lmingw32 -lmoldname -
lmingwex -lmsvcrt -luser32 -lkernel32 -ladvapi32 -lshell32 -lmingw32 -lmoldname
 -lmingwex -lmsvcrt  /c/tools/target/x86_64-pc-mingw32/lib/crtend.o 
c:\tools\target\bin\../x86_64-pc-mingw32/lib\libmsvcrt.a: file not recognized:
File format not recognized

-- 
   Summary: x86_64-pc-mingw32 native ld.exe randomly failed to read
the archive file
   Product: binutils
   Version: 2.19 (HEAD)
Status: NEW
  Severity: normal
  Priority: P2
 Component: ld
AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com
ReportedBy: drangon dot mail at gmail dot com
CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org
 GCC build triplet: x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu
  GCC host triplet: x86_64-pc-mingw32
GCC target triplet: x86_64-pc-mingw32


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5105

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils


[Bug ld/5105] x86_64-pc-mingw32 native ld.exe randomly failed to read the archive file

2007-10-04 Thread drangon dot mail at gmail dot com

--- Additional Comments From drangon dot mail at gmail dot com  2007-10-04 
15:48 ---
Created an attachment (id=2033)
 --> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=2033&action=view)
modified bfd/archive.c, add some log print


-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5105

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils


[Bug ld/5105] x86_64-pc-mingw32 native ld.exe randomly failed to read the archive file

2007-10-04 Thread drangon dot mail at gmail dot com

--- Additional Comments From drangon dot mail at gmail dot com  2007-10-04 
15:50 ---
I add some printf in binutils/bfd/archive.c to print out some value.

--
380   if (bfd_bread (hdrp, sizeof (struct ar_hdr), abfd) != sizeof
(struct ar_hdr))
 381 {
 382   if (bfd_get_error () != bfd_error_system_call)
 383 bfd_set_error (bfd_error_no_more_archived_files);
 384   return NULL;
 385 }
 386   printf( "-4- hdr.ar_mag [%s], ARFMAG [%s], mag [%s]\n",
hdr.ar_fmag, ARFMAG, mag == NULL ? "(null)" : mag );
 387   if (strncmp (hdr.ar_fmag, ARFMAG, 2) != 0
 388   && (mag == NULL
 389   || strncmp (hdr.ar_fmag, mag, 2) != 0))
 390 {
 391   bfd_set_error (bfd_error_malformed_archive);
 392   return NULL;
 393 }
 394
 395   errno = 0;
 396   parsed_size = strtol (hdr.ar_size, NULL, 10);
 397   printf( "-4- hdr.ar_size [%s], parsed_size %d, ar_name [%s]\n",
hdr.ar_size, (int)parsed_size, hdr.ar_name );
 398   if (errno != 0)
 399 {
 400   bfd_set_error (bfd_error_malformed_archive);
 401   return NULL;
 402 }
---

and from the log, the first some times, it reads the archive successfully :

--
*** [bfd_generic_archive_p:644] begin read file
[..\target\x86_64-pc-mingw32\lib\libmingw32.a]
-4- hdr.ar_mag [`
], ARFMAG [`
], mag [(null)]
-4- hdr.ar_size [1758  `
], parsed_size 1758, ar_name [/   1191037575  0 0
0   1758  `
]
-4- hdr.ar_mag [`
], ARFMAG [`
], mag [(null)]
-4- hdr.ar_size [22`
], parsed_size 22, ar_name [//
22`
]
-2- slurp ok
-4- hdr.ar_mag [`
], ARFMAG [`
], mag [(null)]
-4- hdr.ar_size [22`
], parsed_size 22, ar_name [//
22`
]
-3- extended ok
-4- hdr.ar_mag [`
], ARFMAG [`
], mag [(null)]
-4- hdr.ar_size [2985  `
], parsed_size 2985, ar_name [crt0_c.o/   1191037555  500   501
100664  2985  `
]
*** has map and first object failed.
---

but the last some times, it reads failed


*** [bfd_generic_archive_p:644] begin read file
[..\target\x86_64-pc-mingw32\lib\libmingw32.a]
-4- hdr.ar_mag [`
], ARFMAG [`
], mag [(null)]
-4- hdr.ar_size [1758  `
], parsed_size 1758, ar_name [/   1191037575  0 0
0   1758  `
]
-4- hdr.ar_mag [`
], ARFMAG [`
], mag [(null)]
-4- hdr.ar_size [22`
], parsed_size 22, ar_name [//
22`
]
-2- slurp ok
-4- hdr.ar_mag [ `], ARFMAG [`
], mag [(null)]
-3- namedata is NULL
*** slurp or extend failed
--

the hdr head reads " hdr.ar_mag [ `] ", it should be "`\012",
I don't understand why this value suddenly goes wrong ...

-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5105

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils


[Bug binutils/5059] absolute objcopy not working on amd64?

2007-10-04 Thread happyarch at gmail dot com

--- Additional Comments From happyarch at gmail dot com  2007-10-04 16:23 
---
tried binutils-2.18.50, but had same error messages.
disk_io.c seems need to be fixed to works with amd64.

disk_io.c:1722: warning: cast to pointer from integer of different size
/tmp/ccykZkkM.s: Assembler messages:
/tmp/ccykZkkM.s:795: Error: Incorrect register `%rax' used with `l' suffix
/tmp/ccykZkkM.s:847: Error: Incorrect register `%rax' used with `l' suffix
make[2]: *** [pre_stage2_exec-disk_io.o] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/sources/grub-0.97/stage2'
make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/sources/grub-0.97'
make: *** [all] Error 2
root:/sources/grub-0.97# 


-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5059

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils


[Bug gas/5109] New: Extra REX byte generated in Intel mode

2007-10-04 Thread hjl at lucon dot org
[EMAIL PROTECTED] simd]$ cat x.s
.intel_syntax noprefix
 comisd xmm1,QWORD PTR [rip+0x12345678]
 cvtdq2pd xmm1,QWORD PTR [rip+0x12345678]
 cvtps2pd xmm1,QWORD PTR [rip+0x12345678]
 movhpd QWORD PTR [rip+0x12345678],xmm1
 movhpd xmm1,QWORD PTR [rip+0x12345678]
 movhps QWORD PTR [rip+0x12345678],xmm1
 movhps xmm1,QWORD PTR [rip+0x12345678]
 movlpd QWORD PTR [rip+0x12345678],xmm1
 movlpd xmm1,QWORD PTR [rip+0x12345678]
 movlps QWORD PTR [rip+0x12345678],xmm1
 movlps xmm1,QWORD PTR [rip+0x12345678]
 ucomisd xmm1,QWORD PTR [rip+0x12345678]
 cmpeqsd xmm0,QWORD PTR [rax]
 cvtpi2pd xmm0,QWORD PTR [rax]
 cvtpi2ps xmm0,QWORD PTR [rax]
 cvtps2pi mm0,QWORD PTR [rax]
 cvtsd2ss xmm0,QWORD PTR [rax]
 divsd  xmm0,QWORD PTR [rax]
 maxsd  xmm0,QWORD PTR [rax]
 movntsd QWORD PTR [rax],xmm0
 movsd  xmm0,QWORD PTR [rax]
 movsd  QWORD PTR [rax],xmm0
 mulsd  xmm0,QWORD PTR [rax]
 sqrtsd xmm0,QWORD PTR [rax]
 subsd  xmm0,QWORD PTR [rax]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] simd]$ gcc -c x.s
[EMAIL PROTECTED] simd]$ objdump -dw x.o | sed -e "s/[ \t]*#.*$//"

x.o: file format elf64-x86-64

Disassembly of section .text:

 <.text>:
   0:   66 48 0f 2f 0d 78 56 34 12  rex.W comisd 0x12345678(%rip),%xmm1
   9:   f3 48 0f e6 0d 78 56 34 12  rex.W cvtdq2pd 0x12345678(%rip),%xmm1
  12:   48 0f 5a 0d 78 56 34 12 rex.W cvtps2pd 0x12345678(%rip),%xmm1
  1a:   66 48 0f 17 0d 78 56 34 12  rex.W movhpd %xmm1,0x12345678(%rip)
  23:   66 48 0f 16 0d 78 56 34 12  rex.W movhpd 0x12345678(%rip),%xmm1
  2c:   48 0f 17 0d 78 56 34 12 rex.W movhps %xmm1,0x12345678(%rip)
  34:   48 0f 16 0d 78 56 34 12 rex.W movhps 0x12345678(%rip),%xmm1
  3c:   66 48 0f 13 0d 78 56 34 12  rex.W movlpd %xmm1,0x12345678(%rip)
  45:   66 48 0f 12 0d 78 56 34 12  rex.W movlpd 0x12345678(%rip),%xmm1
  4e:   48 0f 13 0d 78 56 34 12 rex.W movlps %xmm1,0x12345678(%rip)
  56:   48 0f 12 0d 78 56 34 12 rex.W movlps 0x12345678(%rip),%xmm1
  5e:   66 48 0f 2e 0d 78 56 34 12  rex.W ucomisd 0x12345678(%rip),%xmm1
  67:   f2 48 0f c2 00 00   rex.W cmpeqsd (%rax),%xmm0
  6d:   66 48 0f 2a 00  rex.W cvtpi2pd (%rax),%xmm0
  72:   48 0f 2a 00 rex.W cvtpi2ps (%rax),%xmm0
  76:   48 0f 2d 00 rex.W cvtps2pi (%rax),%mm0
  7a:   f2 48 0f 5a 00  rex.W cvtsd2ss (%rax),%xmm0
  7f:   f2 48 0f 5e 00  rex.W divsd  (%rax),%xmm0
  84:   f2 48 0f 5f 00  rex.W maxsd  (%rax),%xmm0
  89:   f2 48 0f 2b 00  rex.W movntsd %xmm0,(%rax)
  8e:   f2 48 0f 10 00  rex.W movsd  (%rax),%xmm0
  93:   f2 48 0f 11 00  rex.W movsd  %xmm0,(%rax)
  98:   f2 48 0f 59 00  rex.W mulsd  (%rax),%xmm0
  9d:   f2 48 0f 51 00  rex.W sqrtsd (%rax),%xmm0
  a2:   f2 48 0f 5c 00  rex.W subsd  (%rax),%xmm0
[EMAIL PROTECTED] simd]$

-- 
   Summary: Extra REX byte generated in Intel mode
   Product: binutils
   Version: 2.19 (HEAD)
Status: NEW
  Severity: normal
  Priority: P2
 Component: gas
AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com
ReportedBy: hjl at lucon dot org
CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5109

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils


[Bug gas/5109] Extra REX byte generated in Intel mode

2007-10-04 Thread hjl at lucon dot org

--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org  2007-10-05 02:26 ---
Fixed by

http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2007-10/msg00079.html

-- 
   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution||FIXED


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5109

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils


[Bug ld/5105] x86_64-pc-mingw32 native ld.exe randomly failed to read the archive file

2007-10-04 Thread hjl at lucon dot org


-- 
   What|Removed |Added

 CC||hjl at lucon dot org


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5105

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils


[Bug ld/5105] x86_64-pc-mingw32 native ld.exe randomly failed to read the archive file

2007-10-04 Thread hjl at lucon dot org

--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org  2007-10-05 02:29 ---
Does

# ld.exe -r --whole-archive ..\target\x86_64-pc-mingw32\lib\libmingw32.a

work?

-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5105

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils


[Bug ld/5105] x86_64-pc-mingw32 native ld.exe randomly failed to read the archive file

2007-10-04 Thread drangon dot mail at gmail dot com

--- Additional Comments From drangon dot mail at gmail dot com  2007-10-05 
03:43 ---
Subject: Re:  x86_64-pc-mingw32 native ld.exe randomly failed to read the 
archive file

your command works.

I add some log in bfd_seek() and bfd_pread(),
it seems that the file offset suddenly minus by 1,
this is not caused by a seek(), it seem like some call return -1 and
then add to position.



5 Oct 2007 02:29:30 -, hjl at lucon dot org
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> --- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org  2007-10-05 02:29 
> ---
> Does
>
> # ld.exe -r --whole-archive ..\target\x86_64-pc-mingw32\lib\libmingw32.a
>
> work?
>
> --
>
>
> http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5105
>
> --- You are receiving this mail because: ---
> You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.
>


-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5105

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils


[Bug ld/5105] x86_64-pc-mingw32 native ld.exe randomly failed to read the archive file

2007-10-04 Thread hjl at lucon dot org

--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org  2007-10-05 04:48 ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> Subject: Re:  x86_64-pc-mingw32 native ld.exe randomly failed to read the
archive file
> 
> your command works.
> 
> I add some log in bfd_seek() and bfd_pread(),
> it seems that the file offset suddenly minus by 1,
> this is not caused by a seek(), it seem like some call return -1 and
> then add to position.
> 

It may be an interface or mingw issue. Please check if types used
in bfd_seek and bfd_bread are correct.

-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5105

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils