[Bug gas/4799] Common symbols not given type STT_COMMON
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2007-10-03 10:55 --- Created an attachment (id=2031) --> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=2031&action=view) Accept STT_COMMON as a symbol type and use it for ELF common symbols -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4799 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/4799] Common symbols not given type STT_COMMON
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2007-10-03 11:01 --- Hi Richard, I have uploaded a patch which takes a stab at implementing support for the ELF STT_COMMON type. Would you care to have a look at it ? The issues that I think need to be considered are: * What should happen if a symbol is defined by some method other than the .comm pseudo op and then its type is set to common ? eg: .data foo: .word 4 .type foo,STT_COMMON At the moment the patch just arbitrarily moves the symbol into the common section, but is this correct. Maybe an error message should be issued instead ? * The patched assembler will now emit common symbols with the STT_COMMON type rather than the STT_OBJECT type. Are there build systems out there that depend on th eold behaviour ? * It is possible to have symbols with the STT_COMMON type but which are not in the common section. How should the binutils handle them ? For now the patch just treats them like STT_OBJECT symbols, which I think is the correct thing to do. Cheers Nick -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4799 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/4303] gas 2.14 and over make a stabs symbol ABS while gas 2.13 makes it UND
--- Additional Comments From amodra at bigpond dot net dot au 2007-10-03 11:46 --- http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils-cvs/2007-10/msg00012.html Note that this patch make a symbol of type 0 for .stabs "foo", 0, 0, 0, 0 which is shown as *ABS*. 2.13 changes the symbol type to 1 to get an UND global. I think 2.13 is wrong... -- What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4303 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/5090] Spelling fix for instruction
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2007-10-03 13:48 --- Spelling fix checked in. -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5090 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/5089] Spelling fix for duplicate
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2007-10-03 13:49 --- Spelling fix checked in. -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5089 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/5087] Error message does not report, if number value is below zero
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2007-10-03 14:34 --- Hi Jorma, I have checked in a patch to change the error message to: number must be positive and less than %d Cheers Nick -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5087 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/5087] Error message does not report, if number value is below zero
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2007-10-03 14:33 --- Created an attachment (id=2032) --> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=2032&action=view) Extend error message -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5087 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/5088] An 8-bit range checking overlaps a constant range greater than 8-bit
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2007-10-03 14:27 --- Hi Jorma, The test does indeed check a 9-bit range, but this is because the pm_xx8() expressions shift their argument right by one. The avr_ldi_expression() function could be tightened up to check an 8-bit range when not checking a pm_xx8() expression, but I will leave that to the AVR maintainers to do, should they decide that it is important. Cheers Nick -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||WONTFIX http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5088 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/5097] New: Spelling fix for cannot
Here below should be "cannot", not "connot", I suppose. #: emultempl/armcoff.em:194 emultempl/pe.em:1533 msgid "%P: warning: connot find thumb start symbol %s\n" -- Summary: Spelling fix for cannot Product: binutils Version: 2.17 Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ld AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com ReportedBy: karvjorm at users dot sourceforge dot net CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5097 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/5098] New: Spelling fix for ordinals
Here below should be "ordinals", not "oridinals", I suppose #: dlltool.c:2991 #, c-format msgid "Error, duplicate EXPORT with oridinals: %s" -- Summary: Spelling fix for ordinals Product: binutils Version: 2.17 Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: binutils AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com ReportedBy: karvjorm at users dot sourceforge dot net CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5098 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/5099] New: Missing apostrophe in bfd-2.17.90.pot
Missing apostrophe before %s placeholder. #: elf64-x86-64.c:890 msgid "%B: %s' accessed both as normal and thread local symbol" PLS, add bfd to Product. -- Summary: Missing apostrophe in bfd-2.17.90.pot Product: binutils Version: 2.17 Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: binutils AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com ReportedBy: karvjorm at users dot sourceforge dot net CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5099 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/5100] New: Spelling fix for too in opcodes-2.17.90.pot
Here should be "too many shimms in load", I suppose #: arc-opc.c:668 msgid "to many shimms in load" PLS, add opcodes to Product. -- Summary: Spelling fix for too in opcodes-2.17.90.pot Product: binutils Version: 2.17 Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: binutils AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com ReportedBy: karvjorm at users dot sourceforge dot net CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5100 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
