[Bug binutils/5059] absolute objcopy not working on amd64?
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-09-25 13:52 --- (In reply to comment #9) > need to rebuild all gcc toolchain again, something is wrong.. > Your system is corrupted. Binutils 2.18 should have no problems on Linux/x86-64. -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5059 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[patch] MAINTAINERS typo
--- MAINTAINERS~ 2006-04-10 05:59:57.0 +0200 +++ MAINTAINERS 2007-09-25 13:24:02.0 +0200 @@ -209,7 +209,7 @@ binutils-tgc-fm -A data stamp is not required as part of the name field, but some +A date stamp is not required as part of the name field, but some organizations like to have one. If you do include the date, you should follow these rules: ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
Re: [patch] MAINTAINERS typo
Hi Thien-Thi, Thanks for pointing this out. I have checked in your patch along with this ChangeLog entry. Cheers Nick binutils/ChangeLog 2007-09-25 Thien-Thi Nguyen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * MAINTAINERS: Fix typo. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
Re: Gprof cycle member list sorting bug
Hi Robert, In cg_print.c:sort_members gprof loses a members of the linked list when sorting! The bug is at cg_print.c:169 (in current HEAD). The guard of the outer for loop should be just 'doing' not 'doing && doing->cg.cyc.next'. Thank you for reporting this bug. I have checked in your patch along with this changelog entry. Cheers Nick gprof/ChangeLog 2007-09-25 Robert Norton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * cg_print.c (sort_members): Include the final member on the list in the sort. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
Re: [Bug binutils/4989] New: [2.18 regression] build failure on m68k-linux-gnu
Hi Doko, 2.18 fails to build on m68k-linux-gnu: libtool: compile: gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../../bfd -I. -DTRAD_CORE -I. -I../../bfd -I../../bfd/../include -W -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Werror -g -O2 -c ../../bfd/trad-core.c -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/trad-core.o ../../bfd/trad-core.c: In function 'trad_unix_core_file_p': ../../bfd/trad-core.c:122: error: 'PAGE_SIZE' undeclared (first use in this function) This sounds like a header file problem. Presumably a system header file on the m68k-linux-gnu system is defining NBPG in terms of this "PAGE_SIZE" symbol, but it is not defining that symbol nor including a header file that provides such a definition. Can you confirm this ? If this is correct, then can we found out if this is a bug in the system header (it should be defining/including PAGE_SIZE) or a bug in the bfd configuration (an extra system header should be included). Cheers Nick ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/4989] [2.18 regression] build failure on m68k-linux-gnu
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2007-09-25 16:28 --- Subject: Re: New: [2.18 regression] build failure on m68k-linux-gnu Hi Doko, > 2.18 fails to build on m68k-linux-gnu: > libtool: compile: gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../../bfd -I. -DTRAD_CORE -I. > -I../../bfd -I../../bfd/../include -W -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes > -Wmissing-prototypes -Werror -g -O2 -c ../../bfd/trad-core.c -fPIC -DPIC -o > .libs/trad-core.o > ../../bfd/trad-core.c: In function 'trad_unix_core_file_p': > ../../bfd/trad-core.c:122: error: 'PAGE_SIZE' undeclared (first use in this > function) This sounds like a header file problem. Presumably a system header file on the m68k-linux-gnu system is defining NBPG in terms of this "PAGE_SIZE" symbol, but it is not defining that symbol nor including a header file that provides such a definition. Can you confirm this ? If this is correct, then can we found out if this is a bug in the system header (it should be defining/including PAGE_SIZE) or a bug in the bfd configuration (an extra system header should be included). Cheers Nick -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4989 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/4989] [2.18 regression] build failure on m68k-linux-gnu
--- Additional Comments From schwab at suse dot de 2007-09-25 17:21 --- linux-2.6/include/asm-m68k/user.h:#define NBPG 4096 -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4989 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/4715] gld fails to link Solaris 10/x86 libnsl.so
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-09-26 02:53 --- 2.18 should work. -- What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4715 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
