Re: binutils compile error under x86_64-pc-mingw32 platform

2007-09-13 Thread Alan Modra
On Tue, Sep 11, 2007 at 05:14:58PM +0800, zhou drangon wrote:
> binutils compile error under x86_64-pc-mingw32,
> because it defines BFD_HOST_64BIT_LONG_LONG , but not use in some env,
> the following patch may fix it

Thank you.  I have applied a completely different patch to elf.c, and
modified your readelf.c one a little.

* nm.c (value_format_64bit, set_print_radix, print_value): Handle
BFD_HOST_64BIT_LONG_LONG.
* readelf.c (print_dec_vma): Don't define if BFD_HOST_64BIT_LONG_LONG.
(print_vma): Handle BFD_HOST_64BIT_LONG_LONG.
(dump_relocations): Likewise.  Expand _bfd_int64_low in a
number of places.

Index: binutils/nm.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/binutils/nm.c,v
retrieving revision 1.54
diff -u -p -r1.54 nm.c
--- binutils/nm.c   5 Jul 2007 16:54:45 -   1.54
+++ binutils/nm.c   12 Sep 2007 14:52:31 -
@@ -160,7 +160,11 @@ static int filename_per_symbol = 0;/* O
 
 /* Print formats for printing a symbol value.  */
 static char value_format_32bit[] = "%08lx";
+#if BFD_HOST_64BIT_LONG
 static char value_format_64bit[] = "%016lx";
+#elif BFD_HOST_64BIT_LONG_LONG
+static char value_format_64bit[] = "%016llx";
+#endif
 static int print_width = 0;
 static int print_radix = 16;
 /* Print formats for printing stab info.  */
@@ -269,7 +273,11 @@ set_print_radix (char *radix)
   else
print_radix = 8;
   value_format_32bit[4] = *radix;
+#if BFD_HOST_64BIT_LONG
   value_format_64bit[5] = *radix;
+#elif BFD_HOST_64BIT_LONG_LONG
+  value_format_64bit[6] = *radix;
+#endif
   other_format[3] = desc_format[3] = *radix;
   break;
 default:
@@ -1341,7 +1349,7 @@ print_value (bfd *abfd ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED,
   break;
 
 case 64:
-#if BFD_HOST_64BIT_LONG
+#if BFD_HOST_64BIT_LONG || BFD_HOST_64BIT_LONG_LONG
   printf (value_format_64bit, val);
 #else
   /* We have a 64 bit value to print, but the host is only 32 bit.  */
Index: binutils/readelf.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/binutils/readelf.c,v
retrieving revision 1.377
diff -u -p -r1.377 readelf.c
--- binutils/readelf.c  10 Sep 2007 09:05:23 -  1.377
+++ binutils/readelf.c  12 Sep 2007 14:52:35 -
@@ -383,7 +383,7 @@ byte_put_little_endian (unsigned char *f
 }
 }
 
-#if defined BFD64 && !BFD_HOST_64BIT_LONG
+#if defined BFD64 && !BFD_HOST_64BIT_LONG && !BFD_HOST_64BIT_LONG_LONG
 static int
 print_dec_vma (bfd_vma vma, int is_signed)
 {
@@ -491,6 +491,8 @@ print_vma (bfd_vma vma, print_mode mode)
case HEX:
 #if BFD_HOST_64BIT_LONG
  return nc + printf ("%lx", vma);
+#elif BFD_HOST_64BIT_LONG_LONG
+ return nc + printf ("%llx", vma);
 #else
  return nc + print_hex_vma (vma);
 #endif
@@ -498,6 +500,8 @@ print_vma (bfd_vma vma, print_mode mode)
case DEC:
 #if BFD_HOST_64BIT_LONG
  return printf ("%ld", vma);
+#elif BFD_HOST_64BIT_LONG_LONG
+ return printf ("%lld", vma);
 #else
  return print_dec_vma (vma, 1);
 #endif
@@ -508,6 +512,11 @@ print_vma (bfd_vma vma, print_mode mode)
return printf ("%5ld", vma);
  else
return printf ("%#lx", vma);
+#elif BFD_HOST_64BIT_LONG_LONG
+ if (vma <= 9)
+   return printf ("%5lld", vma);
+ else
+   return printf ("%#llx", vma);
 #else
  if (vma <= 9)
return printf ("%5ld", _bfd_int64_low (vma));
@@ -518,6 +527,8 @@ print_vma (bfd_vma vma, print_mode mode)
case UNSIGNED:
 #if BFD_HOST_64BIT_LONG
  return printf ("%lu", vma);
+#elif BFD_HOST_64BIT_LONG_LONG
+ return printf ("%llu", vma);
 #else
  return print_dec_vma (vma, 0);
 #endif
@@ -953,15 +964,23 @@ dump_relocations (FILE *file,
 
   if (is_32bit_elf)
{
-#ifdef _bfd_int64_low
- printf ("%8.8lx  %8.8lx ", _bfd_int64_low (offset), _bfd_int64_low 
(info));
-#else
- printf ("%8.8lx  %8.8lx ", offset, info);
-#endif
+ printf ("%8.8lx  %8.8lx ",
+ (unsigned long) offset & 0x,
+ (unsigned long) info & 0x);
}
   else
{
-#ifdef _bfd_int64_low
+#if BFD_HOST_64BIT_LONG
+ printf (do_wide
+ ? "%16.16lx  %16.16lx "
+ : "%12.12lx  %12.12lx ",
+ offset, info);
+#elif BFD_HOST_64BIT_LONG_LONG
+ printf (do_wide
+ ? "%16.16llx  %16.16llx "
+ : "%12.12llx  %12.12llx ",
+ offset, info);
+#else
  printf (do_wide
  ? "%8.8lx%8.8lx  %8.8lx%8.8lx "
  : "%4.4lx%8.8lx  %4.4lx%8.8lx ",
@@ -969,11 +988,6 @@ dump_relocations (FILE *file,
  _bfd_int64_low (offset),
  _bfd_int64_high (info),
  _bfd_int64_low (info));
-#else
- printf (do_wide
- ? "%16.16

Include of in bfd/trad-core.c can set NBPG to PAGE_SIZE which causes a build failure with some configs

2007-09-13 Thread Stephen M. Kenton
Include of  in bfd/trad-core.c can set NBPG to PAGE_SIZE 
which causes a build failure with some configs. An undef statement got 
things building for me again with binutils-2.18.50.  Is there some 
reason this is not unconditional now that PAGE_SIZE has gone away in the 
kernel headers?


#include 

#include/* After a.out.h  */
#undef NBPG /* Do not let  set this to PAGE_SIZE */ <-

#ifdef TRAD_HEADER
#include TRAD_HEADER
#endif

#ifndef NBPG
# define NBPG getpagesize()
#endif

FYI - Steve Kenton



___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils


Re: Include of in bfd/trad-core.c can set NBPG to PAGE_SIZE which causes a build failure with some configs

2007-09-13 Thread Alan Modra
On Thu, Sep 13, 2007 at 02:20:28PM -0500, Stephen M. Kenton wrote:
> Include of  in bfd/trad-core.c can set NBPG to PAGE_SIZE 
> which causes a build failure with some configs. An undef statement got 
> things building for me again with binutils-2.18.50.  Is there some 
> reason this is not unconditional now that PAGE_SIZE has gone away in the 
> kernel headers?

Sounds like you need to fix your sys/user.h.

-- 
Alan Modra
Australia Development Lab, IBM


___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils