[Bug binutils/5020] New: windres does resource my STRINGTABLE
As discussed on http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2007-09/msg00116.html I'm having problems with windres and my STRINGTABLE -- Summary: windres does resource my STRINGTABLE Product: binutils Version: 2.18 Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: binutils AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com ReportedBy: colin dot harrison at virgin dot net CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5020 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/5020] windres does resource my STRINGTABLE
--- Additional Comments From colin dot harrison at virgin dot net 2007-09-11 08:27 --- Created an attachment (id=2000) --> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=2000&action=view) File containing the STRINGTABLE -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5020 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/5020] windres does resource my STRINGTABLE
--- Additional Comments From colin dot harrison at virgin dot net 2007-09-11 08:34 --- windres does resource my STRINGTABLE should read windres doesn't resource my STRINGTABLE -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5020 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug admin/5021] New: configure does not recognize makeinfo-4.11
Apologies if I'm missing something.
It seems to me that configure does not correctly recognize makeinfo version
>=4.10 (texinfo-4.11 has been just released)
The following patch fixes things for me (don't know if it's acceptable):
*** configure.ac.ORIG Tue Sep 11 11:29:01 2007
--- mom Tue Sep 11 11:29:13 2007
***
*** 2403,2409
# For an installed makeinfo, we require it to be from texinfo 4.4 or
# higher, else we use the "missing" dummy.
if ${MAKEINFO} --version \
!| egrep 'texinfo[^0-9]*([1-3][0-9]|4\.[4-9]|[5-9])' >/dev/null 2>&1;
then
:
else
MAKEINFO="$MISSING makeinfo"
--- 2403,2409
# For an installed makeinfo, we require it to be from texinfo 4.4 or
# higher, else we use the "missing" dummy.
if ${MAKEINFO} --version \
!| egrep 'texinfo[^0-9]*([1-3][0-9]|4\.[4-9]|4.[1-9][0-9])' >/dev/null
2>&1; then
:
else
MAKEINFO="$MISSING makeinfo"
ciao
gabriele
--
Summary: configure does not recognize makeinfo-4.11
Product: binutils
Version: 2.18
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P1
Component: admin
AssignedTo: drow at sources dot redhat dot com
ReportedBy: balducci at units dot it
CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org
GCC build triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu
GCC host triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu
GCC target triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5021
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug admin/5022] New: configure does not recognize makeinfo-4.11
Apologies if I'm missing something.
It seems to me that configure does not correctly recognize makeinfo version
>=4.10 (texinfo-4.11 has been just released)
The following patch fixes things for me (don't know if it's acceptable):
*** configure.ac.ORIG Tue Sep 11 11:29:01 2007
--- mom Tue Sep 11 11:29:13 2007
***
*** 2403,2409
# For an installed makeinfo, we require it to be from texinfo 4.4 or
# higher, else we use the "missing" dummy.
if ${MAKEINFO} --version \
!| egrep 'texinfo[^0-9]*([1-3][0-9]|4\.[4-9]|[5-9])' >/dev/null 2>&1;
then
:
else
MAKEINFO="$MISSING makeinfo"
--- 2403,2409
# For an installed makeinfo, we require it to be from texinfo 4.4 or
# higher, else we use the "missing" dummy.
if ${MAKEINFO} --version \
!| egrep 'texinfo[^0-9]*([1-3][0-9]|4\.[4-9]|4.[1-9][0-9])' >/dev/null
2>&1; then
:
else
MAKEINFO="$MISSING makeinfo"
ciao
gabriele
--
Summary: configure does not recognize makeinfo-4.11
Product: binutils
Version: 2.18
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P1
Component: admin
AssignedTo: drow at sources dot redhat dot com
ReportedBy: balducci at units dot it
CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org
GCC build triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu
GCC host triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu
GCC target triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5022
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/5020] windres does resource my STRINGTABLE
--- Additional Comments From ktietz at onevision dot com 2007-09-11 11:12 --- I posted a patch for this. See http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2007- 09/msg00118.html The yacc file eats wrongly in stringtables the next token after passing one element. This was old code, where the parsing of strings did not need to prefectch the next token and tried to eat the next token (for what reason how ever). -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5020 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug admin/5022] configure does not recognize makeinfo-4.11
--- Additional Comments From drow at sources dot redhat dot com 2007-09-11 12:21 --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 5021 *** -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||DUPLICATE http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5022 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug admin/5021] configure does not recognize makeinfo-4.11
--- Additional Comments From drow at sources dot redhat dot com 2007-09-11 12:21 --- *** Bug 5022 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5021 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
binutils compile error under x86_64-pc-mingw32 platform
hi,
binutils compile error under x86_64-pc-mingw32,
because it defines BFD_HOST_64BIT_LONG_LONG , but not use in some env,
the following patch may fix it
Index: bfd/elf.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/bfd/elf.c,v
retrieving revision 1.414
diff -u -r1.414 elf.c
--- bfd/elf.c 8 Sep 2007 11:03:31 - 1.414
+++ bfd/elf.c 11 Sep 2007 09:07:21 -
@@ -8430,6 +8430,9 @@
{
#if BFD_HOST_64BIT_LONG
sprintf (buf, "%016lx", value);
+
+#elif BFD_HOST_64BIT_LONG_LONG
+ sprintf (buf, "%016llx", value);
#else
sprintf (buf, "%08lx%08lx", _bfd_int64_high (value),
_bfd_int64_low (value));
@@ -8458,6 +8461,9 @@
{
#if BFD_HOST_64BIT_LONG
fprintf ((FILE *) stream, "%016lx", value);
+
+#elif BFD_HOST_64BIT_LONG_LONG
+ fprintf ((FILE *) stream, "%016llx", value);
#else
fprintf ((FILE *) stream, "%08lx%08lx",
_bfd_int64_high (value), _bfd_int64_low (value));
cvs diff: Diffing bfd/doc
cvs diff: Diffing bfd/hosts
cvs diff: Diffing bfd/po
cvs diff: Diffing binutils
Index: binutils/readelf.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/binutils/readelf.c,v
retrieving revision 1.377
diff -u -r1.377 readelf.c
--- binutils/readelf.c 10 Sep 2007 09:05:23 - 1.377
+++ binutils/readelf.c 11 Sep 2007 09:07:58 -
@@ -508,6 +508,11 @@
return printf ("%5ld", vma);
else
return printf ("%#lx", vma);
+#elif BFD_HOST_64BIT_LONG_LONG
+ if (vma <= 9)
+ return printf ("%5lld", vma);
+ else
+ return printf ("%#llx", vma);
#else
if (vma <= 9)
return printf ("%5ld", _bfd_int64_low (vma));
@@ -955,6 +960,8 @@
{
#ifdef _bfd_int64_low
printf ("%8.8lx %8.8lx ", _bfd_int64_low (offset),
_bfd_int64_low (info));
+#elif defined(BFD_HOST_64BIT_LONG_LONG)
+ printf ("%8.8llx %8.8llx ", offset, info);
#else
printf ("%8.8lx %8.8lx ", offset, info);
#endif
@@ -969,6 +976,11 @@
_bfd_int64_low (offset),
_bfd_int64_high (info),
_bfd_int64_low (info));
+#elif defined(BFD_HOST_64BIT_LONG_LONG)
+ printf (do_wide
+ ? "%16.16llx %16.16llx "
+ : "%12.12llx %12.12llx ",
+ offset, info);
#else
printf (do_wide
? "%16.16lx %16.16lx "
@@ -1205,6 +1217,8 @@
if (rtype == NULL)
#ifdef _bfd_int64_low
printf (_("unrecognized: %-7lx"), _bfd_int64_low (type));
+#elif defined(BFD_HOST_64BIT_LONG_LONG)
+ printf (_("unrecognized: %-7llx"), type);
#else
printf (_("unrecognized: %-7lx"), type);
#endif
@@ -1325,6 +1339,8 @@
if (rtype2 == NULL)
#ifdef _bfd_int64_low
printf (_("unrecognized: %-7lx"), _bfd_int64_low (type2));
+#elif defined(BFD_HOST_64BIT_LONG_LONG)
+ printf (_("unrecognized: %-7llx"), type2);
#else
printf (_("unrecognized: %-7lx"), type2);
#endif
@@ -1336,6 +1352,8 @@
if (rtype3 == NULL)
#ifdef _bfd_int64_low
printf (_("unrecognized: %-7lx"), _bfd_int64_low (type3));
+#elif defined(BFD_HOST_64BIT_LONG_LONG)
+ printf (_("unrecognized: %-7llx"), type3);
#else
printf (_("unrecognized: %-7lx"), type3);
#endif
___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/5020] windres does resource my STRINGTABLE
--- Additional Comments From ktietz at onevision dot com 2007-09-11 14:35 --- Checked in to trunk repository -- What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5020 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/4987] windres does not get stdin input file
--- Additional Comments From ktietz at onevision dot com 2007-09-11 15:11 --- This fix is obvious. A missing check for a nil filename leads in strchr to a segmentation fault. I moved the default initialization - if it is nil - to top of function. -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4987 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/4959] Multiple relocs for the same symbol are not handled correctly
--- Additional Comments From atgraham at gmail dot com 2007-09-11 17:38 --- This was confirmed by Richard Sandiford to be a bug in gcc. Closing. -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||INVALID http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4959 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
