[Bug libc/4781] binutils 2.17.50.0.7 and later eats up memory when calling gnujava wizards in OpenOffice
-- What|Removed |Added Component|binutils|libc Product|binutils|glibc Version|2.18 (HEAD) |2.4 http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4781 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/4694] ld corrupts a.out text sections
--- Additional Comments From amodra at bigpond dot net dot au 2007-08-01 11:09 --- http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils-cvs/2007-08/msg2.html -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4694 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug libc/4781] binutils 2.17.50.0.7 and later eats up memory when calling gnujava wizards in OpenOffice
-- What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2007-08-01 11:24:00 date|| http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4781 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/4030] objdump ignores .gnu_debuglink
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-08-01 14:12 --- Does this patch http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils-cvs/2007-06/msg00080.html fix this problem? -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4030 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/4791] etc/standards.texi: @strong{Note...} produces a spurious cross-reference in Info
--- Additional Comments From nightstrike at gmail dot com 2007-08-01 16:03 --- Can someone look at this patch that I supplied? -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4791 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/4791] etc/standards.texi: @strong{Note...} produces a spurious cross-reference in Info
--- Additional Comments From nightstrike at gmail dot com 2007-08-01 16:05 --- Created an attachment (id=1939) --> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=1939&action=view) Proposed patch to change two lines in standards.texi I supplied this patch in my first comment, and am now providing it as an attachment. -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4791 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/4791] etc/standards.texi: @strong{Note...} produces a spurious cross-reference in Info
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2007-08-01 16:53
---
Hi,
Your patch removes the emphasis which seems to be wrong. Why not just move
the colon characters outside of the @strong{...} directives ?
Cheers
Nick
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4791
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
Re: bug in ld
Hi Martin, Here is a bug report with gnu tool suite for arm: arm-elf-as: 2.17 arm-elf-ld: 2.17 Have you tried using the latest sources from the mainline of the binutils CVS binutils repository ? If not then I would strongly urge you to do so. I suspect that this bug has already been fixed there. D9JV3WB1[/cygdrive/p/libraries/test5d]> make arm-elf-as -ahls=ex5_start.lst -mapcs-32 -mcpu=arm7tdmi -o ex5_start.o ex5_start.s arm-elf-ld -v -Tblinky.ld --cref -Map .map -o ex5.elf \ ex5_start.o ex5_main.o bsp.o led.oram GNU ld version 2.17 ex5_start.o: In function `loop': (.text+0x114): undefined reference to `__fastcode_load' arm-elf-ld: BFD 2.17 internal error, aborting at ../../binutils-2.17/bfd/elflink.c line 6509 in elf_link_output_extsym Assuming that the mainline version of the assembler and linker do not fix this problem, then please could you put together a small test case that reproduces the problem and post it here ? Cheers Nick ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
Re: [Bug binutils/4791] etc/standards.texi: @strong{Note...} produces a spurious cross-reference in Info
On Wed, 2007-08-01 at 16:05 +, nightstrike at gmail dot com wrote: > Proposed patch to change two lines in standards.texi standards.texi is not a binutils file, it is an FSF documentation file. It is wrong to change the wording of it without approval from the FSF. A better solution is to import a new version from upstream, which hopefully already has this fixed. If not, then we should be reporting the bug upstream so they can fix it, and so we can then import a fixed version. See http://www.gnu.org/prep/standards/ It looks like this problem has already been fixed upstream, though I didn't look at this very closely. -- Jim Wilson, GNU Tools Support, http://www.specifix.com ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/4791] etc/standards.texi: @strong{Note...} produces a spurious cross-reference in Info
--- Additional Comments From wilson at specifix dot com 2007-08-01 17:57
---
Subject: Re: etc/standards.texi: @strong{Note...}
produces a spurious cross-reference in Info
On Wed, 2007-08-01 at 16:05 +, nightstrike at gmail dot com wrote:
> Proposed patch to change two lines in standards.texi
standards.texi is not a binutils file, it is an FSF documentation file.
It is wrong to change the wording of it without approval from the FSF.
A better solution is to import a new version from upstream, which
hopefully already has this fixed. If not, then we should be reporting
the bug upstream so they can fix it, and so we can then import a fixed
version.
See
http://www.gnu.org/prep/standards/
It looks like this problem has already been fixed upstream, though I
didn't look at this very closely.
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4791
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/4875] New: sha1.h:25:20: error: stdint.h: No such file or directory
gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../../src/ld -I. -D_GNU_SOURCE -I. -I../../src/ld -I.. /bfd -I../../src/ld/../bfd -I../../src/ld/../include -g -O2 -DLOCALEDIR="\"/opt /gnu64/share/locale\"" -W -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Werr or -g -O2 -c ../../src/ld/sha1.c In file included from ../../src/ld/sha1.c:27: ../../src/ld/sha1.h:25:20: error: stdint.h: No such file or directory -- Summary: sha1.h:25:20: error: stdint.h: No such file or directory Product: binutils Version: 2.18 (HEAD) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: binutils AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com ReportedBy: danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org GCC build triplet: hppa*-*-hpux* GCC host triplet: hppa*-*-hpux* GCC target triplet: hppa*-*-hpux* http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4875 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/4875] sha1.h:25:20: error: stdint.h: No such file or directory
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2007-08-01 19:11 --- Subject: Re: New: sha1.h:25:20: error: stdint.h: No such file or directory Looks like this could be fixed by including "bfd_stdint.h" and adding an appropriate dependency to Makefile.am. Dave -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4875 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/4694] ld corrupts a.out text sections
--- Additional Comments From vincent dot riviere at freesbee dot fr 2007-08-01 19:44 --- Great, it works ! Thank you, Alan. -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4694 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/4877] New: FAIL: .secrel32
This patch http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2007-07/msg00365.html causes FAIL: .secrel32 for x86_64-mingw32 hosted on Linux/x86-64. -- Summary: FAIL: .secrel32 Product: binutils Version: 2.18 (HEAD) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ld AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com ReportedBy: hjl at lucon dot org CC: Kai dot Tietz at onevision dot com,bug-binutils at gnu dot org GCC target triplet: x86_64-mingw32 http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4877 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/4791] etc/standards.texi: @strong{Note...} produces a spurious cross-reference in Info
--- Additional Comments From nightstrike at gmail dot com 2007-08-01 23:10
---
(In reply to comment #4)
> Subject: Re: etc/standards.texi: @strong{Note...}
> produces a spurious cross-reference in Info
>
> On Wed, 2007-08-01 at 16:05 +, nightstrike at gmail dot com wrote:
> > Proposed patch to change two lines in standards.texi
>
> standards.texi is not a binutils file, it is an FSF documentation file.
> It is wrong to change the wording of it without approval from the FSF.
> A better solution is to import a new version from upstream, which
> hopefully already has this fixed. If not, then we should be reporting
> the bug upstream so they can fix it, and so we can then import a fixed
> version.
I didn't realize there was the hierarchy you describe. Where is the cvs
repository for the "upstream"?
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4791
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
Re: [Bug binutils/4791] etc/standards.texi: @strong{Note...} produces a spurious cross-reference in Info
On Wed, 2007-08-01 at 23:10 +, nightstrike at gmail dot com wrote: > I didn't realize there was the hierarchy you describe. Where is the cvs > repository for the "upstream"? The project page is here http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnustandards You can get to the cvs repository for this project from there, under Development Tools. -- Jim Wilson, GNU Tools Support, http://www.specifix.com ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/4791] etc/standards.texi: @strong{Note...} produces a spurious cross-reference in Info
--- Additional Comments From wilson at specifix dot com 2007-08-02 00:00
---
Subject: Re: etc/standards.texi: @strong{Note...}
produces a spurious cross-reference in Info
On Wed, 2007-08-01 at 23:10 +, nightstrike at gmail dot com wrote:
> I didn't realize there was the hierarchy you describe. Where is the cvs
> repository for the "upstream"?
The project page is here
http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnustandards
You can get to the cvs repository for this project from there, under
Development Tools.
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4791
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
