[Bug gas/4804] New: [regression] two gas regressions (20070713 compared to 20070426)
the testsuite shows two regressions on arm-linux-gnu, seen on http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?&pkg=binutils&ver=2.17cvs20070713-1&arch=arm&stamp=1184374621&file=log sorry, no more information, and no arm platform available. Test results, compared with installed binutils: W: [gas/arm/arm.exp] REGRESSION (PASS -> FAIL): ARM Mapping Symbols for .short (ELF version) W: [gas/elf/elf.exp] REGRESSION (PASS -> FAIL): elf section2 list -- Summary: [regression] two gas regressions (20070713 compared to 20070426) Product: binutils Version: 2.18 (HEAD) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: gas AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com ReportedBy: doko at debian dot org CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org GCC target triplet: arm-linux-gnu http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4804 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/4804] [regression] two gas regressions (20070713 compared to 20070426)
-- What|Removed |Added CC||james at nocrew dot org http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4804 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/4805] New: [regression] 17 gas regressions (20070713 compared to 20070426)
the testsuite shows two regressions on mips-linux-gnu, seen on
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?&pkg=binutils&ver=2.17cvs20070713-1&arch=mips&stamp=1184379452&file=log
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?&pkg=binutils&ver=2.17cvs20070713-1&arch=mipsel&stamp=1184393627&file=log
W: [gas/mips/mips.exp] REGRESSION (PASS -> UNRESOLVED): MIPS jal-range
(mips32r2)
W: [gas/mips/mips.exp] REGRESSION (PASS -> UNRESOLVED): MIPS mips32r2-ill
(mips32r2)
W: [gas/mips/mips.exp] REGRESSION (PASS -> UNRESOLVED): MIPS jal-range (mips2)
W: [gas/mips/mips.exp] REGRESSION (PASS -> UNRESOLVED): MIPS jal-range (r4000)
W: [gas/mips/mips.exp] REGRESSION (PASS -> UNRESOLVED): MIPS jal-range (vr5400)
W: [gas/mips/mips.exp] REGRESSION (PASS -> UNRESOLVED): MIPS jal-range (mips64)
W: [gas/mips/mips.exp] REGRESSION (PASS -> UNRESOLVED): MIPS jal-range (mips1)
W: [gas/mips/mips.exp] REGRESSION (PASS -> UNRESOLVED): MIPS jal-range (mips32)
W: [gas/mips/mips.exp] REGRESSION (PASS -> UNRESOLVED): MIPS jal-range (r3900)
W: [gas/mips/mips.exp] REGRESSION (PASS -> UNRESOLVED): MIPS jal-range (mips5)
W: [gas/mips/mips.exp] REGRESSION (PASS -> UNRESOLVED): MIPS jal-range
(mips64r2)
W: [gas/mips/mips.exp] REGRESSION (PASS -> UNRESOLVED): MIPS mips64r2-ill
(mips64r2)
W: [gas/mips/mips.exp] REGRESSION (PASS -> UNRESOLVED): MIPS jal-range (sb1)
W: [gas/mips/mips.exp] REGRESSION (PASS -> UNRESOLVED): MIPS jal-range (r3000)
W: [gas/mips/mips.exp] REGRESSION (PASS -> UNRESOLVED): MIPS jal-range (mips3)
W: [gas/mips/mips.exp] REGRESSION (PASS -> UNRESOLVED): MIPS jal-range (mips4)
W: [gas/mips/mips.exp] REGRESSION (PASS -> UNRESOLVED): MIPS mips32r2-ill-fp64
(mips64r2)
--
Summary: [regression] 17 gas regressions (20070713 compared to
20070426)
Product: binutils
Version: 2.18 (HEAD)
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: gas
AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com
ReportedBy: doko at debian dot org
CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org
GCC target triplet: mips{,el}-linux-gnu
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4805
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/4805] [regression] 17 gas regressions (20070713 compared to 20070426)
-- What|Removed |Added CC||ths at networkno dot de http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4805 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/4805] [regression] 17 gas regressions (20070713 compared to 20070426)
-- What|Removed |Added CC||james at nocrew dot org http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4805 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/4649] no transition to Thumb with local labels
--- Additional Comments From rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-18 09:44 --- (In reply to comment #2) The only guaranteed way is to write ADR r0, 0f ORR r0, r0, #1 BX r0 Note, you should use ORR (not ADD) so that it is guaranteed that the bottom bit is set. -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4649 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/4781] binutils 2.17.50.0.7 and later eats up memory when calling gnujava wizards in OpenOffice
--- Additional Comments From andyradke at web dot de 2007-07-18 10:45 --- yes, the only difference in the glibc pkg is the binutils pkg it is built against. nothing else. http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/binutils/ChangeLog.diff?r1=1.&r2=1.1108&cvsroot=src&f=h is this list complete? then it should be on of the readelf.c changes. -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4781 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/4781] binutils 2.17.50.0.7 and later eats up memory when calling gnujava wizards in OpenOffice
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-07-18 13:40 --- (In reply to comment #7) > yes, the only difference in the glibc pkg is the binutils pkg it is built > against. nothing else. > > http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/binutils/ChangeLog.diff?r1=1.&r2=1.1108&cvsroot=src&f=h > > is this list complete? then it should be on of the readelf.c changes. Please use http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils-cvs/ to identify which check in causes this regression. -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4781 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
