Re: [Bug binutils/4334] MAKE FAILED: cpu-powerpc.o isn't added to libbfd.a ?
Hi Vincent,
Sorry, it doesn't work. The filesystem is always considered in binmode.
This is because you forgot the brackets in the awk regular expression !
I did ?
Here is the fixed line :
build_dir_mount_point=`df ${build_dir} | awk '/[0-9]%/{print $NF;}'`
Hmm, that looks just like the version I have here. Strange.
With this, a textmode filesystem fails as expected !
Good.
However, a textmode filesystem mounted in /mnt/cabinmodern is detected as
binmode and doesn't fail. Unfortunately, I always build my binutils in this
directory :-)
Oh come on, seriously ? OK, then we need a tighter grep. Something like:
is_binmode=`mount | grep "${build_dir_mount_point} " | grep
"\(binmode\)"`
Would you like to try this out please ?
Cheers
Nick
___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/4334] MAKE FAILED: cpu-powerpc.o isn't added to libbfd.a ?
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2007-05-24 10:14
---
Subject: Re: MAKE FAILED: cpu-powerpc.o isn't added to
libbfd.a ?
Hi Vincent,
> Sorry, it doesn't work. The filesystem is always considered in binmode.
> This is because you forgot the brackets in the awk regular expression !
I did ?
> Here is the fixed line :
> build_dir_mount_point=`df ${build_dir} | awk '/[0-9]%/{print $NF;}'`
Hmm, that looks just like the version I have here. Strange.
> With this, a textmode filesystem fails as expected !
Good.
> However, a textmode filesystem mounted in /mnt/cabinmodern is detected as
> binmode and doesn't fail. Unfortunately, I always build my binutils in this
> directory :-)
Oh come on, seriously ? OK, then we need a tighter grep. Something like:
is_binmode=`mount | grep "${build_dir_mount_point} " | grep
"\(binmode\)"`
Would you like to try this out please ?
Cheers
Nick
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4334
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
Re: [Bug binutils/4334] MAKE FAILED: cpu-powerpc.o isn't added to libbfd.a ?
Nick Clifton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi Vincent, > >> Sorry, it doesn't work. The filesystem is always considered in binmode. >> This is because you forgot the brackets in the awk regular expression ! > > I did ? autoconf uses [] for quotes. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, [EMAIL PROTECTED] SuSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany PGP key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5 "And now for something completely different." ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/4334] MAKE FAILED: cpu-powerpc.o isn't added to libbfd.a ?
--- Additional Comments From schwab at suse dot de 2007-05-24 10:23 --- Subject: Re: MAKE FAILED: cpu-powerpc.o isn't added to libbfd.a ? Nick Clifton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi Vincent, > >> Sorry, it doesn't work. The filesystem is always considered in binmode. >> This is because you forgot the brackets in the awk regular expression ! > > I did ? autoconf uses [] for quotes. Andreas. -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4334 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/4515] bad definition of start address in ldscripts for OMAGIC
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2007-05-24 11:50
---
Hi Quentin,
> When making OMAGIC executables with ld with the swich -N, the ld script begins
> with :
>
>> SECTIONS
>> {
>> . = 0x1020;
It does ? The version I have locally starts with ". = 0".
> It seems that giving to ld a script with . = 0x0 corrects the problem.
> However,
> I'm unable to find out where to change in the sources.
The linker scripts are built by the genscripts.sh script in the linker source
directory. They are constructed into the ldscripts/ directory in the build tree
and the script for the -N switch will have the extension .xbn.
The scripts are build from a template in the ld/scripttempl/ source directory,
together with information from a parameters file in ld/emulparam/ source
directory. For the i486-aout target these should be the ld/scripttempl/aout.sc
file and the ld/emulparams/i386aout.sh. The start address should then be
controlled by the value given to the TEXT_START_ADDR shell variable.
Cheers
Nick
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4515
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/4334] MAKE FAILED: cpu-powerpc.o isn't added to libbfd.a ?
--- Additional Comments From dj at redhat dot com 2007-05-24 16:49 --- IMHO the bug is that cygwin's bash isn't correctly stripping line endings while doing command substitution; it should always allow CR/LF at the end of `` substitutions, regardless of the mount mode. Also, it should allow CR/LF as word delimiters. I don't think sticking our head in the sand is the right way to address this problem. Perhaps we should *test* for bogus CR/LF handling, and issue a more appropriate error message? -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4334 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/4284] Linker "relax" option results in bad subroutine calls
--- Additional Comments From bjoern dot m dot haase at web dot de 2007-05-24 20:05 --- Maybe you could try to use the avr-ld option --no-call-ret-replacement The relaxation machine normally will substitute two immediately following call/ret instructions by a single jump instruction. This option disables this optimization. There might be some assembler files in your operating system code that might break with this optimization. -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4284 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
