[Bug binutils/4361] New: vv
vv -- Summary: vv Product: binutils Version: unspecified Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: binutils AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com ReportedBy: rotvrot at land dot ru CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4361 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/4361] vv
--- Additional Comments From rotvrot at land dot ru 2007-04-14 10:29 --- Created an attachment (id=1684) --> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=1684&action=view) qq -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4361 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/4361] vv
--- Additional Comments From rotvrot at land dot ru 2007-04-14 10:29 --- Created an attachment (id=1685) --> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=1685&action=view) rr -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4361 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/4361] vv
--- Additional Comments From amodra at bigpond dot net dot au 2007-04-14 13:27 --- Spam -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||INVALID http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4361 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/4365] New: COFF relocation record bug
I'm fairly certain there is a bug in the COFF code. My particular problem is with coff-x86-64 in the development version of binutils, but I've had similar troubles with 32-bit coff in the past. I have rather large COFF object files built by MASM that I translate to ELF using objcopy. The instruction that isn't converting properly is: "movrax, OFFSET some_variable" Dumpbin and objdump seem to indicate the relocation record for "some_variable" is not being converted properly. I'd be happy to provide you with source code, object files, or even work to get the smallest possible reproducible source file. If you're not interested in the problem, I'll find some way to work around the trouble. The similar 32-bit object file problem I had forced me to replace "CALL some_routine" with: push OFFSET xxx push OFFSET somer_routine ret xxx: This may have been fixed. I don't know as I've used macros to work around the problem for several years. -- Summary: COFF relocation record bug Product: binutils Version: 2.18 (HEAD) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: binutils AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com ReportedBy: gwoltman at earthlink dot net CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4365 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
