[Bug ld/4304] ld --fatal-warnings doesn't work
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-04-05 14:41 --- A patch is posted at http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2007-04/msg00057.html -- What|Removed |Added CC||hjl at lucon dot org http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4304 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/4302] [regression] ld fails to link gcc-4.1's libstdc++ debug build
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-04-05 15:04 --- What is the last working version in CVS for PPC and Sparc? I don't have PPC nor Sparc. If you can provide me testcacases for PPC and Sparc I can use with a cross linker, I will try to take a look. -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4302 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/4304] ld --fatal-warnings doesn't work
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-04-05 16:58 --- A simple patch is at http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2007-04/msg00059.html -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4304 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/4304] ld --fatal-warnings doesn't work
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-04-05 17:17 --- Fixed by http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2007-04/msg00061.html -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4304 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/4302] [regression] ld fails to link gcc-4.1's libstdc++ debug build
--- Additional Comments From doko at debian dot org 2007-04-05 18:15 --- I added http://people.ubuntu.com/~doko/tmp/libstd++-v3-gcc-4.1-powerpc-host=i386.tar.bz2 this is a ld configured with --enable-targets=powerpc-linux-gnu,powerpc64-linux-gnu the last binutils I sucessfully checked was 20070210. -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4302 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/4302] [regression] ld fails to link gcc-4.1's libstdc++ debug build
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-04-05 19:19 --- (In reply to comment #4) > I added > http://people.ubuntu.com/~doko/tmp/libstd++-v3-gcc-4.1-powerpc-host=i386.tar.bz2 > this is a ld configured with --enable-targets=powerpc-linux-gnu,powerpc64-linux-gnu > > the last binutils I sucessfully checked was 20070210. > 20070210 linker doesn't work for me either: GNU ld version 2.17.50 20070210 ./ld-last: .libs/libstdc++.so.6.0.8: undefined versioned symbol name [EMAIL PROTECTED] ./ld-last: failed to set dynamic section sizes: Bad value make: *** [foo] Error 1 The problem may be in gcc or assembler. -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4302 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/4302] [regression] ld fails to link gcc-4.1's libstdc++ debug build
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-04-05 19:55 --- src/debug/.libs/compatibility.o is wrong: [EMAIL PROTECTED] .libs]$ readelf -s compatibility.o | grep GLIBC 159: 88 FUNCGLOBAL DEFAULT 73 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 160: 88 FUNCGLOBAL DEFAULT 71 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 161: 96 FUNCGLOBAL DEFAULT 69 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 162: 88 FUNCGLOBAL DEFAULT 67 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 163: 88 FUNCGLOBAL DEFAULT 65 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 164: 88 FUNCGLOBAL DEFAULT 63 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 165: 88 FUNCGLOBAL DEFAULT 61 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 166: 88 FUNCGLOBAL DEFAULT 59 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 167: 88 FUNCGLOBAL DEFAULT 57 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 168: 96 FUNCGLOBAL DEFAULT 55 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 169: 96 FUNCGLOBAL DEFAULT 53 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 170: 96 FUNCGLOBAL DEFAULT 51 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 171: 96 FUNCGLOBAL DEFAULT 49 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 172: 88 FUNCGLOBAL DEFAULT 47 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 173: 88 FUNCGLOBAL DEFAULT 45 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 174: 96 FUNCGLOBAL DEFAULT 43 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 175: 96 FUNCGLOBAL DEFAULT 41 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 176: 88 FUNCGLOBAL DEFAULT 39 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 177: 88 FUNCGLOBAL DEFAULT 37 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 178: 88 FUNCGLOBAL DEFAULT 35 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 179: 88 FUNCGLOBAL DEFAULT 33 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 180: 88 FUNCGLOBAL DEFAULT 31 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Where are they coming from? I don't see them on Linux/x86-64. -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4302 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/4302] [regression] ld fails to link gcc-4.1's libstdc++ debug build
--- Additional Comments From doko at debian dot org 2007-04-05 21:38 --- for both targets GCC is configured --with-long-double-128, after applying http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25864#c14 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25864#c13 -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4302 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/4302] [regression] ld fails to link gcc-4.1's libstdc++ debug build
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-04-05 21:42 --- (In reply to comment #7) > for both targets GCC is configured --with-long-double-128, after applying > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25864#c14 > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25864#c13 > Those symbols are for glibc. Why do they have libstdc++ version names? I think it is a gcc bug. Please open a gcc bug instead. -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||INVALID http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4302 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
