[Bug ld/3843] Extra libpath (32-bit) on GNU/kFreeBSD
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2007-01-08 15:39 --- Hi Aurelien, Sure. I have applied your patch together with this ChangeLog entry. Cheers Nick ld/ChangeLog 2007-01-08 Aurelien Jarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PR ld/3843 * configure.tgt (x86_64_[k]freebsd*): Add targ_extra_libpath and tdir_elf_i386_fbsd. -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3843 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/3831] Support for automatically including symbols in the list of dynamic symbols that are referenced as global data
--- Additional Comments From shausman at trolltech dot com 2007-01-08 16:06 --- Excellent, the patch works for us! We've tried it on our example apps as well as the entire Qt library and the Qtopia stack on top (running on arm) and it works now. Thanks a lot! -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3831 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/3831] Support for automatically including symbols in the list of dynamic symbols that are referenced as global data
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-01-08 17:21 --- (In reply to comment #9) > Excellent, the patch works for us! > > We've tried it on our example apps as well as the entire Qt library and the > Qtopia stack on top (running on arm) and it works now. > > Thanks a lot! How does it impact performance? Do you have any data? -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3831 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/3831] Support for automatically including symbols in the list of dynamic symbols that are referenced as global data
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-01-09 01:50 --- Created an attachment (id=1481) --> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=1481&action=view) An updated patch Please try this updated patch. It fixed a serious bug. -- What|Removed |Added Attachment #1475 is|0 |1 obsolete|| http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3831 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
gcc or binutils bug?
I'm experiencing some problem try to build binutils-2.17 using GCC 4.1.1 on an AMD Athon. By default, binutils-2.17 is configured and compiled with -Werror. When using -O2, binutils-2.17 compiles cleanly. However, with -O3, I get some warnings which get elevated to fatal errors. I tried looking in the binutils bug report archives and couldn't find anything (but I may just now know how to search appropriately). I'm not sure how to determine if this is a problem with gcc or with binutils (or both).I don't want to submit a bogus bug report to the wrong people. Could someone please let me know if I should report this problem at all, and if yes to whom? Thank you. Paul Novak [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
Re: gcc or binutils bug?
Hi Paul, I'm experiencing some problem try to build binutils-2.17 using GCC 4.1.1 on an AMD Athon. By default, binutils-2.17 is configured and compiled with -Werror. When using -O2, binutils-2.17 compiles cleanly. However, with -O3, I get some warnings which get elevated to fatal errors. We enabled -Werror in order to help uncover any lurking bugs which do not normally trigger compiler error messages. (And in the process also to help tidy up the sources). Hence we are very much interested in warnings/errors produced when compiling at -O3, even though we do not normally do that ourselves. So, please feel free to report these warnings/errors on this list. Even better, please feel free to submit patches to fix them as well. In some cases however it is necessary to be a little bit cautious, as not all warnings reported at -O3 are actual problems with the code. Sometimes the compiler itself can be a little bit too over-enthusiastic. In such cases we will consider altering the code to avoid the warning as long as it does not introduce any performance penalties or unnecessary complexities into the code. Otherwise we would probably just ignore the warning and instead put a comment into the code explaining why we are not taking any other action. Cheers Nick ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
