Re: [Bug gas/3607] GAS errors on valid code complaining missing .cfi_endproc
Hi Khem, Jakub has just checked in a patch that should fix this: 2006-12-02 Jakub Jelinek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PR gas/3607 * subsegs.c (subseg_set_rest): Clear frch_cfi_data field. Please could you update your sources, reapply your local patch (if necessary) and verify whether or not the problem is fixed ? Cheers Nick ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/3607] GAS errors on valid code complaining missing .cfi_endproc
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2006-12-04 10:36 --- Subject: Re: GAS errors on valid code complaining missing .cfi_endproc Hi Khem, Jakub has just checked in a patch that should fix this: 2006-12-02 Jakub Jelinek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PR gas/3607 * subsegs.c (subseg_set_rest): Clear frch_cfi_data field. Please could you update your sources, reapply your local patch (if necessary) and verify whether or not the problem is fixed ? Cheers Nick -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3607 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/3607] GAS errors on valid code complaining missing .cfi_endproc
--- Additional Comments From raj dot khem at gmail dot com 2006-12-04 19:46 --- (In reply to comment #4) > Subject: Re: GAS errors on valid code complaining missing.cfi_endproc > > Hi Khem, > > Jakub has just checked in a patch that should fix this: > >2006-12-02 Jakub Jelinek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > PR gas/3607 > * subsegs.c (subseg_set_rest): Clear frch_cfi_data field. > > Please could you update your sources, reapply your local patch (if > necessary) and verify whether or not the problem is fixed ? > > Cheers >Nick > > yes. That fixes it many thanks. -- What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3607 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/3607] GAS errors on valid code complaining missing .cfi_endproc
--- Additional Comments From raj dot khem at gmail dot com 2006-12-04 19:47 --- verified by doing local glibc-cvs build -- What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|VERIFIED http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3607 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
objdump -i ordering?
We received this question on webmasters (thanks, Tiron), so forwarding ... Subject:Question about the binutils package Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2006 01:48:08 -0800 (PST) To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Tiron Adrian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Hello Sirs, I was looking through the sources of objdump and i think it is possible that i've found a bug...i'm not sure. So here it is: When you run objdump -i in function display_info_table() you say in a comment at the beggining at the function /*Print a table showing which architectures are supported for entries FIRST through LAST-1 of bfd_target_vector (targets across, architectures down). */ So target across and architectures down. However you print the targets across and again the targets down. Shouldn't you print instead the architectures down? Thanks. Best regards, Tiron Adrian ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
