[Bug gas/3054] unknown architecture `ep9312'
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2006-09-08 08:16 --- Hi Mark, > GCC build with "--with-cpu=ep9312" works fine with binutils. Your argument > is clear to me, but what do the gcc guys think about that? Well since Richard Earnshaw is both the gcc ARM maintainer and the binutils ARM maintainer, and since I happen to know that he does not have a split personality, I think that it is safe to say that he is aware of the situation. I think that Richard's stance is that treating the EP9312 as a cpu type not an architectyre type is the correct thing to do, and that really GCC should not be accepting it with the --arch switch. I expect that he will get around to fixing this one day. (Of cource I could be wrong about this, but this is what I currently believe to be true). Cheers Nick -- What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3054 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/3186] New: symbol `.debug_abbrev' required but not present
$ cat tmp.cpp
#include
void foo()
{
}
$ g++ -O1 -gdwarf-2 -g2 -feliminate-dwarf2-dups tmp.cpp -c --save-temps
$ strip --strip-debug tmp.o
BFD: st0P202e: symbol `.debug_abbrev' required but not present
strip: st0P202e: No symbols
--
Summary: symbol `.debug_abbrev' required but not present
Product: binutils
Version: 2.17
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: binutils
AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com
ReportedBy: pluto at agmk dot net
CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org
GCC target triplet: *-linux
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3186
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/3186] symbol `.debug_abbrev' required but not present
--- Additional Comments From pluto at agmk dot net 2006-09-08 09:36 --- Created an attachment (id=1289) --> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=1289&action=view) assembly source produced by gcc-4.1.2svn. -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3186 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/3110] unsupported relocation type {R_SPARC_H44, R_SPARC_WDISP30, R_SPARC_64}
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2006-09-08 15:07 --- Hi Pawel, The real problem here appears to be that the libraries you are stripping contain object files of different target types (elf64-big and elf64-sparc). Objcopy was assuming that you wanted to convert all of the object files in the library to one particular file format (elf64-big - the format of the first file in the library). The error messages arose because objcopy was unable to convert some of the relocs in the object files from elf64-big to elf64-sparc. The uploaded patch should fix this problem, so that by default objcopy will preserve the file formats of copied archive elements unless it has been given the -O (or --output-target) command line switch. Please could you try it out and let me know how you get on. Cheers Nick -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3110 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/3110] unsupported relocation type {R_SPARC_H44, R_SPARC_WDISP30, R_SPARC_64}
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2006-09-08 15:08 --- Created an attachment (id=1290) --> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=1290&action=view) Preserve output file formats of copied archive elements unless explicitly requiested otherwise -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3110 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/3129] Document use of \() in .macro
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2006-09-08 16:23 --- Created an attachment (id=1291) --> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=1291&action=view) Improve macro documentation -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3129 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/3129] Document use of \() in .macro
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2006-09-08 16:24 --- Hi Markus, I have applied the upload patch to improve the documenation in the way that you suggested. Cheers Nick -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3129 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/3129] Document use of \() in .macro
--- Additional Comments From markus at gyger dot org 2006-09-08 17:27
---
Subject: Re: Document use of \() in .macro
Hi Nick,
> I have applied the upload patch to improve the documenation in the way that
> you suggested.
Thanks! In case you're still in there, there are two other small doc issues:
diff -ur o/binutils-2.16.1/gas/doc/as.texinfo binutils-2.16.1/gas/doc/as.texinfo
--- o/binutils-2.16.1/gas/doc/as.texinfoTue Mar 8 13:59:23 2005
+++ binutils-2.16.1/gas/doc/as.texinfo Sat Aug 26 01:07:56 2006
@@ -103,7 +103,7 @@
This file documents the GNU Assembler "@value{AS}".
@c man begin COPYRIGHT
-Copyright (C) 1991, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 2000, 2001, 2002
Free Software Foundation, Inc.
+Copyright (C) 1991-2006 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document
under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.1
@@ -156,7 +156,7 @@
@end tex
@vskip 0pt plus 1filll
-Copyright @copyright{} 1991, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 2000,
2001, 2002 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
+Copyright @copyright{} 1991-2006 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document
under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.1
diff -ur o/binutils-2.16.1/gas/doc/c-h8300.texi
binutils-2.16.1/gas/doc/c-h8300.texi
--- o/binutils-2.16.1/gas/doc/c-h8300.texi Thu Mar 3 01:29:53 2005
+++ binutils-2.16.1/gas/doc/c-h8300.texiFri Aug 25 23:00:01 2006
@@ -4,8 +4,13 @@
@c For copying conditions, see the file as.texinfo.
@ifset GENERIC
@page
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ifset
@node H8/300-Dependent
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ifset
[EMAIL PROTECTED] GENERIC
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Renesas-all
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Machine Dependencies
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ifclear
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ifclear
@chapter H8/300 Dependent Features
@cindex H8/300 support
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3129
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/3041] Bogus jump to weak symbol on m68k-unknown-netbsd
--- Additional Comments From vincent dot riviere at freesbee dot fr 2006-09-08 20:46 --- Sorry, your fix does not work because... it is not compiled !!! It is inside a #ifdef OBJ_ELF block, but the m68k-unknown-netbsd target uses the a.out format. Furthermore, I think you forgot to remove a double ampersand in your fix : S_IS_WEAK (&& fixP->fx_addsy)) Thank you for trying to solve this bug ! -- What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3041 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
