[Bug admin/960] recent change makes bootstrap / 'make install' fail
--- Additional Comments From tschwinge at gnu dot org 2006-03-28 09:03 --- > This PR looks like it can be closed now. Correct? It's been a long time, but as I didn't see this breakage anymore: yes. -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=960 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/2494] New: Wrong opcode for SEC instruction
pdp11 assembler generate the opcode of CLC on SEC command: > cat test.asm sec clc > pdp11-aout-as -al test.asm GAS LISTING test.asmpage 1 1 A100 sec 2 0002 A100 clc -- Summary: Wrong opcode for SEC instruction Product: binutils Version: 2.16 Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: binutils AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com ReportedBy: silyevsk at gmail dot com CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org GCC build triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu GCC host triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu GCC target triplet: pdp11-unknown-aout http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2494 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
objdump
sorry My name is paz and I have a doubt, how can I convert my ".srec" file to ".od" to use it with AVRORA?? I try with that, but it dosen't work. objdump -zhD --architecture=avr blink.srec > blink.od jdump: blink.srec: no symbols Thamks. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/868] bfd leaks memory in several places
--- Additional Comments From levon at movementarian dot org 2006-03-28 13:36 --- A memory leak is not an "enhancement", it's a bug. -- What|Removed |Added Severity|enhancement |normal http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=868 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/2267] Segfault linking mips-elf binaries
--- Additional Comments From aurelbu at free dot fr 2006-03-28 19:39 --- Created an attachment (id=942) --> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=942&action=view) The first file... that make ld crash -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2267 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/2267] Segfault linking mips-elf binaries
--- Additional Comments From aurelbu at free dot fr 2006-03-28 19:40 --- Created an attachment (id=943) --> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=943&action=view) The second one -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2267 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/1259] windres does crash while converting res to coff
--- Additional Comments From bje at sources dot redhat dot com 2006-03-29 02:19 --- I don't think this patch is correct. The allocated d->data is not overrun by the code in res_to_bin_accelerator: put_16 (big_endian, a->flags | (a->next != NULL ? 0 : ACC_LAST), d->data); put_16 (big_endian, a->key, d->data + 2); put_16 (big_endian, a->id, d->data + 4); put_16 (big_endian, 0, d->data + 6); Are you sure this is where your observed crash is occuring? Can you please post a backtrace? -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1259 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/1298] m68k-dis.c:1348: warning: argument 'info' might be clobbered by 'longjmp' or 'vfork'
--- Additional Comments From bje at sources dot redhat dot com 2006-03-29 05:25 --- The warning does not indicate a bug, as the indirect return to the setjmp site leads to an early return -- the `info' parameter is never used. if (setjmp (priv.bailout) != 0) /* Error return. */ return -1; The question now is how to eliminate the warning. -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1298 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/2015] Segfault in setlocale() call makes programs unusable
--- Additional Comments From bje at sources dot redhat dot com 2006-03-29 05:27 --- There appear to be various AIX patchsets that relate to setlocale. Have you tried applying those? -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2015 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/753] ld 2.13.90 from mingw 3.3.1 cores on malformatted .def file
--- Additional Comments From bje at sources dot redhat dot com 2006-03-29 05:44 --- By modifying a simple DEF file based on the example in the ld info pages, I get: ./ld-new: foo.def:1: syntax error I think this has already been fixed. Moreover, there has been no response from the bug reporter in over a year. -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||WORKSFORME http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=753 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/945] [PATCH] dlltool import library compatibility with BCPP
-- What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement Priority|P2 |P3 http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=945 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/2015] Segfault in setlocale() call makes programs unusable
-- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2015 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/1299] itbl-lex.c, no previous prototype errors on flex-generated file
--- Additional Comments From bje at sources dot redhat dot com 2006-03-29 05:55 --- Fixed by: 2005-11-01 Thiemo Seufer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PR gas/1299 * Makefile.am: Disable -Werror for the itbl-lex.o rule. * Makefile.in: Regenerate. If there are continued problems with the code generated by flex, we should work to get those corrected in flex itself. -- What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1299 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/831] Get assert in ld
--- Additional Comments From bje at sources dot redhat dot com 2006-03-29 06:03 --- No response from the reporter after almost a year. -- What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=831 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/945] [PATCH] dlltool import library compatibility with BCPP
--- Additional Comments From bje at sources dot redhat dot com 2006-03-29 06:10 --- Thanks for your patch -- and to think of archiving your discussion in the bug tracking system! I think it is worth proposing that it be incorporated into the mainline tree, however for a patch of this size that adds a new feature, it will be necessary to complete FSF paperwork. You should send the patch to binutils@ and see where it goes from there. -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||WONTFIX http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=945 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
