[Bug ld/2300] New: ld does not report duplicate symbols defined in script file
In the following example symbol _start should have been reported as duplicate as there are two instances of it. But ld does not report this error and the _start symbol defined in duplicate.o file is overridden. example Sampel application "duplicate.c": extern int dummy(void) { volatile int i; /* create some .text data to move _start away from the beginning */ for(i = 0; i < 100; i++) ; return i; } extern void _start(void) { volatile int *p = (volatile int*)0xbf0c; *p = dummy(); } Linker script "duplicate-ld": SECTIONS { .text 0x: { _start = . ; *(.text) } } How to reproduce gcc -c -o duplicate.o duplicate.c ld -o duplicate -T duplicate-ld duplicate.o -- Summary: ld does not report duplicate symbols defined in script file Product: binutils Version: 2.17 (HEAD) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ld AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com ReportedBy: raj dot khem at gmail dot com CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org,hjl at lucon dot org GCC build triplet: i386-redhat-linux GCC host triplet: i386-redhat-linux GCC target triplet: i386-redhat-linux http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2300 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/2300] ld does not report duplicate symbols defined in script file
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2006-02-09 00:13 --- A patch is posted at http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2006-02/msg00126.html -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2300 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/2290] ld searches for implicit shared library dependencies in the wrong order (in particular, differently from linux's ld.so)
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2006-02-09 00:14 --- A patch is posted at http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2006-02/msg00127.html -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2290 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/2258] p_paddr in ELF progam header isn't handled properly
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2006-02-09 01:03 --- A patch is posted at http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2006-02/msg00117.html -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2258 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/2290] ld searches for implicit shared library dependencies in the wrong order (in particular, differently from linux's ld.so)
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2006-02-09 01:05 --- Fixed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2290 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils