[Bug ld/1882] ld 2.16.90.0.3 link failure on MIPS64: "not enough GOT space for local GOT entries"
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-12-22 17:07 --- It should be fixed in binutils 2.16.91.0.5. -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1882 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/1860] binutils.texi:3495: No such file or directory.
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-12-22 17:08 --- It works for me. -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED GCC target triplet|hppa64-linux|hppa64-linux |inux|inux Resolution||WORKSFORME http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1860 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
Re: [Bug ld/1150] undefined reference to `_mpi_sgi_init'
Hi Rainer, Did somebody else some tests using these binutils patches? Not yet, but I am back at my normal workplace now, so this is on my list. Is there a chance that these patches will be applied? Yup, in a couple of days probably. Sorry for the delay. Cheers Nick ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/1150] undefined reference to `_mpi_sgi_init'
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2005-12-22 17:46 --- Subject: Re: undefined reference to `_mpi_sgi_init' Hi Rainer, > Did somebody else some tests using these binutils patches? Not yet, but I am back at my normal workplace now, so this is on my list. > Is there a chance that these patches will be applied? Yup, in a couple of days probably. Sorry for the delay. Cheers Nick -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1150 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/1860] binutils.texi:3495: No such file or directory.
--- Additional Comments From dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2005-12-22 18:26 --- Subject: Re: binutils.texi:3495: No such file or directory. > --- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-12-22 17:08 > --- > It works for me. This was caused by using an old version of makeinfo. There needed to be an update somewhere to ensure that a sufficiently recent version was available. That's why the PR wasn't closed. Dave -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1860 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
ld 2.16.1: Ordered & unordered sections error on IA64
Using ld version 2.16.1 with gcc version 3.2.3, I get the following error linking IA64 modules: ld: .data has both ordered and unordered sections ld: find link failed: Bad value The error is coming from elf_fixup_link_order(), and as near as I can decipher from the BFD structures, the ordered sections in question are .IA_64.unwind. This failure does not occur with ld version 2.14.90.0.4 that we were using previously. Please help me understand what's going on and how to fix it. Thanks, John Worley [EMAIL PROTECTED] smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
Re: ld 2.16.1: Ordered & unordered sections error on IA64
On Thu, 2005-12-22 at 10:25, John S. Worley wrote: > ld: .data has both ordered and unordered sections > ld: find link failed: Bad value You might try using FSF binutils mainline, to see if perhaps the problem is already fixed. Current binutils mainline will emit a more helpful message, which gives section names and file names. It is possible that binutils-2.14 had a latent bug, and was silently creating bad executables. Since only the unwind info was affected, there could only be a problem if a signal or exception was thrown, and you tried to unwind to recover. This is presumably a rare case, and if it failed, you might dismiss it as a problem with error recovery code. You should check that your linker script is OK. Trying to put IA_64.unwind sections in .data sounds a bit unusual. IA_64.unwind sections contain unwind info for text sections. Because of how they work, the unwind info sections must be appended in the same order as the corresponding text sections. SHF_LINK_ORDER is used to implement this feature. All IA64.unwind sections must have SHF_LINK_ORDER set, and the sh_link/sh_info fields pointing at the corresponding text section. See the Itanium ABI and Itanium software conventions and runtime architecture guide for more info. The error you are getting implies that some IA_64.unwind sections have SHF_LINK_ORDER set, and some don't. There have been a few bugs in this area which have been fixed. These may or may not be related to the problem you are seeing. http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1321 http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1991 These are both problems with strip/objcopy not getting the SHF_LINK_ORDER right in the output. Are you trying to link something that has gone through strip and/or objcopy? This could cause the problem you are seeing, if strip/objcopy produced corrupted output. We probably can't do much more without a testcase that we can use to reproduce the problem. -- Jim Wilson, GNU Tools Support, http://www.specifix.com ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/1860] binutils.texi:3495: No such file or directory.
--- Additional Comments From hp at sourceware dot org 2005-12-23 03:30 --- Reopening; still not fixed. Needs a makeinfo >= 4.2 < 4.5 (?) to repeat the behavior. -- What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED GCC target triplet|hppa64-linux|hppa64-linuxinux |inux| Resolution|WORKSFORME | http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1860 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/2096] New: addr2line fails on linux-kernel
# gdb vmlinux (gdb) l *0xc010f512 0xc010f512 is in printk (kernel/printk.c:516). # addr2line -e vmlinux c010f512 ??:0 (all details can be found here: http://vserver.13thfloor.at/Stuff/ADDR2LINE/) -- Summary: addr2line fails on linux-kernel Product: binutils Version: 2.16 Status: NEW Severity: critical Priority: P2 Component: binutils AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com ReportedBy: herbert at 13thfloor dot at CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org GCC build triplet: *-i386-* GCC host triplet: *-i386-* GCC target triplet: *-i386-* http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2096 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
