[Bug ld/1031] linker errors on Solaris 10 (symbol versioning?)
--- Additional Comments From ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-15 10:02 --- > The following patch lets me build OpenSSL on SPARC/Solaris 10: And libjava from GCC 4.0.x, both 32-bit and 64-bit, testsuite results are OK. I'm going to submit it and try to have it installed on the 2.16 branch too. -- http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1031 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/1031] linker errors on Solaris 10 (symbol versioning?)
--- Additional Comments From niki dot waibel at newlogic dot com 2005-07-15 11:49 --- i'd like to prove that Eric Botcazou patch on binutils-2.16.91.0.1 on solaris10 (5.10 Generic_118822-02) works very well. i can compile openssl using gcc-4.0.1 and the mentioned gnu binutils!!! eric, thank you!!! -- http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1031 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
Re: ld: BFD 2.15.92.0.2 20040927 internal error, aborting at ../../bfd/elf32-i386.c line 2262 in elf_i386_relocate_section
On Fri, Jul 15, 2005 at 03:39:50PM -0400, David Lawless wrote: > Is this the correct approach? Or am I missing some important > detail, such as not making certain symbols LOCAL? Or am I > on entirely the wrong path for obtain my objective? Local symbols are not accessible from outside of the file in which they are defined, so converting all the symbols to local is definitely not what you want. Maybe converting them to hidden. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery, LLC ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
