[Bug ld/568] typeinfo for MYTYPE referenced in section FOO of myfile.o: defined in discarded section BAR of foo2.o
--- Additional Comments From amodra at bigpond dot net dot au 2005-06-03 09:59 --- http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils-cvs/2005-06/msg00016.html http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils-cvs/2005-06/msg00018.html -- What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=568 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/991] operands mismatch on correct m68040 instruction
--- Additional Comments From tom at hukatronic dot cz 2005-06-03 14:07 --- Created an attachment (id=503) --> (http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=503&action=view) source file to trigger this bug -- http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=991 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/991] New: operands mismatch on correct m68040 instruction
Cross m68k assembler on powerpc-apple-darwin is not able to assemble following instruction: fmovem.l %fpcr,%d1 Terminal output: [bobik:/tmp] thurka% uname -a Darwin bobik 7.9.0 Darwin Kernel Version 7.9.0: Wed Mar 30 20:11:17 PST 2005; root:xnu/xnu -517.12.7.obj~1/RELEASE_PPC Power Macintosh powerpc [d-eprg05-75-98:/tmp] thurka% cat bug.s fmovem.l %fpcr,%d1 [bobik:/tmp] thurka% ~/Projects/gcc_m68k/bin/m68k-bsd-elf-as -v -m68040 bug.s GNU assembler version 2.16 (m68k-bsd-elf) using BFD version 2.16 bug.s: Assembler messages: bug.s:1: Error: operands mismatch -- statement `fmovem.l %fpcr,%d1' ignored [bobik:/tmp] thurka% -- Summary: operands mismatch on correct m68040 instruction Product: binutils Version: 2.16 Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: gas AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com ReportedBy: tom at hukatronic dot cz CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org GCC build triplet: powerpc-apple-darwin7.9.0 GCC host triplet: powerpc-apple-darwin7.9.0 GCC target triplet: m68k-bsd-elf http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=991 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/991] operands mismatch on correct m68040 instruction
--- Additional Comments From tom at hukatronic dot cz 2005-06-03 15:04 --- I believe that this bug is caused by two separate problems in gas/config/tc-m68k.c file. First problem is in operands matching against opcode table (function m68k_ip, big for-loop around line 1216). Information in the_ins.operands array are in some cases modified during operands matching (case 'L' and case 'l' in big switch). Subsequently such modified operand fails to match against correct opcode operands and instruction is rejected. Second problem is that function m68k_compare_opcode does not correctly compare instructions with the same name. The intension was that this function should honor order in opcode table, but if op1 and op2 has same names and op1 < op2 than m68k_compare_opcode return 0 instead of 1. Depending on implementation of qsort this may produce different results. I believe that this is reason why I cannot reproduce this bug on i386-redhat-linux, because on i386-redhat-linux the order of fmovem.l opcodes is different from powerpc-apple-darwin and does not trigger the problem with operands matching. Order of fmovem.l on powerpc: IiL8~s Iis8%s Ii*lL8 order on i386-redhat-linux: Iis8%s IiL8~s Ii*lL8 I will attach patches to fix both problems mentioned above. -- http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=991 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/991] operands mismatch on correct m68040 instruction
--- Additional Comments From tom at hukatronic dot cz 2005-06-03 15:51 --- Created an attachment (id=505) --> (http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=505&action=view) Proposed patch to fix problem with opcode ordering -- http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=991 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/991] operands mismatch on correct m68040 instruction
--- Additional Comments From tom at hukatronic dot cz 2005-06-03 15:50 --- Created an attachment (id=504) --> (http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=504&action=view) Proposed patch to fix problem with operand matching -- http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=991 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/992] New: regression: ld selective1 and selective2 fails, cris-elf
People CC:ed have patches touching the sensitive code areas in the time-window given below. (This includes Julian Brown, julian att codesourcery dott com, who apparently has no sourceware bugzilla acount for that or guessable addresses.) With a unified tree as of LAST_UPDATED "Tue May 17 13:57:35 UTC 2005", these tests passed. Ever since "Tue May 17 19:08:13 UTC 2005", they fail: ... Running /home/hp/combined/combined/ld/testsuite/ld-selective/selective.exp ... FAIL: selective1 FAIL: selective2 ... with the log message being: ... /home/hp/combined/cris-sim/./gcc/xgcc -B/home/hp/combined/cris-sim/./gcc/ -nostdinc -B/home/hp/combined/cris-sim/cris-elf/newlib/\ -isystem /home/hp/combined/cris-sim/cris-elf/newlib/targ-include -isystem /home/hp/combined/combined/newlib/libc/include -B/usr/\ local/cris-elf/bin/ -B/usr/local/cris-elf/lib/ -isystem /usr/local/cris-elf/include -isystem /usr/local/cris-elf/sys-include -L/h\ ome/hp/combined/cris-sim/./ld -w -O -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -B/home/hp/combined/cris-sim/ld/tmpdir/gas/ -I/home/hp/co\ mbined/combined/ld/testsuite/ld-selective -g -O2 -c /home/hp/combined/combined/ld/testsuite/ld-selective/1.c -o tmpdir/1.o /home/hp/combined/cris-sim/ld/ld-new -o tmpdir/1.x --gc-sections -Bstatic tmpdir/1.o /home/hp/combined/cris-sim/ld/ld-new: BFD 2.16.91 20050603 internal error, aborting at /home/hp/combined/combined/bfd/elflink.c l\ ine 6446 in elf_link_output_extsym /home/hp/combined/cris-sim/ld/ld-new: Please report this bug. FAIL: selective1 /home/hp/combined/cris-sim/./gcc/xgcc -B/home/hp/combined/cris-sim/./gcc/ -nostdinc -B/home/hp/combined/cris-sim/cris-elf/newlib/\ -isystem /home/hp/combined/cris-sim/cris-elf/newlib/targ-include -isystem /home/hp/combined/combined/newlib/libc/include -B/usr/\ local/cris-elf/bin/ -B/usr/local/cris-elf/lib/ -isystem /usr/local/cris-elf/include -isystem /usr/local/cris-elf/sys-include -L/h\ ome/hp/combined/cris-sim/./ld -w -O -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -B/home/hp/combined/cris-sim/ld/tmpdir/gas/ -I/home/hp/co\ mbined/combined/ld/testsuite/ld-selective -g -O2 -c /home/hp/combined/combined/ld/testsuite/ld-selective/2.c -o tmpdir/2.o /home/hp/combined/cris-sim/ld/ld-new -o tmpdir/2.x --gc-sections -Bstatic tmpdir/2.o /home/hp/combined/cris-sim/ld/ld-new: BFD 2.16.91 20050603 internal error, aborting at /home/hp/combined/combined/bfd/elflink.c l\ ine 6446 in elf_link_output_extsym /home/hp/combined/cris-sim/ld/ld-new: Please report this bug. FAIL: selective2 I'll attach a fresh 1.o and 2.o. -- Summary: regression: ld selective1 and selective2 fails, cris-elf Product: binutils Version: 2.17 (HEAD) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ld AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com ReportedBy: hp at sourceware dot org CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org,hjl at lucon dot org,nickc at redhat dot com GCC target triplet: cris-elf http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=992 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/992] regression: ld selective1 and selective2 fails, cris-elf
--- Additional Comments From hp at sourceware dot org 2005-06-04 04:46 --- Created an attachment (id=506) --> (http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=506&action=view) selective1 testfile 1.o -- http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=992 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/992] regression: ld selective1 and selective2 fails, cris-elf
--- Additional Comments From hp at sourceware dot org 2005-06-04 04:47 --- Created an attachment (id=507) --> (http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=507&action=view) selective2 testfile 2.o -- http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=992 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/885] Missing adjustment to the ld-mmix testsuite
--- Additional Comments From hp at sourceware dot org 2005-06-04 06:10 --- Thanks for adjusting the testsuite (between "Wed May 25 04:52:29 UTC 2005" and "Wed May 25 12:57:20 UTC 2005". It seems you forgot to CC [EMAIL PROTECTED] and to close this PR. -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=885 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/992] regression: ld selective1 and selective2 fails, cris-elf
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-06-04 06:36 --- A patch is posted at http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2005-06/msg00030.html -- http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=992 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/992] regression: ld selective1 and selective2 fails, cris-elf
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-06-04 06:37 --- I meant this one: http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2005-06/msg00069.html -- http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=992 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
