[Bug gas/983] New: gas/ld .info doc's built in src/doc, not bld/doc directory if specifed.
If a build directory is specifed, it's likely most consistent to build .info's etc. within a coresponding build/doc/ directory; not the source code directory. -- Summary: gas/ld .info doc's built in src/doc, not bld/doc directory if specifed. Product: binutils Version: 2.17 (HEAD) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: gas AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com ReportedBy: schlie at comcast dot net CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=983 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/985] New: incorrect error message when assembling lmw opcode
The following assembly instruction causes gas to generate the error message shown. lmw %r0, 0x0(%r1) ../utility/gdb_raw_exception.S:1198: Error: index register in load range When assembled using the CodeWarrior assembler, no error message appears and the code executes correctly. I will enclose a file that contains this instruction. You can recreate the bug by typing > powerpc-unknown-eabi-as lmwtest.S -- Summary: incorrect error message when assembling lmw opcode Product: binutils Version: 2.16 Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: gas AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com ReportedBy: Daniel dot Davies at xerox dot com CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org GCC host triplet: i386-pc-solaris2.10 GCC target triplet: powerpc-unknown-eabi http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=985 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/985] incorrect error message when assembling lmw opcode
--- Additional Comments From Daniel dot Davies at xerox dot com 2005-05-31 16:10 --- I'd like to retract this bug. While the code does work correctly on a 7447A PowerPC, the Freescale PowerPC documentation says it's illegal. The error message is correct. -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||INVALID http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=985 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
