[Bug gas/886] gas/mmix/relax2 fails
--- Additional Comments From hp at sourceware dot org 2005-05-07 06:27 --- Same general reply as in PR 885, but for this one, I'm assigned to fix it. Do you see spurious passes on some host? -- http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=886 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/885] Missing adjustment to the ld-mmix testsuite
--- Additional Comments From hp at sourceware dot org 2005-05-07 06:24 --- In response to comment #1: This PR is here to track the state of the failures, so until it's RESOLVED/FIXED "it's not fixed". But that's the obvious answer. Do you see "spurious" passes for these tests? Since you're the one who introduced the failures, you're very welcome with a fix. -- What|Removed |Added CC||hjl at lucon dot org http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=885 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/932] hidden symbol `__gcov_execvp' in /usr/lib64/gcc/powerpc64-suse-linux/4.0.1/libgcov.a(_gcov_execvp.o) is referenced by DSO
--- Additional Comments From olh at suse dot de 2005-05-07 11:52 --- I see the same on i386, for openssl and tcl. They use -fprofile-arcs in CFLAGS. Last successful build was with gcc-20050424. I have no testresults between 20050424 and 20050504, yet -- http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=932 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/932] hidden symbol `__gcov_execvp' in /usr/lib64/gcc/powerpc64-suse-linux/4.0.1/libgcov.a(_gcov_execvp.o) is referenced by DSO
--- Additional Comments From olh at suse dot de 2005-05-07 12:21 --- this seems to be the cause: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19985 -- http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=932 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/932] hidden symbol `__gcov_execvp' in /usr/lib64/gcc/powerpc64-suse-linux/4.0.1/libgcov.a(_gcov_execvp.o) is referenced by DSO
--- Additional Comments From olh at suse dot de 2005-05-07 13:26 --- the reason is a missing -fprofile-arcs when linking libtcl8.4.so openssl fails because -fprofile-arcs is missing when linking libcrypto.so closing this bug as invalid. -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||INVALID http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=932 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/843] objdump prints wrong register size for "jmpq/callq *%XXX"
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-05-07 13:38 --- Fixed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=843 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/885] Missing adjustment to the ld-mmix testsuite
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-05-07 14:49 --- The testcases expect local symbols in executable's symbol table. But they aren't. I don't know much about mmix to say if it is correct or wrong. -- http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=885 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/806] Addr2line ignores the DWARF DW_AT_ranges attributes
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-05-07 18:22 --- Fixed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=806 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/936] sh64-elf is broken
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-05-07 18:25 --- Joern, does the patch work for you? -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=936 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/939] New: Assertion failed in linker
Hello, I am running binutils binutils-2.16.90.0.2-2mdk (Mandrake Cooker, i586). After upgrade from 2.15.x series which Mandrake used before, I am getting this error on linking: g++ --export-dynamic -o /home/janoc/src/VHD/VHDPP_TEST/bin/vhdMetaEngine vhdMetaEngine/vhdWinApp.o -L/home/janoc/src/VHD/VHDPP_TEST/lib -L/usr/lib/qt3/lib -L/opt/jtc2.0/lib -L/opt/xerces-1.5.2/lib -L/usr/X11R6/lib -lDynLib -lvhdMath -lvhdKernel -lvhdQManager -lDynLib -lvhdOmniORB -lxerces-c -lJTC -ldl -lomniORB4 collect2: ld terminated with signal 11 [Segmentation fault] /usr/bin/ld: BFD 2.16.90.0.2 20050429 assertion fail elflink.c:6191 /usr/bin/ld: scons: *** [/home/janoc/src/VHD/VHDPP_TEST/bin/vhdMetaEngine] Error 1 If needed, I can put the binaries online for investigation. The problem does not happen with every application, only with this particular in-house software and the Mandrake maintainer is unable to reproduce the problem. -- Summary: Assertion failed in linker Product: binutils Version: 2.16 Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ld AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com ReportedBy: jan dot ciger at epfl dot ch CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=939 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/940] New: IA64 assembler fails to put unwind section into section group
This comment: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21070#c7 shows an ia64 assembler bug: /usr/lib/gcc/ia64-suse-linux/4.0.1/../../../../ia64-suse-linux/bin/ld: `.gnu.linkonce.t._ZN12ConstantPool9CPInvalidD1Ev' referenced in section `.gnu.linkonce.ia64unw._ZN12ConstantPool9CPInvalidD1Ev' of class.o: defined in discarded section `.gnu.linkonce.t._ZN12ConstantPool9CPInvalidD1Ev[ConstantPool::CPInvalid::~CPInvalid()]' of class.o `.gnu.linkonce.t._ZN12ConstantPool9CPInvalidD1Ev' and `.gnu.linkonce.ia64unw._ZN12ConstantPool9CPInvalidD1Ev' aren't in the same section group as they should. -- Summary: IA64 assembler fails to put unwind section into section group Product: binutils Version: unspecified Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: gas AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com ReportedBy: hjl at lucon dot org CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=940 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/940] IA64 assembler fails to put unwind section into section group
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-05-07 20:23 --- A patch is posted at http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2005-05/msg00327.html -- http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=940 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/939] Assertion failed in linker
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-05-07 20:30 --- Please make the binary available to me. I will take a look. -- What|Removed |Added CC||hjl at lucon dot org http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=939 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/940] IA64 assembler fails to put unwind section into section group
-- What|Removed |Added CC||schwab at suse dot de http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=940 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/939] Assertion failed in linker
--- Additional Comments From jan dot ciger at epfl dot ch 2005-05-07 22:32 --- (In reply to comment #1) > Please make the binary available to me. I will take a look. You can find the set of binaries used in the failed command here: http://vrlab.epfl.ch/~janoc/files/binutils-bug.tar.gz There is a script inside which has the command used to reproduce the problem. The binaries were compiled with GCC 4.0 on Mandrake Cooker, gcc --version says: gcc (GCC) 4.0.0 (4.0.0-3mdk for Mandriva Linux release 2006.0) Copyright (C) 2005 Free Software Foundation, Inc. However I had the same problem with GCC 3.4.x, I do not think that GCC version makes a difference. The compilation flags for the shared libs were: -g -frtti -fexceptions -pipe -Wall -Wno-unused-parameter -Wno-unused- variable -Wno-unknown-pragmas -Wno-endif-labels -Wno-sign-compare -- http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=939 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/939] Assertion failed in linker
--- Additional Comments From jan dot ciger at epfl dot ch 2005-05-07 22:34 --- (In reply to comment #2) > The compilation flags for the shared libs were: > -g -frtti -fexceptions -pipe -Wall -Wno-unused-parameter -Wno-unused- > variable -Wno-unknown-pragmas -Wno-endif-labels -Wno-sign-compare Oops, I forgot to copy -fPIC as well. -- http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=939 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/939] Assertion failed in linker
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-05-07 23:22 --- I need your libpython2.4.so.1.0 and libomnithread.so.3. -- http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=939 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/939] Assertion failed in linker
--- Additional Comments From jan dot ciger at epfl dot ch 2005-05-07 23:44 --- Here you are: http://vrlab.epfl.ch/~janoc/files/libs.tar.gz -- http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=939 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/939] Assertion failed in linker
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-05-08 00:18 --- There is a bug in libJTC.so which references an internal symbol, __fini_array_end. When linker tried to report the user error, it crashed. This patch http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2005-05/msg00329.html should fix the linker. Now I get /usr/gcc-4.0/bin/g++ -B./ -o vhdMetaEngine vhdWinApp.o -Wl,-rpath- link,usr/lib -Llib -lDynLib -lvhdMath -lvhdKernel -lvhdQManager -lDynLib - lvhdOmniORB -lxerces-c -lJTC -ldl -lomniORB4 ./ld: BFD 2.16.90.0.3 20050507 assertion fail /net/gnu/export/linux/src/binutils/binutils/bfd/elflink.c:6301 ./ld: vhdMetaEngine: hidden symbol `__fini_array_end' in vhdMetaEngine is referenced by DSO ./ld: final link failed: Nonrepresentable section on output collect2: ld returned 1 exit status Can you tell me how and why libJTC.so uses __fini_array_end? -- http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=939 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/939] Assertion failed in linker
--- Additional Comments From jan dot ciger at epfl dot ch 2005-05-08 00:43 --- (In reply to comment #6) > There is a bug in libJTC.so which references an internal symbol, > __fini_array_end. When linker tried to report the user error, > it crashed. This patch > > http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2005-05/msg00329.html Thanks! I will forward this to the Mandrake/Mandriva maintainer. > Can you tell me how and why libJTC.so uses __fini_array_end? No idea. These symbols are not referenced by the library itself, they are added only when I link the static lib into a dynamic one using: g++ -shared -Wl,--whole-archive libJTC.a -o libJTC.so Then nm -D gives me: $ nm -D libJTC.so | grep __fini U __fini_array_end U __fini_array_start -- http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=939 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/939] Assertion failed in linker
--- Additional Comments From jan dot ciger at epfl dot ch 2005-05-08 01:17 --- (In reply to comment #8) The fixed libJTC fixed the problem, no crash anymore. I have forwarded your patch to the maintainer as well. Thanks again for help. -- http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=939 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/939] Assertion failed in linker
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-05-08 01:04 --- That is your bug. You never want to do -Wl,--whole-archive libJTC.a You should use -Wl,--whole-archive libJTC.a -Wl,--no-whole-archive -- http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=939 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/939] Assertion failed in linker
--- Additional Comments From jan dot ciger at epfl dot ch 2005-05-08 01:12 --- (In reply to comment #8) > That is your bug. You never want to do > > -Wl,--whole-archive libJTC.a > > You should use > > -Wl,--whole-archive libJTC.a -Wl,--no-whole-archive Ooops. That means that the offending symbols are appended from libstdc++ or libc or whatever lib is linked in after the JTC archive :( I am an idiot ... Thanks! -- http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=939 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
