[Bug gas/857] New: Gas doesn't warn ".set x, y" when "y' is undefined
bash-3.00$ cat y.s .set x, y bash-3.00$ as -o y.o y.s bash-3.00$ readelf -s y.o Symbol table '.symtab' contains 5 entries: Num:Value Size TypeBind Vis Ndx Name 0: 0 NOTYPE LOCAL DEFAULT UND 1: 0 SECTION LOCAL DEFAULT1 2: 0 SECTION LOCAL DEFAULT2 3: 0 SECTION LOCAL DEFAULT3 4: 0 NOTYPE GLOBAL DEFAULT UND y -- Summary: Gas doesn't warn ".set x,y" when "y' is undefined Product: binutils Version: unspecified Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: gas AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com ReportedBy: hjl at lucon dot org CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=857 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/858] New: Linker should abort when there is reference to discarded section
Gcc was broken due to a back checkin: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21070 Linker did complain, but it kept going and generated a bad output. I think linker should abort when there is reference in non-debug section to discarded section. -- Summary: Linker should abort when there is reference to discarded section Product: binutils Version: unspecified Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ld AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com ReportedBy: hjl at lucon dot org CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=858 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/857] Gas doesn't warn ".set x,y" when "y' is undefined
--- Additional Comments From amodra at bigpond dot net dot au 2005-04-18 00:53 --- I don't think gas should warn in this case. Setting a symbol to an expression involving undefined symbols is quite a reasonable thing to do, so long as the expression is resolved later to something that can be represented by the target relocations. -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||INVALID http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=857 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
