Thanks, everyone, for the responses! Very useful. I'm studying open
source licensing at the University of Victoria, BC, Canada, and these
responses were great.
yours,
Julius
On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 8:52 AM, Chet Ramey wrote:
> On 12/25/09 8:28 PM, Julius Davies wrote:
>> Configuration Information [Automatically generated, do not change]:
>> Machine: x86_64
>> OS: linux-gnu
>> Compiler: gcc
>> Compilation CFLAGS: -DPROGRAM='bash' -DCONF_HOSTTYPE='x86_64'
>> -DCONF_OSTYPE='linux-gnu' -DCONF_MACHTYPE='x86_64-pc-linux-gnu'
>> -DCONF_VENDOR='pc' -DLOCALEDI$
>> uname output: Linux flower 2.6.31-1-amd64 #1 SMP Mon Nov 16 04:44:38
>> UTC 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux
>> Machine Type: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
>>
>> Bash Version: 4.0
>> Patch Level: 33
>> Release Status: release
>>
>> Description:
>>
>> This file in the source contains a BSD license with an advertising clause:
>>
>> bash-4.0/examples/loadables/getconf.c
>>
>>
>> I'm curious if this is a problem, since Bash is mostly GPL version 3 (or
>> later).
>
> It's a loadable builtin. It has to be built separately and loaded with
> enable -f. And it's an example, for pete's sake.
>
> --
> ``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer
> ``Ars longa, vita brevis'' - Hippocrates
> Chet Ramey, ITS, CWRU c...@case.edu http://cnswww.cns.cwru.edu/~chet/
>
--
yours,
Julius Davies
250-592-2284 (Home)
250-893-4579 (Mobile)
http://juliusdavies.ca/logging.html
