On 1/9/20 6:09 AM, Mickael KENIKSSI wrote:
Thanks for your comment.
I understand this may not sound of primary importance for you since they
are canonically equivalent, but sometimes what we really all care about is
the path as a literal string (be it well- or ill-formed), and not the
filesystem object it points to.
Pathname expansion deals with that filesystem object, and those filesystem
objects have a single slash as the directory separator. That's how the
bash implementation deals with it.
I suppose it all comes down to an implementation question.
Indeed, it does.
--
``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer
``Ars longa, vita brevis'' - Hippocrates
Chet Ramey, UTech, CWRUc...@case.eduhttp://tiswww.cwru.edu/~chet/
