Bash-4.2 patches 9 and 10
Hi folks Just found Bash-4.2 patches 9 and 10, strange that they never got announced? --- Bye, Jojo
Re: Bash-4.2 patches 9 and 10
On 05/13/2011 04:54 AM, Joachim Schmitz wrote: > Hi folks > > Just found Bash-4.2 patches 9 and 10, strange that they never got > announced? Yes they did: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-bash/2011-05/msg00014.html http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-bash/2011-05/msg00015.html Along with an accidental announcement for a missing patch 11: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-bash/2011-05/msg00028.html -- Eric Blake ebl...@redhat.com+1-801-349-2682 Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
RE: Bash-4.2 patches 9 and 10
Eric Blake wrote: >On 05/13/2011 04:54 AM, Joachim Schmitz wrote: >> Hi folks >> >> Just found Bash-4.2 patches 9 and 10, strange that they never got >> announced? > >Yes they did: > >http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-bash/2011-05/msg00014.html >http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-bash/2011-05/msg00015.html > >Along with an accidental announcement for a missing patch 11: > >http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-bash/2011-05/msg00028.html Ah, I see. Seems both my newsfeeds stopped updating gnu.bug.bash in mid April (newest message is from 11Apr2011) Or did something break in forwarding mails to bug-bash to the news group?
Re: Bash-4.2 patches 9 and 10
On 13/05/11 21:44, Eric Blake wrote: On 05/13/2011 04:54 AM, Joachim Schmitz wrote: Hi folks Just found Bash-4.2 patches 9 and 10, strange that they never got announced? Yes they did: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-bash/2011-05/msg00014.html http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-bash/2011-05/msg00015.html Along with an accidental announcement for a missing patch 11: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-bash/2011-05/msg00028.html Patch 11 was for 4.1 http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/bash/bash-4.1-patches/
Re: Bash-4.2 patches 9 and 10
Eric Blake writes: > Along with an accidental announcement for a missing patch 11: > > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-bash/2011-05/msg00028.html It's not missing, that's a 4.1 patch. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.org GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5 "And now for something completely different."
Re: Bash-4.2 patches 9 and 10
"Joachim Schmitz" writes: > Or did something break in forwarding mails to bug-bash to the news group? Probably during the mail server move, gnu.emacs.help broke as well. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, sch...@linux-m68k.org GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5 "And now for something completely different."
Feature Request - Allow mapfile to handle NUL-delimited data
A -0 option, or even an option to use a different field separator, would be
an
excellent feature for mapfile. Currently, of course, you can use:
while IFS= read -rd '' file; do array+=("$file"); done
mapfile is considerably faster, however, and I think this would be quite
handy.
