Re: pipe buffering
Frank Kujawski wrote: > I upgreaded versions of Linux, and bash, and I am finding that the > pipe, |, is buffering differently. Before I could go a fe pipes before > I get a buffered output, now it seems that it buffers at a single pipe. > I have looked for settings in bash, as it apears to be bash related > and not command related. The specific command is > tail httpd-*.logs | cut -c-80 > While I presume this is an internal behavor to the CLI, I would liek > to be able to turn it off. This isn't under bash's control. -- ``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer ( ``Discere est Dolere'' -- chet ) Live Strong. Chet Ramey, ITS, CWRU[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://cnswww.cns.cwru.edu/~chet/ ___ Bug-bash mailing list Bug-bash@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-bash
Re: $LINENO can't be modified in bash 3.0, while this can be done in bash 2.05b
Ahmed Darwish wrote: > I've noticed that the $LINENO can't be modified in bash 3.0. I made a > script (bash debugger) which modify LINENO to a specific value before > using it, it worked in bash 2.05b. but in bash 3.0, even if i've > changed it's value, it counts from "one" like nothing happened Bash-3.0 is much more rigorous about $LINENO accurately reflecting the line number in the script. It's not a bug. Chet -- ``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer ( ``Discere est Dolere'' -- chet ) Live Strong. Chet Ramey, ITS, CWRU[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://cnswww.cns.cwru.edu/~chet/ ___ Bug-bash mailing list Bug-bash@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-bash
set -x makes "r=1 echo" and "r=1; echo" look the same
Hurmf, I don't like how the former looks like it was two separate commands according to set -x: $ set -x $ r=1 echo + r=1 + echo $ r=1; echo + r=1 + echo They shouldn't give exactly the same, no? ___ Bug-bash mailing list Bug-bash@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-bash
