Re: [arch-general] compiz-fusion with gnome
On Sun, 09 Mar 2008 21:21:14 +0200 Verner Jänes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Roman Kyrylych wrote: > > 2008/3/9, Roman Kyrylych <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > >> 2008/3/9, Verner Jänes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >> > >> > >>> Hi. I installed compiz-fusion to my gnome desktop and now I have > >>> two problems with it. First: no shadows around windows or panels > >>> (tweaked the window manager section under compiz control panel, but it > >>> didn't work). > >>> > >> > Secondly, the performance is very bad although games (e.g. urban > >> terror) run fairly good. Also it seems that there is no option to use > >> metacity styles (under ubuntu you can still use the same themes if I'm not > >> mistaken). > >> > > >> > Just to mention, few days ago I had problems with compositing and > >> openGL (I wrote a letter to the mailinglist), but after reinstalling and > >> using nvidia-xconfig --composite option (no --add-argb-visuals any more on > >> newer nvidia cards), the problem got fixed. > >> > > >> > So anyone having the same problem or know how to help, please let me > >> know. > >> > >> > >> Install compiz-decorator-gtk to be able to use metacity styles. > >> > >> > > > > Oh, and the easiest way to select it is to use a menu in fusion-icon ;) > > > > > Thanks. That fixed the metacity styles issue. > You can try the 0.7.2 things using my private repository. Any feedback is appreciated! http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=32107&p=5 Just for reference. -- JJDaNiMoTh - ArchLinux Trusted User pgpREVEdVCSTQ.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [arch-general] [arch-dev-public] [signoff] udev 118-4
On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 6:36 PM, Michal Soltys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Aaron Griffin wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 3:05 AM, Michal Soltys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> ENV{MODALIAS}=="modaliases #1", OPTION="ignore_device"
> >> ENV{MODALIAS}=="modaliases #2", OPTION="ignore_device"
> >
> > This is way more complex than you think it is. Let me explain. A
> > typical module exposes it's aliases WITH wildcartds included. Here's
> > an example:
> >
> > $ modinfo nvidiafb
> > alias: pci:v10DEd*sv*sd*bc03sc*i*
> >
> > If you want to write out modalias rules for this, you are welcome to.
> > I will give you a hint, though: each of those asterisks above is a 4
> > digit number. And that is just nvidia. Don't forget intel, ati,
> > unichrome, and all the other framebuffer modules out there.
>
> But you can use that alias as-is in udev rules, as wildcards are supported.
Wow, I actually didn't know that is allowed wildcard matching on the
MODALIAS rules. Woohoo!
Re: [arch-general] xf86-video-i810 obsolete?
> Marc Deop i Argemà wrote: >> Well, I don't use the xf86-video-intel because it's buggier to me than >> i810 is. Anyway, the most important reason to keep using i810 is that >> I can get my laptop to suspend to RAM which i can't with the intel >> one. >> >> Please, do not remove the package. >> >> Just my two cents > > Same thing here. Plus, the i810 driver is a lot faster in my 855GM. Yeah me too... Please leave it.
[arch-general] [signoff] tiacx tiacx-firmware
Hi new package for core repository please signoff both arches also users can signoff greetings tpowa -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org [EMAIL PROTECTED] signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
[arch-general] [signoff] madwifi/madwifi-utils 0.9.4
Hi small bump of madwifi drivers please signoff both arches also users can signoff, no respond from any dev greetings tpowa -- Tobias Powalowski Archlinux Developer & Package Maintainer (tpowa) http://www.archlinux.org [EMAIL PROTECTED] signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
