Re: Proposal: no more alphas/betas for Wayland releases

On Tue, May 20, 2025 at 08:03:02PM +, Simon Ser wrote: > Hi all, > > With years passing by, development in the main Wayland repository has > slowed down quite a bit, activity has moved over to wayland-protocols > and compositors. However, cutting a new Wayland release is still a > heavyweight

Re: Proposal: no more alphas/betas for Wayland releases

On Tue, May 20, 2025 at 4:03 PM Simon Ser wrote: > > Hi all, > > With years passing by, development in the main Wayland repository has > slowed down quite a bit, activity has moved over to wayland-protocols > and compositors. However, cutting a new Wayland release is still a > heavyweight process:

Re: Proposal: no more alphas/betas for Wayland releases

On Wednesday, May 21st, 2025 at 11:43, Neal Gompa wrote: > Funnily enough, I think wlroots should probably have them since > wlroots releases are so highly disruptive for basically every > consumer... wlroots has them since the last release. > That said, going straight to RCs for libwayland its

Re: Proposal: no more alphas/betas for Wayland releases

On Wed, May 21, 2025 at 05:43:09AM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Tue, May 20, 2025 at 4:03 PM Simon Ser wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > With years passing by, development in the main Wayland repository has > > slowed down quite a bit, activity has moved over to wayland-protocols > > and compositors

Re: [PATCH V8 40/43] drm/colorop: Add 3D LUT support to color pipeline

On 2025-05-20 16:13, Harry Wentland wrote: > > > On 2025-05-19 19:43, Simon Ser wrote: >> On Sunday, May 18th, 2025 at 00:32, Xaver Hugl wrote: >> We can always make the property mutable on drivers that support it in >>> the future, much like the zpos property. I think we should kee

Re: [PATCH V9 00/43] Color Pipeline API w/ VKMS

On 2025-05-17 07:51, Xaver Hugl wrote: > Am Do., 15. Mai 2025 um 22:00 Uhr schrieb Leandro Ribeiro > : >> >> >> >> On 5/15/25 15:39, Daniel Stone wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> On Thu, 15 May 2025 at 19:02, Harry Wentland wrote: On 2025-05-15 13:19, Daniel Stone wrote: > Yeah, the Weston patch

Re: [RFC] Wayland Security Modules

"Sloane, Brandon" writes: > I'm not sure how the pop-os/cosmic-comp PR is relevent. It seems to be about > exposing cosmic-comp as a library in general. While potentially useful, > several other compositors have been doing that for a while, and it doesn't > seem inform security decisions. Yea

Re: Proposal: no more alphas/betas for Wayland releases

Hi, Looking at the recent history, I think we could have cut a release at any point in time and there wouldn't have been any issues with the release. So yes, I do think that simplifying and shortening the release process makes a lot of sense! On Tue, May 20, 2025, at 10:03 PM, Simon Ser wrote:

Re: [RFC] Wayland Security Modules

Thanks Alyssa, I've seen the previous libwsm project before. From what I can tell, that effort was abandoned without ever leaving the early prototype state. I'm not sure how the pop-os/cosmic-comp PR is relevent. It seems to be about exposing cosmic-comp as a library in general. While potential

[ANNOUNCE] libxkbcommon 1.10.0

Dear all, I am pleased to announce the release of libxkbcommon 1.10.0: https://github.com/xkbcommon/libxkbcommon/tree/xkbcommon-1.10.0 Changelog - ## API ### Breaking changes - *Modifiers masks* handling has been refactored to properly handle virtual modifiers. Modifier masks are no

RE: [RFC] Wayland Security Modules

"Sloane, Brandon" writes: >> -Original Message- >> From: Pekka Paalanen >> Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2025 4:58 AM >> To: Sloane, Brandon >> Cc: wayland-devel@lists.freedesktop.org >> Subject: Re: [RFC] Wayland Security Modules >> >> On Mon, 19 May 2025 15:48:04 + >> "Sloane, Brandon"