On 19/07/14 22:27, LN A-go-go wrote:
AK 36
AL 39
AR 39
AZ 45
CA 61
CO 54
# and now my newbie attempt:
# I can get this far in approach #1
>>> filename = "z:/Geog482/egund919/Program1/BOJ.txt"
>>> myfile = open(filename,"r")
>>> newfile = "z:/Geog482/egund919/Program1/BOJ_B.txt"
>>> mynewfil
Dear Danny,
thank you for your detailed reply.
On 07/19/2014 03:26 AM, Danny Yoo wrote:
> This is what piqued my concerns. As you can see from the transcript,
> the search shows that there's not a single use of 'iteritems' anywhere
> in the facebook-sdk, across the entire history of that project
My apologies Python Gurus for repeating this request for read, write, split and
append from a text file in notepad. I worked on it till late last night and
will again today. I can't seem to get past trying to write the names to one
list and the numbers (converted to integers) to the other. My
-
On Sun, Jul 20, 2014 6:16 PM CEST Chris wrote:
>Dear Danny,
>
>thank you for your detailed reply.
>
>On 07/19/2014 03:26 AM, Danny Yoo wrote:
>> This is what piqued my concerns. As you can see from the transcript,
>> the search shows that there's not a single use of
> I'm not sure, what the error was. I had also installed another facebook
> package, not facebook-sdk. Maybe this was the reason.
I would upgrade that "maybe" to an "almost certainly". :P
You should have mentioned that detail of installing that second
facebook library. It's actually crucial to
On Sun, Jul 20, 2014 at 8:40 AM, LN A-go-go
wrote:
> My apologies Python Gurus for repeating this request for read, write, split
> and append from a text file in notepad. I worked on it till late last night
> and will again today. I can't seem to get past trying to write the names to
> one list
> It also appears that you are trying to write whole programs at the
> interpreter loop. This can be inconvenient for larger programs. You
> might want to use a text editor or IDE to write the program as a
> single file, and then run Python over that program file.
See:
https://hkn.eecs.berk
On Sun, Jul 20, 2014 at 8:40 AM, LN A-go-go
wrote:
>
> States OJ
> AK 36
> AL 39
> AR 39
> AZ 45
> CA 61
> CO 54
> CT 61
> DC 93
> DE 62
> FL 51
> GA 47
> HI 72
> IA 54
> ID 36
> IL 62
> IN 50
> KS 41
> KY 41
> LA 40
> MA 62
> MD 62
> ME 58
> MI 57
> MN 54
> MO 49
> MS 43
> MT 47
> NC 50
> ND 45
On 20/07/14 21:37, Marc Tompkins wrote:
Fourth (and here I differ from some of the others on this list,
notably Alan G) - I don't like the "while True: / break" paradigm.
FWIW I don't like it either, but it has become a canonical
Python idiom.
In fact in this case I suggested he use a for loo
Am a newbie to programming and I started learning python days ago. I have this
idea I want to execute, am a big sport and fantasy fan and I wanted to create
something that will make it things a little easy for me. My idea is simple I
want to create a program that I can enter name and some inform
On 20.07.2014 17:40, LN A-go-go wrote:
>>> filename = "C:/Python27/egund919/Program1/BOJ.txt"
>>> myfile = open(filename,"r")
>>> newfile = "C:/Python27/egund919/Program1/BOJ_B.txt"
>>> mynewfile = open(newfile,"w")
>>> while True:
line = myfile.readline()
print line
mynewfile.write(l
On 20.07.2014 22:37, Marc Tompkins wrote:
First of all, I would take advantage of the "with" construction, like so:
with open('C:/Python27/egund919/Program1/BOJ_B.txt','r') as infile:
#do stuff with infile
When the block of code inside of the "with" section finishes, Python
will take care
On 20/07/14 21:57, keith papa wrote:
me. My idea is simple I want to create a program that I can enter name
and some information about a player, for example:
NFL plays:
Jamaal Charles RB : ATT 259 , YDS 1,287 , AVG 5.0, TD 12, REC 70
Tony Romo QB: CMP% 63.9, YDS 3,828 , TD 31, INT 10, Rating 9
On Sun, Jul 20, 2014 at 2:37 PM, Alan Gauld wrote:
> In fact in this case I suggested he use a for loop to iterate over
> the file and use a dictionary to store the results...
Ah. I missed that, as I've only noticed this newer thread. And I
apologize for imputing motive (a liking for "while Tr
On 21/07/2014 01:34, Marc Tompkins wrote:
On Sun, Jul 20, 2014 at 2:37 PM, Alan Gauld wrote:
In fact in this case I suggested he use a for loop to iterate over
the file and use a dictionary to store the results...
Ah. I missed that, as I've only noticed this newer thread. And I
apologize f
On Sun, Jul 20, 2014 at 04:57:24PM -0400, keith papa wrote:
> Am a newbie to programming and I started learning python days ago. I
> have this idea I want to execute, am a big sport and fantasy fan and I
> wanted to create something that will make it things a little easy for
> me. My idea is si
On Sun, Jul 20, 2014 at 6:12 PM, Mark Lawrence wrote:
>> Ah. I missed that, as I've only noticed this newer thread. And I
>> apologize for imputing motive (a liking for "while True"); I'd just
>> noticed that you often advise it. I don't know who _does_ think this
>> is a desirable pattern; I'
On 21/07/2014 03:05, Marc Tompkins wrote:
On Sun, Jul 20, 2014 at 6:12 PM, Mark Lawrence wrote:
Ah. I missed that, as I've only noticed this newer thread. And I
apologize for imputing motive (a liking for "while True"); I'd just
noticed that you often advise it. I don't know who _does_ thin
>> Am a newbie to programming and I started learning python days ago. I
>> have this idea I want to execute, am a big sport and fantasy fan and I
>> wanted to create something that will make it things a little easy for
>> me. My idea is simple I want to create a program that I can enter name
>> and
Marc Tompkins writes:
> And I apologize for imputing motive (a liking for "while True"); I'd
> just noticed that you often advise it. I don't know who _does_ think
> this is a desirable pattern; I'd love to hear their argument for it -
> it must be really good.
It works better than alternatives
Marc Tompkins writes:
> Seriously, though, how is
> 1) Do {this} forever, until something happens that I'll tell you about
> later
>
> better than
> 2) Do {this} until this condition, which I'm telling you about RIGHT
> NOW, changes
> ?
Here's how:
The first of them is already implemented in P
On 2014-07-21, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 20, 2014 at 04:57:24PM -0400, keith papa wrote:
>
>> Am a newbie to programming and I started learning python days ago. I
>
> This sounds more like something for a database than for Python itself.
>
> You can write Python code to talk to the dat
On Sun, Jul 20, 2014 at 8:10 PM, Ben Finney wrote:
> Marc Tompkins writes:
>
>> Seriously, though, how is
>> 1) Do {this} forever, until something happens that I'll tell you about
>> later
>>
>> better than
>> 2) Do {this} until this condition, which I'm telling you about RIGHT
>> NOW, changes
>
23 matches
Mail list logo
