I have 2 different text files.
File1.txt contains:
file
RAMPython
parser
File2.txt contains:
file1234
program
I want to perform an union of these both files such that i get an output
file3.txt which contains:
file
RAMPython
parser1234
program
The program that i'm working on just combines t
On 17/02/2014 09:07, Aaron Misquith wrote:
I have 2 different text files.
File1.txt contains:
|file
RAM
Python
parser|
File2.txt contains:
|file
1234
program|
I want to perform an union of these both files such that i get an output
file3.txt which contains:
|file
RAM
Python
parser
1234
prog
Aaron Misquith wrote:
> I have 2 different text files.
>
> File1.txt contains:
>
> file
> RAMPython
> parser
>
> File2.txt contains:
>
> file1234
> program
>
> I want to perform an union of these both files such that i get an output
> file3.txt which contains:
>
> file
> RAMPython
> parser12
On 02/17/2014 10:07 AM, Aaron Misquith wrote:
I have 2 different text files.
File1.txt contains:
file
RAMPython
parser
File2.txt contains:
file1234
program
I want to perform an union of these both files such that i get an output
file3.txt which contains:
file
RAMPython
parser1234
program
On 17 February 2014 09:07, Aaron Misquith wrote:
>
> The program that i'm working on just combines two files. Any help on
> performing an union such that a keyword would not be repeated would be
> appreciated.
>
> Code:
> with open("C:\\File1.txt") as fin1: lines = fin1.readlines()
> with open("C:
On 17/02/14 10:29, spir wrote:
I want to perform an union of these both files such that i get an output
file3.txt which contains:
file
RAMPython
parser1234
program
I don't understand the logic of your "union" (???) at all. Is your
example correct?
It's an email formatting issue, I saw the s
On 02/17/2014 06:12 AM, Oscar Benjamin wrote:
On 17 February 2014 09:07, Aaron Misquith wrote:
The program that i'm working on just combines two files. Any help on
performing an union such that a keyword would not be repeated would be
appreciated.
Code:
with open("C:\\File1.txt") as fin1: lin
Aaron Misquith Wrote in message:
> As two others have said, a set is the simplest solution to avoid duplicates.
There are other questions to ask, however. Primary is whether
order matters.
If it does not, then observe that list(set(mylist)) will produce a
list from a list without duplicate
Hi,
in the following snippet, why is it I don't need to create an Exception
object and I can use the class directly in raise my custom exception?
http://pastebin.com/embed_iframe.php?i=7ANcvLHR";
style="border:none;width:100%">
Thanks
___
Tutor maillist
Hi,
Why is it i can use mu custom class exception without creating an exception
object first?
Thanks
1. class ShortInputException(Exception): def __init__(self, length,
atleast):
2. Exception.__init__(self)
3. self.length = length
4. self.atleast = atleas
On 02/17/2014 05:29 AM, spir wrote:
On 02/17/2014 10:07 AM, Aaron Misquith wrote:
I have 2 different text files.
File1.txt contains:
file
RAMPython
parser
File2.txt contains:
file1234
program
I want to perform an union of these both files such that i get an output
file3.txt which contains:
Hi Tutor,
The previous elements I sent to the mailing list were incomplete and needs no
answer from Tutor.
To clarify and re-phrase my script issue:
I want to code a game whereby the computer guesses either by luck or deduction
a number I pick within [0, 100].
In attached machine_guess_number
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 12:44 PM, Khalid Al-Ghamdi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Why is it i can use mu custom class exception without creating an exception
> object first?
>
> Thanks
>
> class ShortInputException(Exception): def __init__(self, length, atleast):
> Exception.__init__(self)
> sel
Greetings!!
Hi Alan,
The error code was that of success. 200.Donno if the site supports a post
method. It doesn't but is there any other way of automating the process.The
issue of chrome 32 with selenium webdriver has stalled the show for me. Hence i
had to fend for some other ways.
thanks,rakes
On 17/02/14 11:44, Khalid Al-Ghamdi wrote:
Why is it i can use mu custom class exception without creating an
exception object first?
There are formatting problems when I try to copy your code.
I've tried to fix them below, apologies if I got it wrong.
However you do create an instance when you
On 17/02/14 11:39, Marc Eymard wrote:
Hi Tutor,
The previous elements I sent to the mailing list were incomplete and
needs no answer from Tutor.
But you got several nonetheless.
Did you read them?
If so you will know that calling randint() does not change the two
xxx_range variables. It simp
On 17/02/14 14:29, rakesh sharma wrote:
Greetings!!
Hi Alan,
The error code was that of success. 200.
Donno if the site supports a post method. It doesn't but is there any
other way of automating the process.
The issue of chrome 32 with selenium webdriver has stalled the show for me.
Hence i ha
On 17/02/2014 15:38, Alan Gauld wrote:
In that case you should be able to call the Ajax API directly using
urllib or cgi possibly some higher level Ajax module - I suspect one
will exist somewhere!
First port of call for such things https://pypi.python.org/pypi
--
My fellow Pythonistas, ask
Hi,
I'm wondering how I can (if I can) make a for loop in which I don't use all
the elements.
for example
a100 = list(range(100))
for a in a100:
print(a)
it print out to me all the numbers from 0 to 99
But if I want to display only the numbers 0, 9, 19, 29, 39, ...(one every
10 el
On 17 February 2014 13:16, Dave Angel wrote:
> On 02/17/2014 06:12 AM, Oscar Benjamin wrote:
>>
>> Something like this:
>>
>> with open(r'D:\file3.txt', 'r+') as fout:
>> keywords_seen = set()
>> for filename in r'C:\File1.txt', r'C:\File2.txt':
>> with open(filename) as fin:
>>
On 17 February 2014 16:05, Gabriele Brambilla
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm wondering how I can (if I can) make a for loop in which I don't use all
> the elements.
>
> for example
>
> a100 = list(range(100))
>
> for a in a100:
> print(a)
>
> it print out to me all the numbers from 0 to 99
> Bu
On Feb 17, 2014 11:06 AM, "Gabriele Brambilla" <
gb.gabrielebrambi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm wondering how I can (if I can) make a for loop in which I don't use
all the elements.
>
> for example
>
> a100 = list(range(100))
>
> for a in a100:
> print(a)
>
> it print out to me
Excuse me for the bad english:
not "a random float numbers" but "random float numbers"
Gabriele
2014-02-17 11:13 GMT-05:00 Gabriele Brambilla <
gb.gabrielebrambi...@gmail.com>:
> No sorry,
>
> it's because my problem is not so simple:
> imagine that in a100 contains not integer sorted in a good
Hi Gabriele,
Without knowing the details of what you are trying, I guess you could
be interested in looking at how to define your own iterators.
Regards
2014-02-17 17:05 GMT+01:00 Gabriele Brambilla :
> Hi,
>
> I'm wondering how I can (if I can) make a for loop in which I don't use all
> the elem
Doesn't exist a way in Python to do like in C
for i=0, i<100, i=i+10
? without creating a list of index?
Gabriele
2014-02-17 11:15 GMT-05:00 David Palao :
> Hi Gabriele,
> Without knowing the details of what you are trying, I guess you could
> be interested in looking at how to define your ow
On 17 February 2014 16:13, Gabriele Brambilla
wrote:
> No sorry,
>
> it's because my problem is not so simple:
> imagine that in a100 contains not integer sorted in a good way but a random
> float numbers.
> How could I display only one item every 10?
for n, a in enumerate(a100):
if n % 10 ==
No sorry,
it's because my problem is not so simple:
imagine that in a100 contains not integer sorted in a good way but a random
float numbers.
How could I display only one item every 10?
thanks
Gabriele
2014-02-17 11:08 GMT-05:00 Oscar Benjamin :
> On 17 February 2014 16:05, Gabriele Brambill
On 17 February 2014 16:17, Gabriele Brambilla
wrote:
> Doesn't exist a way in Python to do like in C
>
> for i=0, i<100, i=i+10
>
> ? without creating a list of index?
You haven't said which Python version you're using. In Python 2 the
range function returns a list but the xrange function returns
thanks,
in the end I'm using something like this and it works:
zipPARApha = zip(Pampli, Pgamma, Pecut, Pb, g)
for n, (a1,b1,c1,d1,pha) in enumerate(zipPARApha):
where the arguments of zip are lists of the same size.
Gabriele
2014-02-17 11:19 GMT-05:00 Oscar Benjamin :
> On 17 February 2014 1
On 17/02/2014 16:17, Gabriele Brambilla wrote:
Doesn't exist a way in Python to do like in C
for i=0, i<100, i=i+10
? without creating a list of index?
Gabriele
2014-02-17 11:15 GMT-05:00 David Palao mailto:dpalao.pyt...@gmail.com>>:
Hi Gabriele,
Without knowing the details of what
On 02/17/2014 08:05 AM, Gabriele Brambilla wrote:
Hi,
I'm wondering how I can (if I can) make a for loop in which I don't use all
the elements.
for example
a100 = list(range(100))
for a in a100:
print(a)
it print out to me all the numbers from 0 to 99
But if I want to display o
0, 9, 19, 29, 39, is not every 10th index
If you want to output every 10th. index try:
a100 = list(range(0,100,10))
for a in a100:
print(a)
-Original Message-
From: Gabriele Brambilla
To: python tutor
Sent: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 16:06
Subject: [Tutor] for: how to ski
Gabriele Brambilla wrote:
>it's because my problem is not so simple:
>imagine that in a100 contains not integer sorted in a good way but a
>random float numbers.
>How could I display only one item every 10?
You can provide a step size if you slice a list:
>>> l = list(range(10))
>>> l[0:10:2]
[0
On 02/17/2014 06:44 AM, Khalid Al-Ghamdi wrote:
Hi,
Why is it i can use mu custom class exception without creating an exception
object first?
Thanks
1. class ShortInputException(Exception): def __init__(self, length,
atleast):
2. Exception.__init__(self)
3. se
Oscar Benjamin Wrote in message:
> On 17 February 2014 13:16, Dave Angel wrote:
>> On 02/17/2014 06:12 AM, Oscar Benjamin wrote:
>>>
>>> Something like this:
>>>
>>> with open(r'D:\file3.txt', 'r+') as fout:
>>> keywords_seen = set()
>>> for filename in r'C:\File1.txt', r'C:\File2.txt'
Gabriele Brambilla Wrote in message:
> in the end I'm using something like this and it works:
> zipPARApha = zip(Pampli, Pgamma, Pecut, Pb, g)
> for n, (a1,b1,c1,d1,pha) in enumerate(zipPARApha):
> where the arguments of zip are lists of the same size.
Simpler would be:
for a1,b1,c1,d1,pha
Hello python tutors,
I am utilizing a 3rd party numerical minimization routine. This routine
requires an input function, which takes as arguments, only the variables with
which to solve for. But I don’t want to define all possible input functions,
in a giant switch, but rather, if I know I am
On Feb 17, 2014 7:24 PM, ""André Walker-Loud
""
wrote:
>
> Question 1:
> Is there a better way to accomplish (my hopefully clear) goals?
I'm not sure that there is given the constraints you're under from the
third party function.
> Question 2:
> In method 1, is there a way t
André Walker-Loud wrote:
> Hello python tutors,
>
> I am utilizing a 3rd party numerical minimization routine. This routine
> requires an input function, which takes as arguments, only the variables
> with which to solve for. But I don’t want to define all possible input
> functions, in a gian
Albert-Jan Roskam writes:
> I know what it does
> (http://docs.python.org/2/using/cmdline.html#envvar-PYTHONDONTWRITEBYTECODE),
> i.e. no pyc or pyo fiules are written, but WHY is that sometimes a
> good thing?
There are numerous reasons why one might not want files to suddenly be
written when a
On 17 February 2014 20:13, Peter Otten <__pete...@web.de> wrote:
> André Walker-Loud wrote:
>>
>> The 3rd party minimizer utilizes the .func_code.co_varnames and
>> .func_code.co_argcount to determine the name and number of variables to
>> minimize. eg.
>>
>> =
>> METHOD 2: use strings, e
Hi Oscar,
Let me clear up my description of one point - I don’t want to pick on the third
party software guys.
> The "right" solution is to change the interface of the third party function.
> It is poorly designed and should not be inspecting those function attributes
> or it should at least p
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 07:58:00PM +, Oscar Benjamin wrote:
> The "right" solution is to change the interface of the third party
> function. It is poorly designed and should not be inspecting those function
> attributes or it should at least provide an option for you to provide that
> informat
Peter Otten <__pete...@web.de> Wrote in message:
> André Walker-Loud wrote:
>
>> Hello python tutors,
>>
>> I am utilizing a 3rd party numerical minimization routine. This routine
>> requires an input function, which takes as arguments, only the variables
>> with which to solve for. But I do
Ian D writes:
> is
> import longModuleName as lmn
>
> or
>
> lmn = longModuleName
>
> creating an alias or assigning to a variable. or both?
Assignment and import both bind a name to an object. NAmes are one
(common) kind of reference. The only way to get at objects is by using a
re
On 17 February 2014 21:18, "André Walker-Loud "
wrote:
>
> What I am trying to avoid is having to write a special case for each order of
> polynomial I want. I tried the following
>
> def poly(x,pars):
> val = 0.
> for i,ci in enumerate(pars):
> val += x**i * ci
> return val
> This particular case is easily solved:
>
> def f_lambda(x,pars):
> return lambda x: poly(x,*pars)
>
> You let the closure take care of pars and return a function that takes
> exactly one argument x.
Hi Oscar,
This is the opposite of what I am trying to do. In the example, x represents
t
On 17 February 2014 22:15, "André Walker-Loud "
wrote:
>> This particular case is easily solved:
>>
>> def f_lambda(x,pars):
>> return lambda x: poly(x,*pars)
>>
>> You let the closure take care of pars and return a function that takes
>> exactly one argument x.
>
> Hi Oscar,
>
> This is the o
On 17 February 2014 22:15, "André Walker-Loud "
wrote:
>> This particular case is easily solved:
>>
>> def f_lambda(x,pars):
>> return lambda x: poly(x,*pars)
>>
>> You let the closure take care of pars and return a function that takes
>> exactly one argument x.
>
> Hi Oscar,
>
> This is the o
Hi Oscar,
On Feb 17, 2014, at 6:02 PM, Oscar Benjamin wrote:
> On 17 February 2014 22:15, "André Walker-Loud "
> wrote:
>>> This particular case is easily solved:
>>>
>>> def f_lambda(x,pars):
>>>return lambda x: poly(x,*pars)
>>>
>>> You let the closure take care of pars and return a fun
Hi Oscar,
On Feb 17, 2014, at 7:03 PM, Oscar Benjamin wrote:
> On 17 February 2014 22:15, "André Walker-Loud "
> wrote:
>>> This particular case is easily solved:
>>>
>>> def f_lambda(x,pars):
>>>return lambda x: poly(x,*pars)
>>>
>>> You let the closure take care of pars and return a fu
51 matches
Mail list logo