"Alex Hall" wrote
I am not sure how else to explain it. I want to loop until the value
of a variable changes, but while that loop is taking place, the user
should be able to perform actions set up in a wx.AcceleratorTable.
And here we have the critical clue. You are trying to write this
loop
On 7 June 2010 02:37, Alex Hall wrote:
> I am not sure how else to explain it. I want to loop until the value
> of a variable changes, but while that loop is taking place, the user
> should be able to perform actions set up in a wx.AcceleratorTable.
> Looping, though, causes Windows to tell me th
>answerDict=dict(map(lambda x: (str(x[1]),x[0]),map(lambda x: \
>> x.values(),Answer.objects.filter(fk_questionSet=1). \
>> filter(fk_question=1).values('widgetAnswer').order_by(). \
>> annotate(widgetCount=Count('widgetAnswer')
>>
>>
> The first time there
Hi all,
I know the difference between
class Parent :
class Parent(object) :
But in some softwares i recall seeing,
class Parent() :
Is this legal syntax?
With warm regards,
-Payal
--
___
Tutor maillist - Tutor@python.org
To unsubscribe or change
lol, for a second I thought this question comes from PayPal
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 10:01 AM, Payal wrote:
> Hi all,
> I know the difference between
> class Parent :
> class Parent(object) :
>
> But in some softwares i recall seeing,
> class Parent() :
>
> Is this legal syntax?
>
> With warm r
On 07/06/2010 01:44, Alex Hall wrote:
Further to the other comments that you've had, could you please refer to
the following, thanks.
http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
Kindest regards.
Mark Lawrence
___
Tutor maillist - Tutor@py
On 6/7/2010 10:01 AM, Payal wrote:
Hi all,
I know the difference between
class Parent :
class Parent(object) :
But in some softwares i recall seeing,
class Parent() :
Is this legal syntax?
Teach: To answer that question, just try it at the interactive prompt.
If it is not legal syntax y
Not the OP, but I was surprised to see class Name() work (in Python
2.6.5 at least).
Is this equivalent to class Name( object ) or does this create an old
style class?
Going forward into the 2.7/3.x world, is there a preferred style?
Thanks,
Malcolm
__
On 07/06/2010 16:12, pyt...@bdurham.com wrote:
Not the OP, but I was surprised to see class Name() work (in Python
2.6.5 at least).
Is this equivalent to class Name( object ) or does this create an old
style class?
Going forward into the 2.7/3.x world, is there a preferred style?
Thanks,
Malco
Hi Mark,
>> I was surprised to see class Name() work (in Python 2.6.5 at least). Is this
>> equivalent to class Name( object ) or does this create an old style class?
>> Going forward into the 2.7/3.x world, is there a preferred style?
> RTFM? :)
I am reading TFM :)
Here's why I'm confused. T
On Tue, 8 Jun 2010 01:12:28 am pyt...@bdurham.com wrote:
> Not the OP, but I was surprised to see class Name() work (in Python
> 2.6.5 at least).
>
> Is this equivalent to class Name( object ) or does this create an old
> style class?
In Python 2.x, all classes are old-style unless you directly or
On Tue, 8 Jun 2010 02:03:18 am pyt...@bdurham.com wrote:
> Here's why I'm confused. The following paragraph from TFM seems to
> indicate that old style classes are the default:
Yes, if you don't inherit from object, or another class that inherits
from object (like the built-ins), you get an old-
On 07/06/2010 17:03, pyt...@bdurham.com wrote:
Hi Mark,
I was surprised to see class Name() work (in Python 2.6.5 at least). Is this
equivalent to class Name( object ) or does this create an old style class?
Going forward into the 2.7/3.x world, is there a preferred style?
RTFM? :)
I am
> In Python 2.x, all classes are old-style unless you directly or indirectly
> inherit from object. If you inherit from nothing, it is an old-style class
> regardless of whether you say class Name: pass or class Name(): pass. In
> Python 3.x, there are no old-style classes.
Thanks Steven!
Malc
Steven,
Thanks again for your explanations. I thought I had missed a major
change in Python class behavior - relieved to find that I'm up-to-date.
Cheers,
Malcolm
___
Tutor maillist - Tutor@python.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
htt
Hi Mark,
> I see that Stephen D'Aprano has already replied twice so I won't bother.
> Apart from that no offence meant, I hope none taken.
Your RTFM reply actually gave me a good laugh. No (zero) offence taken.
And I appreciate your many helpful posts in these forums.
Cheers,
Malcolm
__
Just out of curiosity does anyone know why you get a deprecation warning if
you pass a float to range but if you use round, which returns a float, there
is no warning?
Python 2.6.4 (r264:75708, Oct 26 2009, 08:23:19) [MSC v.1500 32 bit (Intel)]
on
win32
Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "lice
Hi all,
I think that simply erasing those "continue" statements will let Python
respond again. Those statements are both useless and damaging, because
the following "time.sleep(.1)" statements will NEVER be executed. And
this, in turn, is IMHO the reason why Python stops responding: it lacks
t
On 07/06/2010 17:30, pyt...@bdurham.com wrote:
Hi Mark,
I see that Stephen D'Aprano has already replied twice so I won't bother. Apart
from that no offence meant, I hope none taken.
Your RTFM reply actually gave me a good laugh. No (zero) offence taken.
And I appreciate your many helpful pos
> Just out of curiosity does anyone know why you get a deprecation warning if
> you pass a float to range but if you use round, which returns a float, there
> is no warning?
It has nothing to do with the round.
It's just that the warning is only shown once:
$ python
Python 2.6.5 (r265:79063, Ap
Hi,
If I have a list (or a dict), is there any way of knowing how many other
variables are referencing the same object?
With warm regards,
-Payal
--
___
Tutor maillist - Tutor@python.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
http://mail.py
On Tue, Jun 08, 2010 at 02:11:10AM +1000, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> In Python 2.x, all classes are old-style unless you directly or
> indirectly inherit from object. If you inherit from nothing, it is an
> old-style class regardless of whether you say
>
> class Name: pass
>
> or
>
> class Nam
Hi,
I have open url and read like following:
$import urllib
$txt = urllib.urlopen("http://www.terme-catez.si";).read()
$txt
Gives output like below:
other parts are skipped ---
r\n 2010\r\n http://www.terme-catez.si";
target="_blank">Terme
\xc4\x8cate\xc5\xbe\r\n Slovenija\r\
23 matches
Mail list logo
