Dear all,
I have a Problem with complex strings as keys in a shelve Object:
#!/usr/bin/python
import shelve
test=shelve.open('testshelve')
test={
'CCN1c2c2/C(=C2/S/C(=N\c3ccc(Cl)cc3)N(C)C2=O)C1=O':int(0),
'CN1/C(=N\c2ccc(Cl)cc2)S/C(=C2\C(=O)Nc3c32)C1=O':int(20),
'c1cc2c(cc1)N(CCCl)C(=O)/C2
Well, the only thing more annoying than off topic discussion is "meta"
discussion on lists and folks passing judgement on other people's
posts (ie. you should have x, your should not have Y... I shouldn't
have this second doughnut, but you know what, i am gonna eat that
*and* have a second
I actually find the map biz easier to get my head around than the list
comp. I guess this makes it another good reason for me to be happy
that map is apparently staying in after nearly being depreciated. I
generally prefer list comp in every instance, but the idea of an if
else construct wi
On Sat, Sep 5, 2009 at 10:52 AM, Jojo Mwebaze wrote:
> oooh that will be helpful, kindly point me to how i can begin with getting
> a sub-image that has the same width as the
> original. That will be my starting point.
I don't know the details of FITS format, but I imagine it would be
something
On Sun, Sep 6, 2009 at 6:20 AM, markus kossner wrote:
> Dear all,
> I have a Problem with complex strings as keys in a shelve Object:
>
> #!/usr/bin/python
> import shelve
> test=shelve.open('testshelve')
> test={
> 'CCN1c2c2/C(=C2/S/C(=N\c3ccc(Cl)cc3)N(C)C2=O)C1=O':int(0),
> 'CN1/C(=N\c2ccc(C
So far, I can use tuples/lists/dictionary's, and define some functions,
and a bit of other things.
Would it be hard for me to make a simple text rpg game? Or is there
something else I should know before I try that.
___
Tutor maillist - Tutor@python.o
Hi Corey,
If this is going to be a command line program, two things that immediately
come to mind for me are: validating user input and persistence. If you put
something like "(1) to attack, (2) to run" what if the user types "yes", or
"Y", or "9"? You'll want to make sure your program doesn't cra
Hi All,
Hope the people in the US are having a nice Labor Day! I am looking for
the source code
for the pack/unpack functions found in the struct package. As of this email,
I have tried a
strings on the struct.pyc file. The inspection of the pyc file was hoping
that I could find a
stub to the
On Sun, Sep 6, 2009 at 3:20 PM, Tino Dai wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Hope the people in the US are having a nice Labor Day! I am looking for
> the source code
> for the pack/unpack functions found in the struct package. As of this
> email, I have tried a
> strings on the struct.pyc file. The inspect
I have been trying how to get a any python program to run by clicking on
the icon. I keep reading on the internet make it executable:
chmod a+x try_python.py
Where do I actually put the above expression so that it will work
everytime. If I then sent this try_python.py to someone else with
Hope the people in the US are having a nice Labor Day! I am looking for
the source code
for the pack/unpack functions found in the struct package. As of this
email, I have tried a
strings on the struct.pyc file. The inspection of the pyc file was hoping
that I could find a
stub to the source.
On Sun, Sep 6, 2009 at 2:20 PM, Tino Dai wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Hope the people in the US are having a nice Labor Day! I am looking for
> the source code
> for the pack/unpack functions found in the struct package. As of this email,
> I have tried a
> strings on the struct.pyc file. The inspecti
On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 4:20 PM, sharon wrote:
> I have been trying how to get a any python program to run by clicking on
> the icon. I keep reading on the internet make it executable:
>
> chmod a+x try_python.py
>
Did you write:
#!/usr/bin/env python
at the first line of the file too?
> Wher
"sharon" wrote
I have been trying how to get a any python program to run by clicking on
the icon. I keep reading on the internet make it executable:
chmod a+x try_python.py
You do this in a console window, at a bash prompt.
You also need to add the "shebang" line at the top of the file.
"Corey Richardson" wrote
So far, I can use tuples/lists/dictionary's, and define some functions,
and a bit of other things.
Would it be hard for me to make a simple text rpg game? Or is there
something else I should know before I try that.
No idea about rpg because I've never played one fa
On Sun, Sep 6, 2009 at 10:21 AM, kevin parks wrote:
> Well, the only thing more annoying than off topic discussion is "meta"
> discussion on lists and folks passing judgement on other people's posts (ie.
> you should have x, your should not have Y... I shouldn't have this second
> doughnut, but y
thanks a lot .
cheers
Johnson
On Sun, Sep 6, 2009 at 4:23 PM, Kent Johnson wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 5, 2009 at 10:52 AM, Jojo Mwebaze
> wrote:
> > oooh that will be helpful, kindly point me to how i can begin with
> getting
> > a sub-image that has the same width as the
> > original. That will
"Corey Richardson" wrote
So far, I can use tuples/lists/dictionary's, and define some functions,
and a bit of other things.
Would it be hard for me to make a simple text rpg game? Or is there
something else I should know before I try that.
No idea about rpg because I've never pl
>
>
>> Ummm, whats a branch? Haha, I know loops, but not branches.
>
A branch changes the program flow based on a condition.
Example:
x = int(raw_input("Please enter a number!"))
if x > 10:
print "Your number was greater than 10!"
else:
print "Your number was less than or equal to 10!"
___
"Luke Paireepinart" wrote
I agree, but I can see how some people don't like it. It's similar to
the
Java vs. C++ debate I guess, Java is forced OO and C++ is optional.
While this is a genuine complaint for Java I have to be fair and say
that Ruby does a good job of hiding its OOP purity w
"Corey Richardson" wrote
then you can program anything since sequences, loops and
branches are all that are necessary to program anything!
Ummm, whats a branch? Haha, I know loops, but not branches.
Branches are if/else statements and case statements and jump
or goto statements. In Pytho
21 matches
Mail list logo
