Chris Hengge wrote:
> I hope this is related enough for this thread, but I'm curious why
> people didn't seem to unanimously jump into 2.5 upon release. Python
> seems very good about holding its backward compatibility vs some other
> languages I've dealt with like C# that seems to require appli
"Isaac" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
> Without communicate()[0] the screen is blank and no prompt.
Ah. I see.
OK, Thanks for clarifying that.
I should have tried both versions, I only checked that my version
did, in fact, clear the screen, I didn't check how yours
behaved - naughty!
Alan G.
__
"Chris Hengge" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
>...I'm curious why people didn't seem to unanimously jump
> into 2.5 upon release.
I can't speak for anyone else, but personally I never load the
first version of any software. I only upgrade when I find a
feature I actually know I need and after I'm
wesley chun wrote:
> below is a quick summary of the 2.5 highlights. of these, i like/use
> the following:
> 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, (8), 9a, 9b.
>
> 7) Enhanced Generator Features (PEP 342) -- now you can "talk-back" to
> a generator, meaning you can send data into it as you resume it...
> .next() se
>http://www.velocityreviews.com/forums/t343990-xmlrpc-send-file.html
>
>Using this example I get error's about 'expected binary .read(), but got
>instance instead.
I assume you are using this ...
>d = xmlrpclib.Binary(open("C:\\somefile.exe").read())
Are you using windows?
I think you would n
* Chris Hengge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [061229 02:25]:
>I hope this is related enough for this thread, but I'm curious why people
>didn't seem to unanimously jump into 2.5 upon release. Python seems very
>good about holding its backward compatibility vs some other languages I've
>dealt
Chris Hengge wrote:
> I hope this is related enough for this thread, but I'm curious why
> people didn't seem to unanimously jump into 2.5 upon release.
If I'm driving a 2006 model car, I don't rush right out and trade for a
2007 model just because they are available.
There's cost and effort in
Chris Calloway wrote:
> Generators now have a different syntax, so some applications would need
> some updating in order to take advantage of 2.5.
The old syntax still works. "yield x" is now an expression returning a
value, rather than a statement, so it can be used in new ways, but a
plain "y
Kent Johnson wrote:
> wesley chun wrote:
>
>> below is a quick summary of the 2.5 highlights. of these, i like/use
>> the following:
>> 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, (8), 9a, 9b.
>>
>> 7) Enhanced Generator Features (PEP 342) -- now you can "talk-back" to
>> a generator, meaning you can send data into it
Message: 1
Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2006 17:24:41 -0800
From: "Chris Hengge" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [Tutor] OT: Python 2.5 (Was Re: Length of longest item in
I hope this is related enough for this thread, but I'm curious why people
didn't seem to unanimously jump into 2.5 upon release.
One
I read something about reload of modules.
#test.py
from ABC import M # M is an attribute of Module ABC
if I change module ABC, I need import ABC and reload ABC before "from
ABC import M" work. in IDLE, I just click F5 and run the code, it
works and does not need type anything like "Import ABC",
"R
On Fri, 29 Dec 2006, linda.s wrote:
> I read something about reload of modules.
> #test.py
> from ABC import M # M is an attribute of Module ABC
>
> if I change module ABC, I need import ABC and reload ABC before "from
> ABC import M" work. in IDLE, I just click F5 and run the code, it works
>
Danny Yoo wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Dec 2006, linda.s wrote:
>
>
>> I read something about reload of modules.
>> #test.py
>> from ABC import M # M is an attribute of Module ABC
>>
>> if I change module ABC, I need import ABC and reload ABC before "from
>> ABC import M" work. in IDLE, I just click F5
What is the best way for someone who is not very efficient in
mathematics to learn Python, I was turned away from C++ and others
because of the math issue. Ruby has been recommended as well.
___
Tutor maillist - Tutor@python.org
http://mail.python.
I'm not exactly a math guru, either, but know some algebra & geometry
from school.
When I first tried my hand at Python, I started with just the tutorial
bundled with the Python download.
I had been taken a semester in Pascal & tinkered with Perl & Java at
that point, and found Python to be simpl
"Daniel kavic" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
> What is the best way for someone who is not very efficient in
> mathematics to learn Python,
You don't need math to program, but it definitely helps and
for some problems is essential. But the level of math required
is not high, definitely sub coll
> Actually, if you have IDLE in the default setup on Windows and you
> right-click something to edit it,
> IDLE doesn't open a subprocess each time a script is executed, so it
> will keep the imports in between runs of the program.
Hi Luke,
Ah, thanks for the correction.
_
I might have been unclear, or this tid-bit might have been lost in the
thread... but I'm trying to send directly from ImageGrab.Grab(), without
saving the data as a file. Thats where I'm getting hung... If it try to send
an actual stored file, I have no problem. Is this maybe impossible? My
though
On 12/29/06, Danny Yoo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Actually, if you have IDLE in the default setup on Windows and you
> > right-click something to edit it,
> > IDLE doesn't open a subprocess each time a script is executed, so it
> > will keep the imports in between runs of the program.
>
> Hi Lu
19 matches
Mail list logo
