hello everyone, and thanks for your help and
guidance so far.
amazingly enough, something i thought would be
simple has turned out to be not simple.
i have a sword that i want to wield. as i have it
here, i think i am wielding whatever string i type
as argument to wield. so i guess i need to
I used Kent's hints and suggestions
but now I'm facing a problem of how to calculate final results from the
retrieved data. My script, at this stage, opens _all_ game results files,
gets an individual player's name, calculates his score and keeps the number
of boards played. It does it per _each
Hello,I try to call setup build and found this problem:running buildrunning build_ext*** Failed: error: The .NET Framework SDK needs to be installed before building extensions for Python.I have .NET Framework SDK already.
Is there anyone experiance this problem ?I also found some information about
Good morning,
Does anyone know of something that will copy a directory
tree, but only for files with a specific extension? I found
copytree(
src, dst[,
symlinks])
, but I wasn’t sure how to assign the src to the
string, ie) \\server\share\*.xls.
Thanks,
Roberts, Alice wrote:
> Good morning,
>
> Does anyone know of something that will copy a directory tree, but
> only for files with a specific extension? I found
>
> *copytree*(
>
>
>
> /src, dst/[/, symlinks/])
>
> , but I wasn’t sure how to assign the src to the string, ie)
> \\server\sh
Josh Yagy wrote:
>I have the following code:
>
>def binaryString(b, n):
> s=[]
> j=0
> while j < len(b):
> temp = b[j:j+n]
> s = s + [ temp ]
> j = j + n
> return s
>
>which works for all intents and purposes, but I can't figure out
> hello everyone, and thanks for your help and guidance so far. amazingly
> enough, something i thought would be simple has turned out to be not
> simple. i have a sword that i want to wield. as i have it here, i think
> i am wielding whatever string i type as argument to wield. so i guess i
> ne
> i guess i need to pass wield an object somehow instead of a string.
> can anyone point in the right direction?
AS ever converting strings to objects is a job for a doictionary. And
remember that classe3s are objects too.
So simply register each class you define in a dictionary of classes again
Hi Kishra,
In the words of the old joke(*) why not just 'get out and get back in' and
see if that fixes it? In other words I'd try a reinstall of Python, it looks
like something has gone missing or got corrupted...
Alan G.
(*)Three guys are in a car that breaks down. The first says "I'm an
Elect
Wow, that code is much more compact, thanks for the help! But as far as the
original question goes, I think I worded my problem wrong. The output you got
with your binary string is almost what I Want, but not quite. I need each
subset of binary strings to be n bits long (in the dummy problem you
Josh Yagy wrote:
>Wow, that code is much more compact, thanks for the help! But as far as the
>original question goes, I think I worded my problem wrong. The output you got
>with your binary string is almost what I Want, but not quite. I need each
>subset of binary strings to be n bits long (in
On 06/12/05, Josh Yagy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Wow, that code is much more compact, thanks for the help! But as far as the
> original
> question goes, I think I worded my problem wrong. The output you got with
> your binary string
> is almost what I Want, but not quite. I need each subset of
Hi folks,
How do I pass a list by value to a function.
The foll: snippet of code produces the output as shown:
Code:
-
def junk(x):
x.append("20")
return x
a = ["10"]
b = junk(a)
print b
print a
Output:
---
>>>
b = ['10', '20']
a = ['10', '20']
This indicates that the
Thanks guys
Yes either of the foll solves the
problem:
b = junk(copy.copy(a))
OR
b =
junk(a[:])
Why is there a difference between the way the
two lines (x.append("20") and x = "30") are handled within a
function?
From: Adam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, 6 December 2
On 06/12/05, Hans Dushanthakumar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Thanks guys
>
> Yes either of the foll solves the problem:
>
> b = junk(copy.copy(a))
>
> OR
>
> b = junk(a[:])
One thing you should be aware of --- these will both do a "shallow copy".
Example:
>>> lists = [[], [], [], []]
>>> lis
Hans Dushanthakumar wrote:
> Thanks guys
>
> Yes either of the foll solves the problem:
>
> b = junk(copy.copy(a))
> OR
>
> b = junk(a[:])
These work because they make a copy of a and pass (a reference to) the
copy to the function.
> Why is there a difference between the way the two line
suppose you have a list of words and you
want to unambiguously identify
each word in the list with the shortest number of
characters.
for instance a list like : kill, kiss,
take
i would want to get take just by typing
t.
but you would have to type kil or kis to get kill
or kiss.
where shoul
On 06/12/05, david <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> suppose you have a list of words and you want to unambiguously identify
> each word in the list with the shortest number of characters.
> for instance a list like : kill, kiss, take
> i would want to get take just by typing t.
> but you would have to
> > suppose you have a list of words and you want to unambiguously identify
> > each word in the list with the shortest number of characters.
> > for instance a list like : kill, kiss, take
> > i would want to get take just by typing t.
> > but you would have to type kil or kis to get kill or kiss
hello,
how can i connect python to read data from ms access or ms foxpro?
regards,
Gregor
___
Dibuka pendaftaran Program Magister dan Double Degree Pascasarjana UAJY
(MM - MTF atau sebaliknya; M.Hum - MTF; M.Hum - MM; MTS. - MM
20 matches
Mail list logo
