On Feb 16, 2014, at 6:08 PM, Guy Harris wrote:
> On Feb 14, 2014, at 7:41 PM, Chris Kilgour wrote:
>
>> It seems some folks choose little-endian for multi-byte fields and others
>> choose network/big-endian. It there a preference here? Is it acceptable to
>> define these fields as having t
> The current versions of
>
> http://www.whiterocker.com/bt/LINKTYPE_BLUETOOTH_BREDR_BB.html
>
> and
>
> http://www.whiterocker.com/bt/LINKTYPE_BLUETOOTH_LE_LL_WITH_PHDR.html
>
> say "All multi-octet fields are expressed in little-endian format." I
> presume that means that's now
