Guy Harris wrote:
> This is definitely an argument in favor of distributing the configure
> script - not just the source files that generate the configure script -
> as part of the release tarball.
> It also might be considered an argument in favor of not having the
> genera
On Sep 23, 2013, at 11:45 AM, Michael Richardson wrote:
> But it means that anyone who checks out code from git is foobar if they can
> not get the *correct* version of autoconf installed to generate the files.
So, if it's possible to do so, perhaps we should have a post-commit/post-push
hook
