Re: [SM-USERS] mailbox refresh to wrong mail folder on select of unread message

2010-06-26 Thread Paul Lesniewski
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 1:30 AM, Patrick Bos wrote: > Hi all, > I'm playing around with SQ1.5.2 20100624 and have noticed that when you're > in a mail folder other than Inbox and you click on an unread message to read > it, the mailbox refreshes to change the status of that message from unread > t

Re: [SM-USERS] different identity behaviour (1.5.2)

2010-06-26 Thread Patrick Bos
I want this functionality because I want to use 1 email address in 1 domain to function as a support mailbox to which people can send support request. People can send mail to email addresses based on recipients names and other support techies can still open that mail and respond with the correct

Re: [SM-USERS] different identity behaviour (1.5.2)

2010-06-26 Thread Paul Lesniewski
Please do not top-post. Please reply to my message and not your original one. Please do READ the posting guidelines that your were asked to when you subscribed. >> Hi all, >> >> I'm trying to get SM1.5.2 not to use identities that were pre made but to >> use the original to address from the ori

Re: [SM-USERS] different identity behaviour (1.5.2)

2010-06-26 Thread Patrick Bos
No need to get like that. I can't help it that I didn't get your post by email and the only way to respond was by top posting! Anyway, is this a place where we can discuss stuff like what I posted or what? Verstuurd vanaf mijn iPhone Op 26 jun. 2010 om 14:25 heeft Paul Lesniewski het volgend

Re: [SM-USERS] different identity behaviour (1.5.2)

2010-06-26 Thread Patrick Bos
Tell you what, in my opinion the multiple identity function works like crap and I'm not backing down from that opinion just because developers who possibly have huge ego's won't fix it if I don't bend over for them. Simple as that. The multiple identity system works like crap because in SM it's

Re: [SM-USERS] different identity behaviour (1.5.2)

2010-06-26 Thread Tomas Kuliavas
Patrick Bos wrote: > > Tell you what, > > in my opinion the multiple identity function works like crap and I'm not > backing down from that opinion just because developers who possibly have > huge ego's won't fix it if I don't bend over for them. Simple as that. > > The multiple identity syste