Hi there,
I'm testing facet performance with vs without docValues in Solr 4.7, and
found that on first request, performance with docValues is much faster than
non-docValues. However, for subsequent requests (where the queries are
cached), the performance is slower for docValues than non-docValues.
, 2015 at 11:18 AM, lei wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I'm testing facet performance with vs without docValues in Solr 4.7, and
> found that on first request, performance with docValues is much faster
> than non-docValues. However, for subsequent requests (where the queries are
> cach
; wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have one consideration on top of my head, would you mind to show a brief
> snapshot by a sampler?
>
> On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 10:18 PM, lei wrote:
>
> > Hi there,
> >
> > I'm testing facet performance with vs without docValues in
The Solr instance is single-shard. Index size is around 20G and total doc #
is about 12 million. Below are the histograms for the three facet fields in
my query. Thanks.
On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 11:57 PM, Toke Eskildsen
wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-03-05 at 21:14 +0100, lei wrote:
>
> You
Sure, here is the link to the image of term histograms. Thanks.
https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1tma4hkYjxJfBTnMbO6Pq_dUHqZ0wI_UTlgoVqXtW4ZA/edit?usp=sharing
On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 10:56 AM, Anshum Gupta
wrote:
> Hi Lei,
>
> The mailing list doesn't allow attachments.
The term histograms are shared in this link. Sorry for the confusion.
https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1tma4hkYjxJfBTnMbO6Pq_dUHqZ0wI_UTlgoVqXtW4ZA/pub?start=false&loop=false&delayms=3000&slide=id.p
> On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 10:56 AM, Anshum Gupta
> wrote:
>
>>
Hi there,
I'm using Solr 4.7 and find the fast vector highlighter is not as fast as
it used to be in solr 3.x. It seems the results are not cached, even after
several hits of the same query, it still takes dozens of milliseconds to
return. Any idea or solution is appreciated. Thanks.
Hi guys,
Currently I am running a 2 nodes cloud of Solr 7.5, I already have a
collection named A and it worked fine with 20GB index Data, while I want to
create a collection named B and want to copy index data from A.
So in Solr5.5, I just copy index folder from A and renamed to B. restart
solr cl
This is weird, when we creating an index, Solr will make sure shards of an
index be distributed to all the existing nodes evenly. But after you used
'UTILIZENODE' of AutoScale, Solr will try to put all the shards of an index
to one or several nodes. Is this intentional or a bug?
For example, we ha
Hi Erick,
I understand this is how the file handler works.
But for the SolrCloud users, they didn't see the expected replica failover
happens, then we can not say SolrCloud is totally HA enabled. Do we have plan
to handle the HA for disk failures? Thanks.
Regards,
Radar
From: Amy Bai
Date: W
10 matches
Mail list logo
