Solr json facet API contains option

2017-10-20 Thread kenny
feature. Is it production ready? Where can I find an up to date description? Right now my only resource is http://yonik.com/json-facet-api/ Thanks Kenny

Solr facets counts deep paged returns inconsistent counts

2017-10-20 Thread kenny
ud mode (3 shards) in non-json facet module Any-one seen ths before? I could not find any bug reported like this. Thanks Kenny

Re: Solr facets counts deep paged returns inconsistent counts

2017-10-20 Thread kenny
erent offsets: for example the range of constraints [0,500] and [500,1000] might contain the same constraint. Kenny On 20-10-17 17:12, Yonik Seeley wrote: Facet refinement in Solr guarantees that counts for returned constraints are correct, but does not guarantee that the top N returned isn'

Nested facet complete wrong counts

2017-11-10 Thread kenny
rms\",\"field\":\"Gender_sf\",\"missing\":true,\"refine\":true,\"overrequest\":10,\"limit\":10,\"offset\":0,\"facet\":{\"Status_sf\":{\"type\":\"terms\",\"field\":\"Status_sf\",\"missing\":true,\"refine\":true,\"overrequest\":50,\"limit\":50,\"offset\":0}}},\"Gender_sfhll\":\"hll(Gender_sf)\"}","q":"*:*","fq":["type:\"something\""]} Is this a known bug? Would switching to old facet api resolve this? Are there other parameters we miss? Thanks kenny

Re: Nested facet complete wrong counts

2017-11-11 Thread Kenny Knecht
Thank you. But as I showed in my example we used refine and overrequest is not strictly needed because we need all buckets anyway. But that can hardly explain an error of 60%, right? Op 10-nov.-2017 19:29 schreef "Amrit Sarkar" : > Kenny, > > This is a known behavior in multi

Re: Nested facet complete wrong counts

2017-11-11 Thread Kenny Knecht
e sum all the values of Type with the same Gender and compare these sums with the numbers of previous request. These numbers differ by 60% which is quite worrying. Not always it depends on the facet, but still. Did you get any reports like this? Thanks Kenny Op 11-nov.-2017 01:47 schreef "Yo

Re: Nested facet complete wrong counts

2017-11-11 Thread Kenny Knecht
RRGG - [banging my head against the wall] Of course. You are abolutely right about the multi valuedness Thanks for the 7.0 hint. Gives a reason to upgrade. Need to re-index when upgrading? Kenny [image: ONTOFORCE] <http://www.ontoforce.com/> Kenny Knecht, PhD CTO and technical lead +

Individual query limits for each search field value

2008-07-31 Thread Kenny Lee
to limit the results of each city to let's say 10, via solr/lucene query, or would i have to make separate calls for each city, with the limit 10 like select?q=cities=NYC&limit=10 select?q=cities=LAS&limit=10 select?q=cities=MIA&limit=10 select?q=cities=SFO&limit=10 Best Wishes, Kenny