Hahahaha ... Good 1
On 20/07/2013, at 1:43 AM, "Jack Krupansky" wrote:
> real_soon:[NOW+3DAYS TO NOW+10DAYS]
>
> -- Jack Krupansky
>
> -Original Message- From: Jabouille Jean Charles
> Sent: Friday, July 19, 2013 11:10 AM
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Date for 4.4 solr r
do you have a script/data that makes this happen?
I'm on a windows dev box - it does not get "too many open files" but
i'll figure it out.
ryan
sweet.
the logging is java logging... (not one i really know how to deal with)
Can you try setting system property like this:
http://www.exampledepot.com/egs/java.util.logging/Props.html
Brian Whitman wrote:
I'm trying to disable all logging from Solr, or at least re-route it to
a file.
I
One way to solve the issue may be to create another field to group the value in
a range, so you have fewer facet values to query.
Sent from my iPhone
On Nov 5, 2013, at 4:31 AM, Erick Erickson wrote:
> You're just going to have to accept it being slow. Think of it this way:
> you have
> 4M (sa
Rohit - for debugging hangs you will can trigger platfom specific dump and
analyze it.
On Sep 3, 2011, at 9:39 AM, "Rohit" wrote:
> Thanks Simon, did get that part, it was happening because solr was not able
> to reserve enough memory when it had hung once. The server has 24G of memory
> and
http://www.lucidimagination.com/content/scaling-lucene-and-solr
Has good guidance.
Wrt 1. What is the issue - mem, cpu or query perf or indexing process
On Nov 20, 2011, at 11:39 AM, Lalit Kumar 4 wrote:
> Hello:
> We recently have seen performance issues of SOLR (running on jetty).
>
> W
hi, guys
when u using dataimport handler to import index , it's ok.
but later when data is became bigger and bigger , i found using dataimport
handler is very slow . it costs nearly 20 mins.
So i try using another way to build index . using script to put data into csv
file then import to so
Hello, Mikhail.
Each index record looks like:
DIR:true
PATH:/root/folder1/folder2/
NAME:folder3
SIZE:0
...
This record represents folder /root/folder1/folder2/folder3
DIR:false
PATH:/root/folder1/folder2/folder3/
NAME:image.jpg
SIZE:1234567
...
This is a file /root/folder1/folder2/folder3/imag
I need to sort a query two ways. Should I do the search one way:
s.getDocListAndSet(query, restrictions, sort, req.getStart(),
req.getLimit(), flags);
then do the same search again with a different sort value or is there a
method available to just sort the DocSet (like sortDocSet but it's
prote
I'm having slow performance with my solr index. I'm not sure what to do. I
need some suggestions on what to try. I have updated all my records in the
last couple of days. I'm not sure how much it degraded because of that, but
it now takes about 3 seconds per search. My cache statistics don't loo
Sorry.. I put the wrong subject on my message. I also wanted to mention that
my cpu jumps to to almost 100% each query.
I'm having slow performance with my solr index. I'm not sure what to do. I
need some suggestions on what to try. I have updated all my records in the
last couple of days. I'm
There's nothing wrong with CPU jumping to 100% each query, that just
means you aren't IO bound :-)
What do you mean not IO bound?
>- I did an optimize index through Luke with compound format and
> noticed
> in the solrconfig file that useCompoundFile is set to false.
Don't do this unle
M
Subject: Re: Performance issue.
On 12/5/06, Gmail Account <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There's nothing wrong with CPU jumping to 100% each query, that just
> means you aren't IO bound :-)
What do you mean not IO bound?
There is always going to be a bottleneck somewhere
the facet counts (it will use the FieldCache rather than filters).
You would need to reindex to try this approach.
-Yonik
On 12/6/06, Gmail Account <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I reindexed and optimized and it helped. However now each query averages
about 1 second(down from 3-4 seconds). The bott
I know that I've seen this topic before.. Is there a guidline on the best
way to create tagging in solr? For example, keeping track of what user
tagged what item in solr. And facetting based on tags?
Thanks,
Mike
This would be great! I can't help with the solution but I am very
interested in using it if one of you guys can figure it out.
I can't wait to see if this works out.
Mike
- Original Message -
From: "Erik Hatcher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2007 4:51 AM
Subj
I use solr for searching and facets and love it.. The performance is
awesome.
However I am about to add tagging to my application and I'm having a hard
time deciding if I should just database my tags for now until a better solr
solution is worked out... Does anyone know what technology some of
I don't think Spatial search will fully fit into this. I have 2 approaches in
mind but I am not satisfied with either one of them.
a) Have 2 separate indexes. First one to store the information about all the
cities and second one to store the retail stores information. Whenever user
searches fo
AM, Erick Erickson wrote:
>>
>>> I don't see how this works, since your search for San could also return
>>> San Marino, Italy. Would you then return all retail stores in
>>> X miles of that city? What about San Salvador de Jujuy, Argentina?
>>>
&g
19 matches
Mail list logo
