Hi Folks,
Can anyone suggest me how can customize dataconfig.xml file
I want to provide database details like( db_url,uname,password ) from my own
properties file instead of dataconfig.xaml file
h.url=jdbc:url:something
See http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrConfigXml?#System_property_substitution
James Dyer
Ingram Content Group
(615) 213-4311
-Original Message-
From: Ramesh [mailto:ramesh.po...@vensaiinc.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2013 7:25 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subj
you.
James Dyer
Ingram Content Group
(615) 213-4311
-Original Message-
From: Ramesh [mailto:ramesh.po...@vensaiinc.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2013 9:00 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: Data Import Handler
James can elaborate how to process driver
Hi,
We are using the solr search, Sometimes due to this our entire system is
becoming slow. We didn't got any clue.. So we tried to test load & stress
test through the Jmeter. Here we have tried for many times with different
testing ways. At random times in Jmeter we are getting the following
m
Unable to deploying solr 4.4 on JBoss -4.0.0 I am getting error like
Use Mozilla for better use even in IE it is not working properly
-Original Message-
From: William Bell [mailto:billnb...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2013 12:02 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: solr4.4 admin page show "loading"
Use Chrome.
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013
Hi Erick,
We index around several million documents/ day and we optimize everyday
when the relative load is low. The reason we optimize is, we dont want the
index sizes to grow too large and auto optimzie to kick in. When auto
optimize kicks in, it results in unpredictable performance as it is CPU
> Here's a wonderful video about the process. you want the third one
> down (TieredMergePolicy) as that's the default.
>
>
> http://blog.mikemccandless.com/2011/02/visualizing-lucenes-segment-merges.html
>
> Best,
> Erick
>
> On Sun, Dec 20, 2015 at 8:26 PM,
Please have a look at this post
https://support.lucidworks.com/hc/en-us/articles/201298317-What-is-SolrCloud-And-how-does-it-compare-to-master-slave-
We dont use Master slave architecture, however we use solr cloud and
standalone solr for our documents.
Indexing is a bit slow in cloud when compa
We are facing some issue and we are finding it difficult to debug the
problem. We wanted to understand how solr commit works.
A background on our setup:
We have 3 Node Solr Cluster running in version 5.3.1. Its a index heavy
use case. In peak load, we index 400-500 documents/second.
We also want t
We are using Solr Cloud with replication factor of 2 and no of shards as
either 2 or 3.
Thanks,
Rahul
On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 4:43 PM, Alessandro Benedetti wrote:
> Let me answer in line :
>
> On 25 January 2016 at 11:02, Rahul Ramesh wrote:
>
> > We are facing so
ls about Solr heap parameters. Running Solr
> on the edge of OOM is always risk of starting snowball effect and crashing
> entire cluster. Also can you give us info about auto commit (both hard and
> soft) you used when experienced OOM.
>
> Thanks,
> Emir
>
> On 25.01.2016
e such tool that can give you info how
> you Solr, JVM and host handle different load. One such tool can give you
> enough info to tune your Solr.
>
> Regards,
> Emir
>
>
> On 25.01.2016 13:42, Rahul Ramesh wrote:
>
>> Can you give us bit more details about Solr heap
Hi Debraj,
I dont think increasing the timeout will help. Are you sure solr/ any other
program is not running on 8789? Please check the output of lsof -i :8789 .
Regards,
Rahul
On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 11:58 PM, Debraj Manna
wrote:
> Can someone help me on this?
> On Dec 7, 2015 7:55 PM, "D" wro
We currently moved data from magnetic drive to SSD. We run Solr in cloud
mode. Only data is stored in the drive configuration is stored in ZK. We
start solr using the -s option specifying the data dir
Command to start solr
./bin/solr start -c -h -p -z -s
We followed the following steps to migr
You should actually decrease solr heap size. Let me explain a bit.
Solr requires very less heap memory for its operation and more memory for
storing data in main memory. This is because solr uses mmap for storing the
index files.
Please check the link
http://blog.thetaphi.de/2012/07/use-lucenes-mm
ll other children* (1234-platform-ios and
1234-platform-andriod) even if i query based on image_uri_s (1234-images)
although they are other children which are part of the parent document.
Is it possible ?
Appreciate your help !
Thanks,
Ramesh
Yes you are right.
So the query you are saying should be like below .. or did I misunderstood
it
http://localhost:8983/solr/demo/select?q= {!parent
which='type:parent'}&fl=*,[child parentFilter=type:parent
childFilter=(image_uri_s:somevalue) OR (-image_uri_s:*)]&indent=true
If so, I am getting a
Mikhail -
This worked great.
http://localhost:8983/solr/demo/select?q={!parent
which='type:parent'}image_uri_s:somevalue&fl=*,[child
parentFilter=type:parent
childFilter=-type:parent]&indent=true
Thank you.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Querying-Nes
Hi,
Any idea of Solr 6.1.X Release Date ??
I am interested in the [subquery] transformer and like to know the release
date since its available only in 6.1.x
Thanks & Regards
Ramesh
Hi,
I found it working in [subquery] transformer solr-6.1.0-79 nightly builds.
Regards
Ramesh
On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 11:08 AM, Ramesh Shankar wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Any idea of Solr 6.1.X Release Date ??
>
> I am interested in the [subquery] transformer and like to know the release
&
Hi,
Yes, i used the solr-6.1.0-79 nightly builds and [subquery] transformer is
working fine in, any idea of the expected release date for 6.1 ?
Regards
Ramesh
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-6-1-x-Release-Date-tp4280945p4282562.html
Sent from the Solr
display in the next line in the
results.
Can anyone please help on this. Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Ramesh p.y
--
Ramesh P.Y
pyrames...@gmail.com
Mobile No:+91-9176361984
Hi everyone,
We ran into an issue yesterday where all our ec2 machines, running solr,
ran out of memory and could not heal themselves. I'll try break down what
happened here.
*System Architecture:*
- Solr Version: 7.3.1
- Replica Types: TLOG/PULL
- Num Shards: 8 (default hashing mechanism)
- Doc
modern standards.
>
> So it's very likely (but not guaranteed) that using cursors will fix
> this problem.
>
> Best,
> Erick
>
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 20, 2018 at 8:55 PM, Ash Ramesh wrote:
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > We ran into an issue yesterday where
Thank you all :) We have made the necessary changes to mitigate this issue
On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 6:01 AM Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 8/20/2018 9:55 PM, Ash Ramesh wrote:
> > We ran a bunch of deep paginated queries (offset of 1,000,000) with a
> > filter query. We set the timeo
Hi again,
Specs: 7.3.1 | 8 Shards | Solr Cloud
I was wondering how the timeAllowed parameter works when you architect your
cluster in a sharded and distributed manner. This is the curl command and
the timing
Query:
http://localhost:9983/solr/media/select?fq=someField:someRedactedValue&q=*:*&qq=*
, 2018 at 4:09 PM Ash Ramesh wrote:
>
> > Hi again,
> >
> > Specs: 7.3.1 | 8 Shards | Solr Cloud
> >
> > I was wondering how the timeAllowed parameter works when you architect
> your
> > cluster in a sharded and distributed manner. This is the curl command a
Hi again,
We are currently using Solr 7.3.1 and have a 8 shard collection. All our
TLOGs are in seperate machines & PULLs in others. Since not all shards are
in the same machine, the request will be distributed. However, we are
seeing that most of the 'distributed' parts of the requests are being
Hi,
I tried setting up a bespoke ShardHandlerFactory configuration for each
request handler in solrconfig.xml. However when I stepped through the code
in debug mode (via IntelliJ) I could see that the ShardHandler created and
used in the searcher still didn't reflect the values in solrconfig (even
Hi everyone,
My company currently uses SOLR to completely hydrate client objects by
storing all fields (stored=true). Therefore we have 2 types of fields:
1. indexed=true | stored=true : For fields that will be used for
searching, sorting, etc.
2. indexed=false | stored=true: For fields
On Mon, Nov 5, 2018 at 11:29 AM Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 11/3/2018 9:45 PM, Ash Ramesh wrote:
> > My company currently uses SOLR to completely hydrate client objects by
> > storing all fields (stored=true). Therefore we have 2 types of fields:
> >
> > 1. index
Also thanks for the information Shawn! :)
On Mon, Nov 5, 2018 at 12:09 PM Ash Ramesh wrote:
> Sorry Shawn,
>
> I seem to have gotten my wording wrong. I meant that we wanted to move
> away from atomic-updates to replacing/reindexing the document entirely
> again when changes ar
Hi everybody,
My team run a solr cluster which has very low QPS throughput. I have been
going through the different configurations in our setup, and think that
it's probably the way we have defined our request handlers that is causing
the slowness.
Details of our cluster are below the fold.
*Que
Hi everybody,
We have a corpus of 50+ million documents in our collection. I've noticed
that some queries with specific keywords tend to be extremely slow. E.g.
the q=`photography' or q='background'. After digging into the raw
documents, I could see that these two terms appear in greater than 90%
aphy' or 'background'
to appear commonly in a document's keyword list. it seems unlikely we can
use the common grams solution with our business case.
Regards,
Ash
On Mon, Apr 8, 2019 at 5:01 PM Toke Eskildsen wrote:
> On Mon, 2019-04-08 at 09:58 +1000, Ash Ramesh wrote:
&g
Yes, we are running Solr 5.3.1 version in tomcat for our production system.it
serves well.
Thanks,
Ramesh
> On Feb 15, 2018, at 10:54 PM, GVK Prasad wrote:
>
>
> I read some posts on setting up Solr to Run on Tomcat. But all these posts
> are about Solr version 4.0 or e
Hi everybody,
I have a quick question about what the memory requirements for TLOG
machines are on 7.3.1. We currently run replication where there are 3 TLOGs
with 8gb ram (2gb heap) and N PULL replicas with 32gb ram (4gb heap). We
have > 10M documents (1 collection) with the index size being ~ 17g
rick
>
> On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 7:46 AM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> > On 7/18/2018 12:04 AM, Ash Ramesh wrote:
> >>
> >> I have a quick question about what the memory requirements for TLOG
> >> machines are on 7.3.1. We currently run replication where the
Hi,
We are in the process of applying a scoring model to our search results. In
particular, we would like to add scores for documents per query and user
context.
For example, we want to have a score from 500 to 1 for the top 500
documents for the query “dog” for users who speak US English.
We be
ping on this :)
On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 11:50 AM Ashwin Ramesh wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We are in the process of applying a scoring model to our search results.
> In particular, we would like to add scores for documents per query and user
> context.
>
> For example, we want to hav
solution. If you would describe the business
> case in more detail without including the solution itself more people could
> help.
>
> Eg it ie not clear why you have a scoring model and why this can address
> business needs.
>
> > Am 18.02.2020 um 01:50 schrieb Ashwin Ramesh
Hi everybody,
Quick Specs:
- Solr 7.4 Solr Cloud
- 30gb index on 8 shards Tlog/Pull
We run daily backups on our 30gb index and noticed that the overseer does
not process other jobs on it's task list while the backup is being taken.
They remain on the pending list (in ZK). Is this expected?
Also
being flushed to segments though.
Regards,
Ash
On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 3:18 AM Aroop Ganguly
wrote:
> May we know how you are invoking backups ?
>
> > On Mar 9, 2020, at 11:53 PM, Ashwin Ramesh
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi everybody,
> >
> > Quick Specs:
> >
h
On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 9:21 AM Aroop Ganguly
wrote:
> Backups on hdfs ?
> These should not be blocking if invoked asynchronously, are u doing them
> async by passing the async flag?
>
> > On Mar 10, 2020, at 3:19 PM, Ashwin Ramesh
> wrote:
> >
> > We use the
Hi everybody,
Do we need to have 'indexed=true' to be able to retrieve the value of a
field via FieldValueFeature or is having docValue=true enough?
Currently, we have some dynamic fields as [dynamicField=true, stored=false,
indexed=false, docValue=true]. However when we noticing that the value
e
Hi everybody,
We are running a query with both elevateIds=1,2,3 & a reranker phase using
LTR plugin.
We noticed that the results do not return in the expected order - per the
elevateIds param.
Example LTR rq param {!ltr.model=foo reRankDocs=250 efi.query=$q}
When I used the standard reranker ({!
Hi everybody,
We are using solr 7.6 (SolrCloud). We notices that when the backup is
running, we cannot add any replicas to the collection. By the looks of it,
the job to add the replica is put into the Overseer queue, but it is not
being processed. Is this expected? And are there any workarounds?
I would love an answer to this too!
On Fri, Aug 7, 2020 at 12:18 AM Bram Van Dam wrote:
> Hey folks,
>
> Been reading up about the various ways of creating backups. The whole
> "shared filesystem for Solrcloud backups"-thing is kind of a no-go in
> our environment, so I've been looking for ways
e first place and have
> autoAddReplicas=true for indemnity?
>
> > On Aug 10, 2020, at 6:32 PM, Ashwin Ramesh
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi everybody,
> >
> > We are using solr 7.6 (SolrCloud). We notices that when the backup is
> > running, we cannot add any re
next task in the
> queue.
>
> It would also help to ensure your overseer is on a node with a role that
> exempts it from any Solr index responsibilities.
>
>
> > On Aug 10, 2020, at 6:43 PM, Ashwin Ramesh
> wrote:
> >
> > Hey Aroop, the general process for ou
witch to an ebs
> disk for backups on a different project because efs couldn't keep up.
>
> > On Aug 10, 2020, at 9:43 PM, Ashwin Ramesh
> wrote:
> >
> > Hey Aroop, the general process for our backup is:
> > - Connect all machines to an EFS drive (AWS
Hello everybody,
Hoping to get advice on a specific issue - We have a collection of 50M
documents. We recently added a featuredAt field defined as such -
This field is sparely populated such that only a small subset (3-5 thousand
currently) have been tagged with that field.
We have a business
only difference. I am testing the raw URL call timing
difference with and without the extra sort.
Hope this helps,
Regards,
Ash
On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 11:17 PM Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 5/20/2019 6:25 AM, Ashwin Ramesh wrote:
> > Hoping to get advice on a specific issue - We have a coll
Hi everybody,
I can't find concrete evidence whether docValues are indeed useful for
filter queries. One example of a field:
This field will have a value between 0-1 The only usecase for this
field is to filter on a range / subset of values. There will be no scoring
/ querying on this field
Hi everybody,
I was wondering if there is a way we can tell solr (7.3+) to run none of
it's scoring logic. We would like to simply add a set of filter queries and
order on a specific docValue field.
e.g. "Give me all fq=color:red documents ORDER on popularityScore DESC"
Thanks in advance,
Ash
o these are just assumptions.
>
> Emir
> --
> Monitoring - Log Management - Alerting - Anomaly Detection
> Solr & Elasticsearch Consulting Support Training - http://sematext.com/
>
>
>
> > On 12 Sep 2019, at 01:27, Ashwin Ramesh wrote:
> >
> > Hi everybody,
>
Ah! Thanks so much!
On Thu., 12 Sep. 2019, 11:56 pm Shawn Heisey, wrote:
> On 9/12/2019 12:43 AM, Ashwin Ramesh wrote:
> > I just tried a * query with filters with fl=id,score. I noticed that all
> > scores were 1.0. Which I assume means no scoring was done. When I added a
>
Hi everybody,
We have a usecase where we want to push a popularity boost for each
document in our collection. When a user searches for any term, we would
like to arbitrarily add an additional boost by this value (which is
different for each document).
E.g. q=foo&boost=def(popularityBoostField,1)
Hi everybody,
I am using the edismax parser and have noticed a very specific behaviour
with how sow=true (default) handles multiword keywords.
We have a field called 'keywords', which uses the general
KeywordTokenizerFactory. There are also other text fields like title and
description. etc.
When
d adding
> it explicitly? As keyword:”ice cream”
>
> Best,
> Erick
>
> > On Sep 30, 2019, at 5:27 AM, Ashwin Ramesh wrote:
> >
> > Hi everybody,
> >
> > I am using the edismax parser and have noticed a very specific behaviour
> > with how sow=tr
Hi everyone,
We had an OOM event earlier this morning. This has caused one of our shards
to lose all it's replicas and it's leader is still in a down state. We have
restarted the Java process (solr) and it's still in a down state. Logs
below:
```
Feb 25, 2021 @ 11:46:43.000 2021-02-25 00:46:43.26
Regards,
Ramesh babu Murari
The information contained in this message is intended only for the recipient,
and may be a confidential attorney-client communication or may otherwise be
privileged and confidential and protected from disclosure. If the reader
document, but thats not
used in the sort. And i have verified in both the solr versions 3.1 and
3.5. same error.
Can some one help me out..
Cheers
Ramesh vel
That is the default response format. If you would like to change that, you
could extend the search handler or post process the XML data. Another option
would be to use the javabin (if your app is java based) and build xml the way
your app would need.
Best Regards,
Ramesh
>
I have seen similar errors before when the solr version and solrj version in
the client don't match.
Best Regards,
Ramesh
66 matches
Mail list logo