rent query volumes on rotating disk without spending a great
deal of money. The old newspaper index is running on a SAN with 24
fast disks backing it, and we can't support the same query rate on it
as we can with the other newspaper index on SSDs (even before the
shingling change).
Kent Fitch
Trove development team
National Library of Australia
n((x+5)/38)*42+105
http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=plot++sin%28%28x%2B5%29%2F38%29*42%2B105%2C+x%3D50..175
Regards,
Kent Fitch
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 12:29 PM, Mark wrote:
> I need some help with one of my boost functions. I would like the
> function to look something like the foll
trick,
such as
110 - 50((x-100)/20)/(sqrt(1+((x-100)/20)^2))
http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=plot+110+-+50%28%28x-100%29%2F20%29%2F%28sqrt%281%2B%28%28x-100%29%2F20%29
^2%29%29%2C+x%3D0..200
Regards
Kent Fitch
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 6:17 AM, Walter Underwood wrote:
> In practice, I expect
Hi John,
sounds like this bug in NIO:
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/JETTY-937
http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6403933
I think recent versions of jetty work around this bug, or maybe try
the non-NIO socket connector
Kent
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 9:10 AM, John Russell wrote:
SolrIndexSearcher (and organise somehow for
SolrIndexSearcher to use that sublass)
Or perhaps Im taking the wrong approach to this problem entirely! Any
advice is greatly appreciated.
Kent Fitch
ilters one by one in our own query
component on a scored document list retrieved by SolrIndexSearcher -
Im not sure - maybe I havent understood SOLR-1165?
Thanks also Walter for your suggestions. Our users have a requirement
for the index to be continuously updated (well, every 10 minutes or
so), and our queries are extremely diverse/"long tail"ish, so an HTTP
cache will probably not help us.
Kent Fitch
to 134 seconds on reloads after index updates. About
60-70 secs is still spend in GC, but it is a significant improvement.
Unless you have very large numbers of facet values, this change won't
have any positive benefit.
Regards,
Kent Fitch
t version of 1.4 very soon.
> And don't forget to update http://wiki.apache.org/solr/PublicServers
> when you go live!
We will - thanks for your great work in improving SOLR performance
with 1.4 which makes such outrageous uses of facets even thinkable.
Regards,
Kent Fitch
they can "mask" facets
from the most relevant results - the authors, years and subjects we
have full text for are not representative of the whole corpus)
- if a searcher pages through to the 1000th result page, down to these
less relevant results, should we somehow include these resul
