Solr GeoHash Field (Solr 4.5)

2014-05-29 Thread Chris Atkinson
Hi, I've been reading up a lot on what David has written about GeoHash fields and would like to use them. I'm trying to create a nice way to display cluster counts of geo points on a google map. It's naturally not going to be possible to send 40k marker information over the wire to cluster... so

Re: Geo spatial clustering of points

2013-08-21 Thread Chris Atkinson
Did you get any resolution for this? I'm about to implement something identical. On 3 Jul 2013 23:03, "Jeroen Steggink" wrote: > Hi, > > I'm looking for a way to clustering (or should I call it group) geo > spatial points on map based on the current zoom level and get the median > coordinate for

SpatialRecursivePrefixTreeFieldType Spatial Searching

2013-06-03 Thread Chris Atkinson
Hi, I'm seeing really slow query times. 7-25 seconds when I run a simple filter query that uses my SpatialRecursivePrefixTreeFieldType field. My index is about 30k documents. Prior to adding the Spatial field, the on disk space was about 100Mb, so it's a really tiny index. Once I add the spatial f

Re: SpatialRecursivePrefixTreeFieldType Spatial Searching

2013-06-03 Thread Chris Atkinson
quot; +MatchAllDocsQuery(*:*) -ConstantScore(org.apache.lucene.spatial.prefix.IntersectsPrefixTreeFilter@42ce603b ) 8171.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 8170.0 8170.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 12:27 PM, Chris Atkinson wrote: > Hi, > I'm seeing really slow query times. 7-2

Re: SpatialRecursivePrefixTreeFieldType Spatial Searching

2013-06-04 Thread Chris Atkinson
in it's not a problem) use > 0.3 -- a little less. Please report back how that goes. > > ~ David > > On 6/3/13 7:27 AM, "Chris Atkinson" wrote: > > >Hi, > >I'm seeing really slow query times. 7-25 seconds when I run a simple > >filter > &

Re: SpatialRecursivePrefixTreeFieldType Spatial Searching

2013-06-04 Thread Chris Atkinson
bility_spatial:"Intersects( 30 0 3650 115 )" < arr name="availability_spatial"> 147.6 163.4 164.6 178.4 192.6 220.4 241.6 264.4 On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 8:14 PM, Chris Atkinson wrote: > Thanks David. > Query times are really quick and my index is only 20Mb now whic

Re: SpatialRecursivePrefixTreeFieldType Spatial Searching

2013-06-04 Thread Chris Atkinson
:"Intersects( 0 30.5 114.5 3650 )" > > Does that work against your data? If it doesn't, can you conjecture why > it doesn't work based on a sample point in a document that it matched, or > a document that should have matched but didn't? > > ~ David > >

Re: SpatialRecursivePrefixTreeFieldType Spatial Searching

2013-06-05 Thread Chris Atkinson
apes. > > Speaking of that slight buffer to the query shape I said in my last email, > it should be < half of maxDistErr, whatever you set that to. So use like > 0.1. > > ~ David > > > Chris Atkinson wrote > > Hi David, > > Thanks for your continued help. >