Hello again Arturas.
I meant to reply before but somehow lost track of it ... The "Lifecycle of a
Solr Search Request" slides [1] and/or talk [2] may be of interest to you.
Regards,
Christine
[1] https://home.apache.org/~hossman/rev2017/
[2] https://youtu.be/qItRilJLj5o
From: solr-user@lucene.
Hi Christine,
Thanks a lot for the posts. Very impressive information (article as well as
the youtube video!)
Thanks a lot Merry Xmas and and Happy New Year!
Cheers,
Arturas
On Thu, Dec 24, 2020 at 11:03 AM Christine Poerschke (BLOOMBERG/ LONDON) <
cpoersc...@bloomberg.net> wrote:
> Hello agai
Hello,
I have the the same field type defined in Solr 4.6 and Solr 7.5. When I
search with both versions, I get different results, and I don't know why
I have the following *field type definition in Solr 4.6*:
Hi,
Try adding debug=true or debug=query in the url and see the formed query at
the end .
You will get to know why the results are different.
On Thu, 24 Dec, 2020, 8:05 pm nettadalet, wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have the the same field type defined in Solr 4.6 and Solr 7.5. When I
> search with both
Hello all,
I have a plong field in my schema representing a Unix timestamp
I’m doing a range facet over this field to find which event occured on which
day. I’m setting “start” on some date at 00:00 o’clock, end on another, and
setting gap to 86400 (total seconds in a day)
...
"type": "range"
Then you need to form your start at relative to your timezone.
What I’d actually recommend is that if you need to bucket by day,
you index the day in a separate field. Of course, if you have to
bucket by day in arbitrary timezones that won’t work…..
Best,
Erick
> On Dec 24, 2020, at 4:42 PM, ufu
