Hi Anil,
Your search URL suggest/?q="michael ja" and fieldType (without
PatternReplaceFilterFactory) is correct.
However looking in to your response carefully I see that you have numFound="0"
no results.
And results you point come form "suggest" (probably suggester component). But
in this app
Any word on this?
I inspected the solrj code an found nothing. It's a shame if the GA version
comes out without such an api.
Thanks again,
Yoni
-Original Message-
From: Yoni Amir [mailto:yoni.a...@actimize.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2012 8:48 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subje
Ssd does not always improve performance of Solr. We tried several SSD and we
saw an improvement of only a few percentages in query qtime, etc...
It is definitely not always a slam dunk
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/recommended-SSD-tp4002975p4004898.htm
Ssd does not always improve performance of Solr. We tried several SSD and we
saw an improvement of only a few percentages in query qtime, etc...
It is definitely not always a slam dunk
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/recommended-SSD-tp4002975p4004899.htm
You polling interval is much too short. 1 second
is probably getting you into resource contention
issues.
A more reasonable interval is on the order of several
minutes. If you really need near real time
searching, consider 4.0 which supports NRT
Best
Erick
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 10:02 AM, Damie
if we pre assigning the cache values in the solrconfig.xml as follows for
each core [solr 1.3] .IS the RAM memory pre assigned as follows per core
and how much would be used for each .Would I be able to calculate the RAM
reserved for each cache.since we have many such cores with the same Cache
val
