One doubt regarding adding the solr plugin.
I have a new java file created that includes few changes in
SynonymFilterFactory.java. I want this java file to be added to solr
instance.
I created a package as : org.apache.pco.search
This includes OrcSynonymFilterFactory java class extends
I am trying to do a simple mapping of a 2 word term to a 1 word term and
it does not work. See my configuration at the bottom of the email. My
scenario is that I have a term called "pond care" and I want to map it
to the term "fountain". So whenever a user enters the term "pond care"
in the search
Hi,
did you have a look at the query()-function mentioned in the Wiki?
It sounds like something you should give a try!
Regards,
Em
Bill Bell wrote:
>
> I know that the _val_ is the only thing influencing the score.
>
> The fq is just to limit also by those queries.
>
> What I am asking is if
Were you able to get it work .. if yes how ?
I'm having almost the same problem.
I used the " fieldType name="alphaOnlySort" class="solr.TextField" as in
the sample schema.xml , to define a field named "alphaname".
Then copied from one of the fields name "foodDescUS" to "alphaname".
When i
{{{A custom indexer, so that's a fairly common practice? So when you are
dealing with these large indexes, do you try not to fully rebuild them
when you can? It's not a nightly thing, but something to do in case of
a disaster? Is there a difference in the performance of an index that
was built all
First I appreciate your writeup of the problem, it's very helpful when people
take the time to put in the details
I can't reconcile these two things:
{{{
as org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: Error loading class
'pointcross.orchSynonymFilterFactory' at}}}
This seems to indicate that your
On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 12:26 AM, Bill Bell wrote:
> I know that the _val_ is the only thing influencing the score.
What creates the score is the main query.
There are tons of ways to build up that main query in different ways.
So the answer to your question is "yes", you can influence the score
Let's see the query you submit. This looks like a typo or an
improperly specified field name
":foodDesc"
Best
Erick
On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 8:18 AM, Pratik wrote:
> Were you able to get it work .. if yes how ?
> I'm having almost the same problem.
>
> I used the " fieldType name="alphaOnlyS
Nobody?
Am I the only one in need of upgrading an index that was created with 1.4.1?
Thanks for any info
Ofer
On Friday, April 22, 2011, Ofer Fort wrote:
> Hi all,
> While doing some tests, I realized that an index that was created with
> solr 1.4.1 is readable by solr 3.1, but nt readable by so
Hi,
Maybe you are doing query-time synonym expansion?
Try changing that to do index-time synonym expansion.
See
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/AnalyzersTokenizersTokenFilters#solr.SynonymFilterFactory
Otis
Sematext :: http://sematext.com/ :: Solr - Lucene - Nutch
Lucene ecosystem search :: h
Hi,
You didn't say much about how your backend is configured, so it's hard to tell,
but I imagine you could have multiple fields based on the same original data
and
one of those fields could be highly boosted (via dismax/edismax) field for
exact
matches.
Otis
Sematext :: http://sematex
Bryan,
Have a look at page 111 of Lucene in Action 2, section 4.1. Is that the sort
of
thing you are after?
If so, we may have some code that produced that in the LIA2 source code
download...
You could also just write a small app/script that calls (via HTTP/SolrJ) one of
the Solr analysis re
Rahul,
Here's a suggestion:
Write a simple app that uses *Lucene* to create N indices, one for each of the
documents you want to test. Then you can look at their sizes on disk.
Not sure if it's super valuable to see sizes of individual documents, but you
can do it as described above.
Of course
Charles,
Grab Solr nightly build and try that. Should be much faster.
n.b. you don't need 10 in your
config
any more. (although this looks like a config from your master, not slave, if
you
are using that sort of setup)
Otis
Sematext :: http://sematext.com/ :: Solr - Lucene - Nu
thanks for all your inputs.
On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 8:36 PM, Otis Gospodnetic-2 [via Lucene] <
ml-node+2851624-1936255218-340...@n3.nabble.com> wrote:
> Rahul,
>
> Here's a suggestion:
> Write a simple app that uses *Lucene* to create N indices, one for each of
> the
> documents you want to tes
Thanks Tom!
I think I've seen a good explanation of tie from Hoss once something that
described the background for tie beyond "it's good for breaking score ties
between two documents". For example, what are the scenarios where one can
expect or fear scoring ties between multiple documents
Hi Ofer,
We recently helped a customer go through just such an upgrade (or maybe even
from 1.3.*). We used a tool that read data from one index and indexed it to
the
new index without having to reindex the data from the original sources. All
fields in the source index were obviously stored.
Does anybody has other suggestions?
thanks & regards,
Rajesh Ramana
Enterprise Applications, Turner Broadcasting System, Inc.
404.878.7474
-Original Message-
From: Ramanathapuram, Rajesh [mailto:rajesh.ramanathapu...@turner.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2011 2:51 PM
To: solr-user@lu
Hi Renee,
Here's what I'd do:
* Check how many open files your system is set up for (ulimit -n). You likely
want to increase that (1024 seems to be a common default under Linux, and in
the
past I've set that to 30k+ without issues)
* Look at your mergeFactor. If it's high, consider lowering i
As someone who's new to Solr/Lucene, I'm having trouble finding
information on sorting results in localized alphabetical order. I've
ineffectively searched the wiki and the mail archives.
I'm thinking for example about Hawai'ian, where mīka (with an i-macron)
comes after mika (i without the ma
please see http://wiki.apache.org/solr/UnicodeCollation
In general the idea is similar to how this is handled in databases,
you can index collation keys into a sort field at analysis time, then
you just do a standard solr sort.
However, I am not sure if your JRE provides a "haw" Locale for the
Ha
On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 12:33 PM, Ben Preece wrote:
> As someone who's new to Solr/Lucene, I'm having trouble finding information
> on sorting results in localized alphabetical order. I've ineffectively
> searched the wiki and the mail archives.
>
> I'm thinking for example about Hawai'ian, where
Thanks Otis, but this is not my case. Most of my fields are not stored
, but I do have the original data in case I need to reindex.
My question is do I need to?
If my 1.4.1 can be read by 3.1, I assume 3.1 can continue to write to it?
In that case, I continue assuming that 4.0 will know how to read
Hello,
First post here... I spent some time researching this but can't seem
to find the answer I am looking for...
I have a MySQL DB that I have Solr indexing and all is well.
However, one field I need to index is a text field that contains XML
stored in the DB. I read up on DIH Transformers a b
Thank you. This looks like the right direction.
I see the docs say ICUCollationKeyFilterFactory is deprecated in favor of
ICUCollationField. So ... I'd implement a subclass of ICUCollationField,
and use that as the fieldtype in schema.xml. And this means - what? - that
I'd also implement a cust
In case you need to create lots of indexes and register/unregister fast,
there is work on the way http://wiki.apache.org/solr/LotsOfCores
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Need-to-create-dyanamic-indexies-base-on-different-document-workspaces-tp2845919p2852410.ht
On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 2:37 PM, Bently Preece wrote:
> Thank you. This looks like the right direction.
>
> I see the docs say ICUCollationKeyFilterFactory is deprecated in favor of
> ICUCollationField. So ... I'd implement a subclass of ICUCollationField,
> and use that as the fieldtype in sche
What if there is no standard localization already? The case I'm
specifically interested in is Ojibwe.
So should I really be researching how the JRE does localization instead of
Solr?
On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 2:01 PM, Robert Muir wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 2:37 PM, Bently Preece wrote:
>
Hello list,
there is a problem with the SVN-Checkout of the current Solr-version, I
think.
I can run ant eclipse, it does not show any errors (needed 20 seconds the
first time and 0.9 seconds afterwards).
However, the classpath-files were not set properly. A click on refresh did
not show the expe
I have to correct myself.
I just tried to copy the files manually to the correct destinations. It
showed that those files already are there (however, they did not show up in
the terminal).
What else could be responsible for the fact that the click on refresh does
not show a developer-like view?
On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 3:09 PM, Bently Preece wrote:
> What if there is no standard localization already? The case I'm
> specifically interested in is Ojibwe.
>
this is standard? to sort a field with a specific locale, you have to
tell it the locale you want. if you use the ICU implementation y
Regardless of what anyone here says, you need to try it.
3.1 should be able to read 1.4.1, yes.
One the format is switched to 3.1, you can't go back and read it with 1.4.1.
This is why you want to upgrade your Slaves first, then your Master (if you
have
them -- I remember we spoke a while back
Thanks, I'll do the procedure on my test env and update the community,
if anybody already went through the process, I would lov to here about it
On Friday, April 22, 2011, Otis Gospodnetic wrote:
> Regardless of what anyone here says, you need to try it.
> 3.1 should be able to read 1.4.1, yes.
Thanks. I get it now.
I meet with our language experts again on Monday. I'll ask them about
submitting localization info to the CLDR.
Thanks again.
-Ben
On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 2:44 PM, Robert Muir wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 3:09 PM, Bently Preece wrote:
> > What if there is no stand
I can repeatedly demonstrate this in my dev environment, where I get
entirely different results searching for AppleTV vs. appletv and I
really just don't get it. I set up a specific sku in dev with AppleTV
in its title to experiment with. What can I provide to help diagnose?
I need to make this w
How are your hl.fl fields defined in schema.xml?
Koji
--
http://www.rondhuit.com/en/
(11/04/23 1:23), Ramanathapuram, Rajesh wrote:
Does anybody has other suggestions?
thanks& regards,
Rajesh Ramana
Enterprise Applications, Turner Broadcasting System, Inc.
404.878.7474
-Original Message
On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 8:24 PM, Robert Petersen wrote:
> I can repeatedly demonstrate this in my dev environment, where I get
> entirely different results searching for AppleTV vs. appletv
You originally said "I cannot get a match between AppleTV on the
indexing side and appletv on the search si
I have a MySQL DB that I have Solr indexing and all is well.
However, one field I need to index is a text field that contains XML
stored in the DB. I read up on DIH Transformers a bit and I am
wondering... is there a way to have solr DIH either transform the XML
data or strip the XML out of the
38 matches
Mail list logo
