> Is possible to export one set of documents indexed in one
> solr server for do
> a sincronization with other solr server?
Replication? http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrReplication
> I am getting the below results ,But for the first doc the
> score is higher
> than second doc, Even though the prod_n only has
> "Computers" word.
> I want to push down the first doc to second.H
You can use Jan's magic solution -that uses map function- for that.
http://search-lucene.com/m/nK6t9j
Thank you,It is perfectly working
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/String-field-with-lower-case-filter-tp1930941p1935283.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Even after expanding the synonyms also i am unable to get same results.
Is there any other method to achieve this
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Problem-with-synonyms-tp1905051p1935419.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Make sure you are not going to "reinvent the wheel" here ;). There's been
done a lot around the problem of distributes search engine.
This thread might be useful for you: http://search-hadoop.com/m/ARlbS1MiTNY
Alex Baranau
Sematext :: http://sematext.com/ :: Solr - Lucene - Nutch - Hadoop - H
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 1:16 AM, sivaprasad wrote:
> Query1:hdtv
>
> MultiPhraseQuery(searchtext:"high definit (televis
> tv tvs)")
>
> and the number of results returned is ZERO.
>
> Query2:High Definition Television
>
> The parsed query is given below.
> +searchtext:high +searchtext:definit
> +(
What happens when you use synonym filter at index time only with expand="true"
with this synonym_index.txt?
I use only comma operator:
hdtv, High Definition Television, High Definition TV, High Definition
Televisions, High Definition TVs
Also putting the synonym filter under the stem filter ca
Another question on that configuration, when the "master" commits, how does
the "slave" knows that the index has changed? Does it check the index and
finds out that it has a newer version?
Thanks again for the help,
Ofer
ב-19 בנוב 2010, בשעה 05:30, Lance Norskog כתב/ה:
If they are on the same
The slave polls. See: http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrReplication
Best
Erick
On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 1:13 PM, Ofer Fort wrote:
> Another question on that configuration, when the "master" commits, how does
> the "slave" knows that the index has changed? Does it check the index and
> finds out th
Folks,Am trying to query documents which have no values present, I have used
the following constructs and it doesn't seem to work on the solr dev tip (as of
09/22) or the 1.4 builds.1. (*:* AND -FieldName[* TO *]) - returns no
documents, parsedquery was "+MatchAllDocsQuery(*:*) -FieldName:[* TO
Are you absolutely sure your documents really don't have any values for
"FieldName"? Because your results are perfectly correct if every doc has a
value for "FieldName".
Or are you saying there no such field as "FieldName"?
Best
Erick
On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 3:12 PM, Viswa S wrote:
>
> Folks,A
Yes I do have a couple of documents with no values and one with an empty
string. Find below the output of a facet on the fieldName.
ThanksViswa
1
> Date: Sat, 20 Nov 2010 15:29:06 -0500
> Subject: Re: Empty value/string matching
> From: erickerick...@gmail.com
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.
thanks Erick,
but my question was regard the configuration Lance suggested, a
configuration where i have two servers, set set logical master and slave,
not as a true replication. Since both are running on the same machine, just
have one only doing updates, and the other only queries, but both are u
I don't think that's correct. The documents wouldn't be showing
up in the facets if they had no value for the field. So I think you're
being mislead by the printout from the faceting. Perhaps you
have unprintable characters in there or some such. Certainly the
name:" " is actually a value, admitted
Erick,
Thanks for the quick response. The output i showed is on a test instance i
created to simulate this issue. I intentionally tried to create documents with
no values by creating xml nodes with "", but
having values in the other fields in a document.
Are you saying that there is no way hav
Ah! If the program doing the indexing has manual commits, the program
could send a commit to the slave. If the indexer uses automatic
commits, there is a trick: you can add a program as a postCommit event
in solrconfig.xml. This can just be a shell script or a curl command
that sends a commit to th
If a string field has a value with " ", that has to be searched for.
fieldName:" " should work.
If there is a 0-length value in a string field, that might be found
with fieldName:"" but I have no experience with 0-length values. I
don't know if this adds a value to the field or not:
""
One way to
OK,
so to make sure i understand, even though the "slave" doesn't do any
indexing, i will call commit and it will do nothing to the index itself, but
will reload it?
thanks
On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 8:26 AM, Lance Norskog wrote:
> Ah! If the program doing the indexing has manual commits, the progr
18 matches
Mail list logo
