> I am able to facet on a particular field because I have
> index on that field.
> But I am not sure how to facet on a price range when I have
> the exact price
> in the 'price' field. Can anyone help here.
Something like this:
&facet=on&facet.query=price:[* TO 500]&facet.query=price:[500 TO *]
take a look here
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/33956/how-to-get-facet-ranges-in-solr-results
I am able to facet on a particular field because I have index on that field.
But I am not sure how to facet on a price range when I have the exact price
in the 'price' field. Can anyone help here.
Hmmm... Jason can you enable IndexWriter's infoStream and get the
corruption to happen again and post that (along with "ls -l" output)?
Mike
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 5:11 PM, Jason Rutherglen
wrote:
> I'm still seeing this error after downloading the latest 2.9 branch
> version, compiling, copying
Hi,
when I delete the /data directory and restart the slave, it creates a random
indexversion number, which can be higher than the master indexversion
number. If the newly started slave has a higher number than the master, a
replication is impossible. I want to stresstest the replication, so manua
Stephan, Ephraim. Thanks for the answers!!!
I am finding Solr to be a useful product, but definitely the community
is what makes it a great product!
So far everyone has been very helpful. Thanks!
Cheers!
Juan M.
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 9:13 AM, Ephraim Ofir wrote:
> Also, your deltaImportQuery sh
Hi all,
we're moving from an old lucene version to solr and plan to use the "Copy
Field" functionality. Previously we had "rolled our own" implementation,
sticking title, description, etc. in a field called 'content'.
We lose some flexibility (i.e. java layer can no longer control what gets in
t
Thank you both. Faceting is now working on a range.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/How-to-Facet-on-a-price-range-tp1846392p1848716.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi,
I've got an ordinary master/slave replication set up. The master contains
several fields that are not used by the slaves but are used by processes that
interact with the master. Removing the fields from the master is not an option.
Well, to save disk space i'd figure i create an `ignored` f
It's pretty straight-forward, just make sure your dest field has
multivalued="true"
Do note that the *raw* data is copied, not the analyzed. Conceptually
the copy is done before analysis of the source field (which you probably
already know, but the question has come up on the list from time to
Hi,
I'm trying to understand what Solr is doing when a search for O'Connor and
O'Conn* is done.
The first search returns 4 results, which is fine. I would expect the second
search to return at least 4 (the same) results, however it fails to return
any.
I've debugged the query and this is the ou
One place to start would be the Analysis page http://{your
machine}:{port}/solr/admin/analysis.jsp?highlight=on
There you can see exactly what happens to your query as it being moved down
the Analysis chain.
In my knowledge, no analysis is performed on wildcarded terms so my guess
would be that th
Hi Savvas,
Thanks for the reply. Yep I've been trying out the Analysis tool.
As you say the index does lowercase the terms.
Field Name: surname
Index Value: O'Connor
Query Value: connor
The Index Analyzer creates:
o connor
Which the query value above will match on.
However, if the quer
strange..my second guess would be that stemming could be the reason but if
your analyser(s) emit the same values you use for searching that's odd..
could you post your schema definition for the surname field?
On 5 November 2010 17:33, C0re wrote:
>
> Hi Savvas,
>
> Thanks for the reply. Yep I'v
Note that using many facet.query= parameters may be expensive.
Another way to solve this is to pre-compute the ranges as plain strings in
another field during indexing.
This can be done in your app prior to indexing or by creating a new FieldType
for your range. Here's a field type that computes
How about hooking in Andrzej's pruning tool at the postCommit event, literally
removing unused fields. I believe a "commit" is fired on the slave by itself
after every successful replication, to put the index live. You could execute a
script which prunes away the dead meat and then call a new c
(sorry for cross postings - I think this is important information to
disseminate)
Executive Summary: you probably need to increase your query slop. A
lot.
We recently had a feedback ticket that a title search with a hyphen
wasn't working properly. This is especially curious because we
On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 3:04 PM, Naomi Dushay wrote:
> (sorry for cross postings - I think this is important information to
> disseminate)
>
> Executive Summary: you probably need to increase your query slop. A lot.
>
I looked at your example, and it really looks a lot like
https://issues.apache
Thanks for the pointer!
> How about hooking in Andrzej's pruning tool at the postCommit event,
> literally removing unused fields. I believe a "commit" is fired on the
> slave by itself after every successful replication, to put the index live.
> You could execute a script which prunes away the
> I'm trying to understand what Solr is doing when a search
> for O'Connor and
> O'Conn* is done.
>
> The first search returns 4 results, which is fine. I would
> expect the second
> search to return at least 4 (the same) results, however it
> fails to return
> any.
>
> I've debugged the query an
Hi,
I have 100k URL's in my index. I specifically crawled sits relating to law.
However, during my intitial crawls I didn't specify urlfilters so I am stuck
with extrinsic and often irrelevant URL's like twitter, etc.
Is there some way in Solr that I can run periodic URL cleanings to remov
Robert,
Thanks! I've been using Solr 1.5 from trunk back in March - time to
upgrade! I also like the "put the stopword filter after the WDF
filter" fix.
- Naomi
On Nov 5, 2010, at 12:36 PM, Robert Muir wrote:
On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 3:04 PM, Naomi Dushay
wrote:
(sorry for cross post
> can you enable IndexWriter's infoStream
I'd like to however the problem is only happening in production, and
the indexing volume is in the millions per hour. The log would be
clogged up, as it is I have logging in Tomcat turned off because it is
filling up the SSD drive (yes I know, we should
See TestIndexWriterOnDiskFull (on trunk). Look for the test w/
LUCENE-2743 in the comment... but the other tests there also test
other cases that may hit disk full.
Can you post the exceptions you hit? (Are these logged?).
Yes this could be a hardware issue...
Millions of docs indexed per hour
Hi Varun,
On 10/26/2010 at 11:26 PM, Varun Gupta wrote:
> I will try to implement the two filters suggested by Steven and see how
> the performance matches up.
Have you made any progress?
I was thinking about your use case, and it occurred to me that you could get
what you want by reversing the
Hi,
I built the trunk and deploy the war, but cannot access the admin URL
anymore.
Error loading class
'org.apache.solr.highlight.MultiColoredScoreOrderFragmentsBuilder
This class seems to be missing?
thanks,
Darren
What program do you use to POST?
How do you give parameters to Solr? Are you doing multipart upload?
You might have to add all of your parameters to a custom
requestHandler, like the /dataimport requestHandler.
Post your DIH config file, if you can.
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 5:13 AM, Theodor Tolst
26 matches
Mail list logo