Hello,
I'm wondering if it's possible to index and facet "unknown" fields.
Let's me explain:
I've got a set of 1M products (from computer to freezer), and each category
of product has some attributes, so number of attributes is pretty large
(1000+).
I've started to describe each attribute in m
hi,
> So, can I index and facet these fields, without describe then in my schema?
>
> I will first try with dynamic fields, but I'm not sure it's going to work.
we do all our facet fields in this way, with just general string field
for single/multivalued
fields:
and faceting
Thanks,
I'll test your solution shortly
Mickael.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Faceting-unknown-fields-tp951008p951027.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hello,I've been trying to get rid of a bug when using the spellcheck but so far
with no success :(When searching for a word that starts with a number, for
example "3dsmax", i get the results that i want, BUT the spellcheck says it is
not correctly spelled AND the collation gives me "33dsmax". F
Hi everyone,
I have a requirement to achieve, but i can't figure out how to do it. Hope
someone could help me.
Here is the requirement: A book has several keyphrases (available to use in
searching). The author could buy the search result position with these
keyphrases or simply add keyphrases rel
Is there any tools for "Distributed Indexing"? It refers to
KattaIntegration and ZooKeeperIntegration in
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/DistributedSearch.
But it seems that they concern more on error processing and
replication. I need a dispatcher that dispatch different docs by
uniqueKey(suc
if you want only documents that have both values then make your q
q=content:videos+AND+content:songs
If you want the more open query, but to be able to tell which docs have
videos, which have songs and which have both...then I'm not sure. Using
debugQuery=on might help with your understanding,
Sounds like you want Payloads. I don't think you can guarantee a position,
but you can boost relative to others. You can give one author/book a boost
of 0 for the phrase Cooking, and another author/book a boost of .5 and yet
another a boost of 1.0. For searches that include the phrase Cooking, the
Hi,
Is it possible to remove from search results the multivalued fields that
don't pass the search criteria?
My schema is defined as:
And example docs are:
++--+++
| id | name | town | date |
++
Hi solr users
I need to know how solr manages the connections when we make a request(select
update commit)
Is there any connection pooling or an article to learn about it connection
management??
How can I log in a file the connections solr server
I have setup my solr 1.4 with tomcat
Thanks i
Hi,
Solr runs as a Web application. The requests you most probably mean
are just HTTP-requests to the underlying container. Internally each
request is processed against the Lucene index, usually being a file-
based one. Therefore there are no connections like in a database
application, where you
Jorl, ok tendré que modificar mi petición de vacaciones :(
Rubén Abad
On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 2:46 PM, ZAROGKIKAS,GIORGOS <
g.zarogki...@multirama.gr> wrote:
> Hi solr users
>
> I need to know how solr manages the connections when we make a
> request(select update commit)
> Is there any conn
Yes I mean HTTP-requests
How can I log them?
-Original Message-
From: Sven Maurmann [mailto:sven.maurm...@kippdata.de]
Sent: Thursday, July 08, 2010 3:56 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: solr connection question
Hi,
Solr runs as a Web application. The requests you most p
ok please don't forget it :)
2010/7/8 Ruben Abad
> Jorl, ok tendré que modificar mi petición de vacaciones :(
> Rubén Abad
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 2:46 PM, ZAROGKIKAS,GIORGOS <
> g.zarogki...@multirama.gr> wrote:
>
> > Hi solr users
> >
> > I need to know how solr manages the connectio
Li,
as far as I know, you still have to do this part yourself.
A possible way to shard is to number the shards from 0 to numShards-1,
calculate hash(uniqueKey)%numShards per each document,
and send the document to the resulting shard number.
This number is consistent and sends documents uniformly
Hi,
I'm trying to find out which tokens in a user's query matched against each
result. I've been trying to use the highlight component for this, however it
doesn't quite fit the bill.
I'm using edismax, with mm set to 50%, and I want to extract for each
matching doc which tokens /didn't/ match (I
Hi,
Currently we are trying to acheive both realtime and batch indexing using
SOLR.
For batch indexing we have setup a master SOLR server which uses DIH and
indexes the data.
For slave we post the XML (real time) in to the SOLR slave and add that to
the existing SOLR document.
Now my issue is
Hi,
We are trying to import data from the ORACLE database into Solr 1.4
for free text search and would like to provide a faceted search
experience. There are files on the network which we are indexing as
well.
We are using the DIH for indexing the data from the database and have
writte
To clarify, I never want a snippet, I always want a whole line returned. Is
this possible? Thanks!
-Pete
On Jul 7, 2010, at 5:33 PM, Peter Spam wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a text file broken apart by carriage returns, and I'd like to only
> return entire lines. So, I'm trying to use this:
>
I'm still having issues - my config looks like:
However I really dont want to use CreationDate, but rather just pass in the
id (as done in the deltaImportQuery) - Can I do that directly - if so how do
I specify the value for dataimporter.delta.id?
(P.S. sorry for a new thread, I kep
(10/07/09 2:44), Peter Spam wrote:
To clarify, I never want a snippet, I always want a whole line returned. Is
this possible? Thanks!
-Pete
Hello Pete,
Use NullFragmenter. It can be used via GapFragmenter with
hl.fragsize=0.
Koji
--
http://www.rondhuit.com/en/
Since I began using the 2010-05-18 nightly I'm experiencing indexing slow
downs which I didn't with solr-1.4.
I'm seeing indexing slow down roughly every 7m records. I'm indexing about
28m in total. These records are batched into csv files of 1m rows, which are
loaded with stream.file. Solr happil
Thanks for the note, Koji. However, hl.fragsize=0 seems to return the entire
document, rather than just one single line.
Here's what I tried (what I previously had was commented out):
regexv = "^.*$"
thequery =
'/solr/select?facet=true&facet.limit=10&fl=id,score,filename&tv=true&timeAllowed=30
On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 7:44 PM, Mark Holland wrote:
>
> Can anyone suggest where I might start looking for answers? I have a
> yourkit
> snapshot if anyone would care to see it.
>
>
Doesn't sound good. I'd like to see whatever data you can provide (i worry
it might be something in analysis)
--
There is no batch job scheduling in Solr. You will have to script this
with your OS tools (probably the 'cron' program).
Tika is integrated into the DataImportHandler in Solr 1.5. This gives
you flexibility in indexing and is worth extra effort.
On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 10:48 AM, Sanjeev Kakar wro
You cannot add to the same index on two different solrs. You can set
up separate shards for the batch and incremental indexes and use
distributed search to query both of them.
On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 10:04 AM, bbarani wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Currently we are trying to acheive both realtime and batch in
Yes, denormalizing the index into separate (name,town) pairs is the
common design for this problem.
2010/7/8 "Alex J. G. Burzyński" :
> Hi,
>
> Is it possible to remove from search results the multivalued fields that
> don't pass the search criteria?
>
> My schema is defined as:
>
>
> required="
Hmm, did the default number of background merge threads change
sometime recently? I seem to recall so, but I can't find a reference
to it.
-Yonik
http://www.lucidimagination.com
(10/07/09 9:30), Peter Spam wrote:
Thanks for the note, Koji. However, hl.fragsize=0 seems to return the entire
document, rather than just one single line.
Here's what I tried (what I previously had was commented out):
regexv = "^.*$"
thequery = '/solr/select?facet=true&facet.limit=10&fl=id,s
On 7/8/10 8:55 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
> Hmm, did the default number of background merge threads change
> sometime recently? I seem to recall so, but I can't find a reference
> to it.
>
> -Yonik
> http://www.lucidimagination.com
It did change - from 3 to 1-3:
maxThreadCount = Math.max(1, Math.m
: However, the wiki recommends against using the ALIAS command in CoreAdmin in
: a couple of places, and SOLR-1637 says it's been removed now anyway.
correct, there were a lot of problems with how to cleanly/sanely deal with
core operations on aliases -- he command may return at some future date
: If you can use the latest branch_3x or trunk, hl.fragListBuilder=single
: is available that is for getting entire field contents with search terms
: highlighted. To use it, set hl.useFastVectorHighlighter to true.
He doesn't want the entire field -- his stored field values contain
multi-line s
Hi,
Thanks a lot for your reply.
As you suggested the best option is to have another core started up at same
/ different port and use shards for distributed search.
I had also thought of another approach where I would be writing the real
time data to both master and slave hence it will be avai
No, this second part will not work. Lucene creates new index files
independent of when and what you index. So copying files from one
indexer to another will never work: the indexes will be out of sync.
You don't have to change your UI to use distributed search. You can
add a new that fowards requ
Hello,
I would like to log the solr console. although solr logs requests in
timestamped format, this only logs the requests, i.e. does not log
number of hits for a given query, etc.
is there any easy way to do this other then reverting to methods for
capturing solr output. I usually run solr on m
Thanks a ton for your reply.. Your suggestion always helped me out :)
Your inputs on configuring shards via SOLR config would help us a lot!!!
One final question about replication.. When I initiate replication I thought
SOLR would delete the existing index in slave and just transfers the mas
36 matches
Mail list logo
