On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 1:09 PM, Rakhi Khatwani wrote:
> Hi,
>i wanted to query solr and send the output some reporting tool. has
> anyone done something like that? moreover, which reporting filter is good??
> ny suggesstions?
>
>
Can you be more specific on what you want to achieve? What
Not sure but a quick search turned up:
http://www.walkernews.net/2007/07/13/df-and-du-command-show-different-used-disk-space/
Using upto 2x the index size can happen. Also check if there is a
snapshooter script running through cron which is making hard links to files
while a merge is in progress.
hello
As I try to deploy my app on a tomcat server, I'd like to custome datadir
variable outside the solrconfig.xml file.
Is there a way to custom it in a context file?
Thanks
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/datadir-configuration-tp25782469p25782469.html
Sent from the So
Hi All,
I am new to Solr. I looking forward for Solr to index data that is
partitioned into multiple databases and tables and have questions
regarding dataconfig.xml. I have given the doubts at the end.
Lets say I have 3 mysql databases each with 3 tables.
Db1 : Tbl1, Tbl2, Tbl3
Db2 : Tbl1, Tbl2
Hi,
add JAVA_OPTS variable in TOMCAT_HOME/bin/catalina.sh like below,
JAVA_OPTS="$JAVA_OPTS -Dsolr.home=/opt/solr
-Dsolr.foo.data.dir=/opt/solr/data"
solr.data.dir must mapping to in solrconfig.xml
here is example (solrconfig.xml):
${solr.foo.data.dir:/default/path/to/datadir}
On Wed, Oct 7, 2
Hi All,
I am trying to get spell check suggestions in my distributed search query
using shards. I have 2 cores configured core0 and core1 both having spell
check component configured. On requesting search result using the following
query I don't get the spelling suggestions.
http://localhost:
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 4:33 PM, Chantal Ackermann <
chantal.ackerm...@btelligent.de> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> from reading through previous posts on that subject, it seems like the
> accent filter has to come before the snowball filter.
>
> I'd just like to make sure this is so. If it is the case, I'm
I'm not an expert on hit highlighting but please find some answers inline:
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 9:03 PM, Nourredine K. wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Can you please give me some answers for those questions :
>
> 1 - How can I get synonyms found for a keyword ?
>
> I mean i search "foo" and i have in my syn
we basically wanna generate PDF reports which contain, tag clouds, bar
charts, pie charts etc.
Regards,
Raakhi
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 1:28 PM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar <
shalinman...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 1:09 PM, Rakhi Khatwani
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >i wanted to query s
What do I put in
${solr.foo.data.dir:/default/path/to/datadir}
?
What is /default/path/to/datadir?
Gasol Wu wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> add JAVA_OPTS variable in TOMCAT_HOME/bin/catalina.sh like below,
> JAVA_OPTS="$JAVA_OPTS -Dsolr.home=/opt/solr
> -Dsolr.foo.data.dir=/opt/solr/data"
>
> solr.data.
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 2:19 AM, Giovanni Fernandez-Kincade <
gfernandez-kinc...@capitaliq.com> wrote:
>
> What does the "maxCommitsToKeep"(from SolrDeletionPolicy in SolrConfig.xml)
> parameter actually do? Increasing this value seems to have helped a little,
> but I'm wary of cranking it without
> I'm not an expert on hit highlighting but please find some answers inline:
Thanks Shalin for your answers. It helps a lot.
I post again questions #3 and #4 for the others :)
3 - Is it possible and if so How can I configure solR to set or not highlighting
for tokens with diacritics ?
Settin
Comments inline:
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 2:01 PM, Jayant Kumar Gandhi wrote:
>
> Lets say I have 3 mysql databases each with 3 tables.
>
> Db1 : Tbl1, Tbl2, Tbl3
> Db2 : Tbl1, Tbl2, Tbl3
> Db3 : Tbl1, Tbl2, Tbl3
>
> All databases have the same number of tables with same table names as
> shown abov
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 2:14 PM, balaji.a wrote:
>
> Hi All,
> I am trying to get spell check suggestions in my distributed search query
> using shards.
SpellCheckComponent does not support distributed search yet. There is an
issue open with a patch. If you decide to use, do let us know your f
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 2:51 PM, Rakhi Khatwani wrote:
> we basically wanna generate PDF reports which contain, tag clouds, bar
> charts, pie charts etc.
>
Faceting on a field will give you top terms and frequency information which
can be used to create tag clouds. What do you want to plot on a b
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 2:56 PM, clico wrote:
>
> What do I put in
> ${solr.foo.data.dir:/default/path/to/datadir}
> ?
>
> What is /default/path/to/datadir?
>
>
Solr variables are written like:
${variable_name:default_value}
If you are configuring the dataDir as an environment variable, you can
First, please do not cross-post messages to both solr-dev and solr-user.
Solr-dev is only for development related discussions.
Comments inline:
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 9:59 AM, Pravin Karne
wrote:
> Hi,
> I am new to solr. I have following queries :
>
>
> 1. Is solr work in distributed envi
Sorry, newbie here, figured it out.
How do you get spelling suggestions on a specific resultset, filtered by a
certain facet for example?
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 8:43 AM, R. Tan wrote:
> Nice. In comparison, how do you do it with faceting?
>
>> "Two other approaches are to use either the TermsC
>
> 4 - the same question for highlighting with lemmatisation?
> Settings for "manage" (all highlighted) ==> the two wordsmanage
> and
> "management" are highlighted
> Settings for "manage" ==> the first word "manage" is highlighted
> but
> not the second : "management"
>
There is no Lemmatisatio
I run solr successfully until i updated recently and dead at this line "where
ImportTime > '${dataimporter.last_index_time}'" from data-import.xml
i got this error
org.apache.solr.handler.dataimport.DataImportHandlerException: Unable to
execute query: select * from newheader where ImportTime > '
Just a friendly reminder to all about Lucene ecosystem events at
ApacheCon US this year. We have two days of talks on pretty much
every project under Lucene (see http://lucene.apache.org/#14+August+2009+-+Lucene+at+US+ApacheCon
) plus a meetup and a two day training on Lucene and a 1 day trai
> See http://markmail.org/message/hi25u5iqusfu542b
Thank you for the link, Shalin!
It could be worth copying that to the wiki?
Cheers!
Chantal
I'd just like to make sure this is so. If it is the case, I'm wondering
whether snowball filters for i.e. French process accented language
correctly,
Hi Pravin,
1. Is solr work in distributed environment ? if yes, how to configure it?
Yep. You can achieve this with Sharding.
For example: Install and Configure Solr on two machines and declare any one
of those as master. Insert shard parameters while you index and search your
data.
2. Is solr h
Thanks Shalin! I applied your patch and deployed the war. While debugging the
overridden method SpellCheckComponent.finishStage is not getting invoked by
the SearchHandler. Instead its invoking the SearchComponent.finishStage
method. Do I need to configure anything extra to make it work? My curre
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 3:53 PM, Mint Ekalak wrote:
>
> I run solr successfully until i updated recently and dead at this line
> "where
> ImportTime > '${dataimporter.last_index_time}'" from data-import.xml
>
> i got this error
>
> org.apache.solr.handler.dataimport.DataImportHandlerException: Una
Hi Jayant,
You can use Solr to achieve your objective.
The data-config.xml which you posted is incomplete.
I would like to suggest you a way to index the full data.
Try to index a database at a time. Sample xml conf.
Sorry! it was my mistake of not copying the war at correct location.
balaji.a wrote:
>
> Thanks Shalin! I applied your patch and deployed the war. While debugging
> the overridden method SpellCheckComponent.finishStage is not getting
> invoked by the SearchHandler. Instead its invoking the
> S
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 5:09 PM, Sandeep Tagore wrote:
>
> Hi Jayant,
> You can use Solr to achieve your objective.
> The data-config.xml which you posted is incomplete.
>
>
Sandeep, the data-config that Jayant posted is not incomplete. The
declaration is not necessary if the name of the column in
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 5:09 PM, Sandeep Tagore wrote:
>
> You can write an automated program which will change the DB conf details in
> that xml and fire the full import command. You can use
> http://localhost:8983/solr/dataimport url to check the status of the data
> import.
>
>
Also note that fu
Thanks Avlesh.
Now, I understand better how higtlighting works.
As you've said, since it is based on the analysers, higtlighting will handle
things like search.
A precision about #3 and #4 examples , they are exclusives : I wanted to know
how to do higtlighting with stemming OR without (not bo
Hi Elaine,
What do you mean by "index of this word".. do you want to return the first
occurrence of the word in that sentence or the document id.
Also which type of field is it? is it a Text or String? If that is of type
Text.. u can't achieve that because the sentence will be tokenized.
Sandeep
I tried this in my context.xml
It doesn't work
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/datadir-configuration-tp25782469p25783937.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
the jndi variables are not picked up for placeholder replacement.
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 5:44 PM, clico wrote:
>
> I tried this in my context.xml
> It doesn't work
> name="solr/home"
> type="java.lang.String"
> value="D:\workspace\solr\home"
>
Hi everybody
As I'm ready to deploy my solr server (after many tests and use cases)
I'd like ton configure my server in order that some request cannot be post
As an example :
My CMS or data app can use
- dataimport
- and other indexing commands
My website can only perform a search on the server
All,
We're puzzled why we're still unable to optimize a 192GB index on a LVM
volume that has 406GB available. We are not using Solr distribution.
There is no snapshooter in the picture. We run out of disk capacity with
a df showing 100% but a du showing just 379GB of files.
Restarting tomca
Here's a sample:
]>
In Mac OS X, how do I enable or disable the firewall?
Mac OS
Xallvisible includes
an easy-to-use firewallallvisible
that
can prevent potentially harmful incoming connections from other
computers. To turn it on or off:
Mac OS X 10.6 (Snow Leopard)
From the Ap
Here is what I discovered after dozens of reindexes. We have a tool that is
pulling all of the documents' uniqueIds. This tools is causing the cache to
fill up. We turned it off and the system was able to reindex.
Here is what is still puzzling to me about this entire scenario.
When we had onl
Hey PNW Clouders! I'd really like to chat further with the crew doing
distributed Solr. Give me a ring or shoot me an email, let's do lunch!
-Nick
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 2:10 PM, Nick Dimiduk wrote:
> As Bradford is out of town this evening, I will take up the mantel of
> Person-on-Point. Conta
Hi Sandeep,
Say the field Can you get what you
want?, the field type is Text.
My query contains 'sentence:"get what you"'. Is it possible to get
number 2 directly from a query since the word 'get' is the 2nd token
in the sentence?
Thanks.
Elaine
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 8:12 AM, Sandeep Tagore
Hi Elaine,
You can achieve that with some modifications in sol configuration files.
Generally text will be configured as
When a field is declared as text(with above conf.) it will tokenized. Say,
for example,
Chris Hostetter wrote:
: I would expect field:2001-03 to be a hit on a partial match such as
: field:[2001-02-28T00:00:00Z TO 2001-03-13T00:00:00Z]. I suppose that my
: expectation would be that field:2001-03 would be counted once per day for each
: day in its range. It would follow that a user
in a previous post, I asked how I would go about creating virtual function in
my solr query; ie: http://127.0.0.1:8994/solr/select...@myfunc(1,2,3,4)
I was trying to find a way to more easily/cleanly perform queries against
large numbers of dynamic fields (ie field1, field2, field3...field99).
I
Hello,
We are trying to debug an indexing/optimizing problem and have tried setting
the infoStream file in solrconf.xml so that the SolrIndexWriter will write a
log file. Here is our setting:
true
After making that change to solrconfig.xml, restarting Solr, we see a message
in the tomc
In a separate thread, I've detailed how an optimize is taking > 2x disk
space. We don't use solr distribution/snapshooter. We are using the
default deletion policy = 1. We can't optimize a 192G index in 400GB of
space.
This thread in lucene/java-user
http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/l
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 12:51 PM, Phillip Farber wrote:
>
> In a separate thread, I've detailed how an optimize is taking > 2x disk
> space. We don't use solr distribution/snapshooter. We are using the default
> deletion policy = 1. We can't optimize a 192G index in 400GB of space.
>
> This thread
Something like this, building on each character typed:
&facet=on&facet.field=tc_query&facet.prefix=be&facet.mincount=1
-Jay
http://www.lucidimagination.com
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 5:43 PM, R. Tan wrote:
> Nice. In comparison, how do you do it with faceting?
>
> > "Two other approaches are to u
Hello
I have a pb trying to retrieve a tree with facet use
I 've got a field location_field
Each doc in my index has a location_field
Location field can be
continent/country/city
I have 2 queries:
http://server/solr//select?fq=(location_field:NORTH*) : ok, retrieve docs
http://server/solr//s
It would be good to be able to commit without opening a new
reader however with Lucene 2.9 the segment readers for all
available segments are already created and available via
getReader which manages the reference counting internally.
Using reopen redundantly creates SRs that are already held
inte
I have no idea what "pb" mean but this is what you probably want -
fq=(location_field:(NORTH AMERICA*))
Cheers
Avlesh
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 10:40 PM, clico wrote:
>
> Hello
> I have a pb trying to retrieve a tree with facet use
>
> I 've got a field location_field
> Each doc in my index has a
Clico,
Because you are doing a wildcard query, the token 'AMERICA' will not be
analyzed at all. This means that 'AMERICA*' will NOT match 'america'.
On 10/07/2009 12:30 PM, Avlesh Singh wrote:
I have no idea what "pb" mean but this is what you probably want -
fq=(location_field:(NORTH AMERICA
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 10:45 PM, Jason Rutherglen <
jason.rutherg...@gmail.com> wrote:
> It would be good to be able to commit without opening a new
> reader however with Lucene 2.9 the segment readers for all
> available segments are already created and available via
> getReader which manages the
I think that argument requires auto commit to be on and opening readers
after the optimize starts? Otherwise, the optimized version is not put
into place until a commit is called, and a Reader won't see the newly
merged segments until then - so the original index is kept around in
either case - hav
I had the same problem. I'd be very interested to know how to get this
working...
-Gio.
-Original Message-
From: Burton-West, Tom [mailto:tburt...@umich.edu]
Sent: Wednesday, October 07, 2009 12:13 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: IndexWriter InfoStream in solrconfig not work
I'd like to have 5 cores on my box. core0 should automatically shard to
cores 1-4, which each have a quarter of my corpus.
I tried this in my solrconfig.xml:
${solr.core.shardsParam:}
and this in my solr.xml:
Unfortunately, this doesn't work, because cores
Yonik Seeley wrote:
Does this means that there's always a lucene IndexReader holding segment
files open so they can't be deleted during an optimize so we run out of disk
space > 2x?
Yes.
A feature could probably now be developed now that avoids opening a
reader until it's requested.
That wa
Aq
On 10/7/09, clico wrote:
>
> Hello
> I have a pb trying to retrieve a tree with facet use
>
> I 've got a field location_field
> Each doc in my index has a location_field
>
> Location field can be
> continent/country/city
>
>
> I have 2 queries:
>
> http://server/solr//select?fq=(location_
To be clear, the SRs created by merges don't have the term index
loaded which is the main cost. One would need to use
IndexReaderWarmer to load the term index before the new SR becomes a
part of SegmentInfos.
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 10:34 AM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar
wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at
Sandeep, I do get results when I search for "get what you", not 0 results.
What in my schema makes this difference?
I need to learn Solrj. I am cur
On 10/6/09 3:32 PM, "Chris Hostetter" wrote:
>
> : I ll try to explain with an example. Given the term 'it!' in the title, it
> : should match both 'it' and 'it!' in the query as an exact match. Currently,
> : this is done by using a synonym entry (and index time SynonymFilter) as
> : follow
Is this info available via admin page?
That's not a pb
I want to use that in order to drill down a tree
Christian Zambrano wrote:
>
> Clico,
>
> Because you are doing a wildcard query, the token 'AMERICA' will not be
> analyzed at all. This means that 'AMERICA*' will NOT match 'america'.
>
> On 10/07/2009 12:30 PM, Avlesh Singh w
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 1:50 PM, Phillip Farber wrote:
> So this implies that for a "normal" optimize, in every case, due to the
> Searcher holding open the existing segment prior to optimize that we'd
> always need 3x even in the normal case.
>
> This seems wrong since it is repeated stated that i
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 1:34 PM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar
wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 10:45 PM, Jason Rutherglen <
> jason.rutherg...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> It would be good to be able to commit without opening a new
>> reader however with Lucene 2.9 the segment readers for all
>> available segmen
Wow, this is weird. I commit before I optimize. In fact, I bounce
tomcat before I optimize just in case. It makse sense, as you say, that
then "the open reader can only be holding references to segments that
wouldn't be deleted until the optimize is complete anyway".
But we're still exceedin
Oops, send before finished. "Partial Optimize" aka "maxSegments" is a
recent Solr 1.4/Lucene 2.9 feature.
As to 2x v.s. 3x, the general wisdom is that an optimize on a "simple"
index takes at most 2x disk space, and on a "compound" index takes at
most 3x. "Simple" is the default (*). At Divvio we
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 3:16 PM, Phillip Farber wrote:
> Wow, this is weird. I commit before I optimize. In fact, I bounce tomcat
> before I optimize just in case. It makse sense, as you say, that then "the
> open reader can only be holding references to segments that wouldn't be
> deleted until
I can't tell why calling a commit or restarting is going to help
anything - or why you need more than 2x in any case. The only reason i
can see this being is if you have turned on auto-commit. Otherwise the
Reader is *always* only referencing what would have to be around anyway.
Your likely to jus
Okay - I think I've got you - your talking about the case of adding a
bunch of docs, not calling commit, and then trying to optimize. I keep
coming at it from a cold optimize. Making sense to me now.
Mark Miller wrote:
> I can't tell why calling a commit or restarting is going to help
> anything -
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 3:31 PM, Mark Miller wrote:
> I can't tell why calling a commit or restarting is going to help
> anything
Depends on what scenarios you consider, and what you are taking 2x of.
1) Open reader on index
2) Open writer and add two documents... the first causes a large
merge,
Hello all,
For those of you in the Bay Area, we will be demoing our Bodukai
Boutique product at the SF New Tech Meetup on Wednesday, Oct. 14:
http://sfnewtech.com/2009/10/05/1014-sf-new-tech-bodukai-yourversion-meehive-and-more/
Bodukai Boutique is the fastest ecommerce search and navigation
There are no security features in Solr 1.4. You cannot do this.
It would be really simple to implement a hack where all management
must be done via POST, and then allow the configuration to ban POST
requests.
On 10/7/09, clico wrote:
>
> Hi everybody
> As I'm ready to deploy my solr server (afte
The BIRT project can do what you want. It has a nice form creator and
you can configure http XML input formats.
It includes very complete Eclipse plugins and there is a book about it.
On 10/7/09, Shalin Shekhar Mangar wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 2:51 PM, Rakhi Khatwani wrote:
>
>> we basic
Yonik Seeley wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 3:31 PM, Mark Miller wrote:
>
>> I can't tell why calling a commit or restarting is going to help
>> anything
>>
>
> Depends on what scenarios you consider, and what you are taking 2x of.
>
> 1) Open reader on index
> 2) Open writer and add two
2 things I noticed that are different from 1.3 to 1.4 for DataImport:
1. there are now 2 datetime values (per my specific schema I'm sure) in the
dataimport.properties vs. only 1 in 1.3 (using the exact same schema). One
is 'last_index_time' same as 1.3, and a *new* one (in 1.4) named
item.last_
Hi again, I'm gonna try this again with more focus this time :D
1) Ideally what we would like to do, is plug in an additional mechanism to
filter the initial result set, because we can't find a way to implement our
filtering needs as filter queries against a single index. We would want to do
t
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 3:56 PM, Mark Miller wrote:
> I guess you can't guarantee 2x though, as if you have queries coming in
> that take a while, a commit opening a new Reader will not guarantee the
> old Reader is quite ready to go away. Might want to wait a short bit
> after the commit.
Right -
On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 1:38 AM, michael8 wrote:
>
> 2 things I noticed that are different from 1.3 to 1.4 for DataImport:
>
> 1. there are now 2 datetime values (per my specific schema I'm sure) in the
> dataimport.properties vs. only 1 in 1.3 (using the exact same schema). One
> is 'last_index_
You should also separate your indexer from your searcher and make the
searcher request handlers allow search only (remove the handlers you
don't need). You could also lock down the request parameters that
they take, too, by using invariants, etc.
Have a look in your solrconfig.xml. You co
The separate sku do not become one long text string. They are separate
values in the same field. The relevance calculation is completely
separate per value.
The performance problem with the field collapsing patch is that it
does the same thing as a facet or sorting operation: it does a sweep
throu
We are having some issues with our solr parent application not retrieving
records as expected.
For example, if the input query includes a colon (e.g. hot and cold:
temperatures), the relevant record (which contains a colon in the same place)
does not get retrieved; if the input query does not i
Could you please provide the exact URL of a query where you are
experiencing this problem?
eg(Not URL encoded): q=fieldName:"hot and cold: temperatures"
On 10/07/2009 05:32 PM, Bernadette Houghton wrote:
We are having some issues with our solr parent application not retrieving
records as expec
Thanks guys. Now I can easily search thru 10TB of my personal photos,
videos, music and other stuff :)
At some point I had split them into multiple db and tables and inserts
to a single db/ table were taking too much time once the index grew
beyond 1gig. I was storing all the possible metadata abo
Hi Christian, try this one - http://www.deakin.edu.au/dro/view/DU:3601
Either scroll down and click one of the "television broadcasting -- asia"
links, or type it in the Quick Search box.
TIA
bern
-Original Message-
From: Christian Zambrano [mailto:czamb...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thurs
i've enabled the snapshooter to run after commit and it's working fine until
i've added a spellchecker with
buildOnCommit = true... Any idea why? Thanks
solr/bin/snapshooter
.
true
arg1 arg2
MYVAR=val1
snapshooter
solr/bin
Correct me if I'm wrong, but wasn't the ISOLatin1AccentFilterFactory
deprecated in favor of:
in 1.4?
-Jay
http://www.lucidimagination.com
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 1:44 AM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar <
shalinman...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 4:33 PM, Chantal Ackermann <
> chantal.
No, ISOLatin1AccentFilterFactory is not deprecated.
You can use either MappingCharFilterFactory+mapping-ISOLatin1Accent.txt
or ISOLatin1AccentFilterFactory whichever you'd like.
Koji
Jay Hill wrote:
Correct me if I'm wrong, but wasn't the ISOLatin1AccentFilterFactory
deprecated in favor of:
Bern,
I am interested on the solr query. In other words, the query that your
system sends to solr.
Thanks,
Christian
On Oct 7, 2009, at 5:56 PM, Bernadette Houghton > wrote:
Hi Christian, try this one - http://www.deakin.edu.au/dro/view/DU:3601
Either scroll down and click one of t
Use http://solr-url/solr/admin/analysis.jsp to see how your data is
indexed/queried
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Problems-with-WordDelimiterFilterFactory-tp25795589p25797377.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Work like a charm !!
thanks Shalin
Regards,
Mint
Shalin Shekhar Mangar wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 1:38 AM, michael8 wrote:
>
>>
>> 2 things I noticed that are different from 1.3 to 1.4 for DataImport:
>>
>> 1. there are now 2 datetime values (per my specific schema I'm sure) in
>
Thanks Jay. What's a good way of extracting the original text from here?
On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 1:03 AM, Jay Hill wrote:
> Something like this, building on each character typed:
>
> &facet=on&facet.field=tc_query&facet.prefix=be&facet.mincount=1
>
> -Jay
> http://www.lucidimagination.com
>
>
> O
Hi,
How can I get wildcard search (e.g. cha*) to score documents based on the
position of the keyword in a field? Closer (to the start) means higher
score.
For example, I have multiple documents with titles containing the word
"champion". Some of the document titles start with the word "champion"
Are you referring to schema info ???
You can find it at http://192.168.5.25/solr/admin/file/?file=schema.xml and
http://192.168.5.25/solr/admin/schema.jsp
Fishman, Vladimir wrote:
>
> Is this info available via admin page?
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/How-to-ret
You would need to boost your "startswith" matches artificially for the
desired behavior.
I would do it this way -
1. Create a KeywordTokenized field with n-gram filter.
2. Create a Whitespace tokenized field with n-gram flter.
3. Search on both the fields, boost matches for #1 over #2.
H
Elaine,
The field type text contains in its definition. So all the
sentences that are indexed / queried will be split in to words. So when you
search for 'get what you', you will get sentences containing get, what, you,
get what, get you, what you, get what you. So when you try to find the
indexO
Hi Rihaed,
I guess we don't need to depend on scores all the times.
You can use custom sort to sort the results. Take a dynamicField, fill it
with indexOf(keyword) value, sort the results by the field in ascending
order. Then the records which contain the keyword at the earlier position
will come
>
> I guess we don't need to depend on scores all the times.
> You can use custom sort to sort the results. Take a dynamicField, fill it
> with indexOf(keyword) value, sort the results by the field in ascending
> order. Then the records which contain the keyword at the earlier position
> will come
thanks for your reply
but sorry for the delay
as you said i have removed the commit while adding single document and set
the auto commit for
200
1
after setting when i run optimize() manually the size decreased to
350MB(10 docs) from 638MB(10 docs)
i think this happene
Hi Bern,
I indexed some records with - and : today using your configuration and I
searched with following urls
http://localhost/solr/select?q=CONTENT:"cold : temperature"
http://localhost/solr/select?q=CONTENT:"cold: temperature"
http://localhost/solr/select?q=CONTENT:"cold :temperature"
http://lo
I will try this out. How does 1 and 2 boost the my startswith query? Is it
because of the n-gram filter?
On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 1:29 PM, Avlesh Singh wrote:
> You would need to boost your "startswith" matches artificially for the
> desired behavior.
> I would do it this way -
>
> 1. Create a
This might work and I also have a single value field which makes it cleaner.
Can sort be customized (with indexOf()) from the solr parameters alone?
Thanks!
On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 1:40 PM, Sandeep Tagore wrote:
>
> Hi Rihaed,
> I guess we don't need to depend on scores all the times.
> You can
1 - 100 of 103 matches
Mail list logo
