I want to know the maximum no of cores supported by Solr. 1000s or may be
millions all under one solr instance ?
Also I want to know how to redirect a particular query to a particular core.
Actually I'm querying solr from Ajax, so I think there must be some request
parameter that says which core we
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/CoreAdmin
Best regards,
Shishir
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 1:58 PM, KK wrote:
> I want to know the maximum no of cores supported by Solr. 1000s or may be
> millions all under one solr instance ?
> Also I want to know how to redirect a particular query to a particular
> c
there is no hard limit on the no:of cores. it is limited by your
system's ability to open files and the resources.
the queries are automatically sent to appropriate core if your url is
htt://host:port//select
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 1:58 PM, KK wrote:
> I want to know the maximum no of cores sup
Hi
Yes I'd like the document deleted from Solr and yes, there is a unique
document id field in Solr.
Regards
Andrew
Andrew
2009/5/13 Fergus McMenemie :
>>Hi
>>
>>Is it possible, through dataimport handler to remove an existing
>>document from the Solr index?
>>
>>I import/update from my databas
I was wondering if there is an interest in a UK (South East) solr user
group meeting
Please let me know if you are interested. I am happy to organize.
Regards,
Colin
>I was wondering if there is an interest in a UK (South East) solr user
>group meeting
>
>Please let me know if you are interested. I am happy to organize.
>
>Regards,
>
>Colin
Yes Very interested. I am in lincolnshire.
--
===
Fergus
>Hi
>
>Yes I'd like the document deleted from Solr and yes, there is a unique
>document id field in Solr.
>
I that case try the following. Create a field in the entity:-
Notes.
1) the entity is assumed to have name="jc".
2) the uniqueKey field is assumed to called "id".
Thank you very much. Got the point.
One off the track question, can we automate the creation of new cores[it
requires manually editing the solr.xml file as I know, and what about the
location of core index directory, do we need to point that manually as
well].
After going through the wiki what I fo
Hi all,
I am also facing the same issue where autocommit blocks all
other requests. I having around 1,00,000 documents with average size of
100K each. It took more than 20 hours to index.
I have currently set autocommit maxtime to 7 seconds, mergeFactor to 25.
Do I need more configuration
Ok so the VIP will point to the new master. but what makes a slave promoted
to a master? Only the fact that it will receive add/update requests?
And I suppose that this "hot" promotion is possible only if the slave is
convigured as master also...
2009/5/14 Noble Paul നോബിള് नोब्ळ्
> ideally , w
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 12:33 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
> I've contacted
> others in the past who have done "comparisons" and after one round of
> emailing it was almost always clear that they didn't know what best
> practices are for any given product and thus were doing things
> sub-optimally.
>
>
> My most recent example of this is BooleanQuery's performance. It
> turns out, if you setAllowDocsOutOfOrder(true), it yields a sizable
> performance gain (27% on my most recent test) for OR queries.
>
Mike,
Can you please point me to some information concerning allowDocsOutOfOrder?
What's
Hello List,
I need to search the multiple values from the same field. I am having the
following syntax
I am thinking of the first option. Can anyone tell me which one is correct
syntax?
Q=+title:=test +site_id:="22 3000676 566644"
Q=+title:=test +site_id:=22 3000676 566644
Q
20+ hours? I index 3 million records in 3 hours. Is your auto commit
causing a snapshot? What do you have listed in the events.
Jack
On 5/14/09, Gargate, Siddharth wrote:
> Hi all,
> I am also facing the same issue where autocommit blocks all
> other requests. I having around 1,00,000 do
Does anyone know if there is still a bug in date fields? I'm having a
problem boosting documents by date in solr 1.3
Thank,
Jack
--
Sent from my mobile device
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 5:20 PM, Radha C. wrote:
> I need to search the multiple values from the same field. I am having the
> following syntax
>
> I am thinking of the first option. Can anyone tell me which one is correct
> syntax?
>
> Q=+title:=test +site_id:="22 3000676 566644"
>
> Q=+ti
Thanks for your reply.
Yes by mistaken I added := in place of ":" . The title should match and the
site_id should match any of these 23243455 , 245, 3457676 .
_
From: Shalin Shekhar Mangar [mailto:shalinman...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2009 5:43 PM
To: solr-use
In that case, the following will work:
q=+title:test +site_id:(23243455 245 3457676)
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 5:35 PM, Radha C. wrote:
> Thanks for your reply.
>
>
>
> Yes by mistaken I added := in place of ":" . The title should match and the
> site_id should match any of these 23243455 , 2
oh, so the configuration must be manualy changed?
Can't something be passed at (re)start time?
>
> 2009/5/14 Noble Paul നോബിള് नोब्ळ्
>
>> On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 4:07 PM, nk 11 wrote:
>> > Ok so the VIP will point to the new master. but what makes a slave
>> promoted
>> > to a master? Only t
Totally agree on optimizing out of the box experience, it's just never
a one size fits all thing. And we have to be very careful about micro-
benchmarks driving these settings. Currently, many of us use
Wikipedia, but that's just one doc set and I'd venture to say most
Solr users do not ha
yeah there is a hack
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1154?focusedCommentId=12708316&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels%3Acomment-tabpanel#action_12708316
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 6:07 PM, nk 11 wrote:
> sorry for the mail. I wanted to hit reply :(
>
> On Thu, May 14, 2
I like Grant's suggestion as the simplest solution.
As for XML merging and XSLT, I really wouldn't want to go that route
personally, but one solution that comes close to that is to template
web.xml with some substitution tags and use Ant's ability to replace
tokens. So we could put in @FIL
Solr already supports this .
please refer this
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/CoreAdmin#head-7ca1b98a9df8b8ca0dcfbfc49940ed5ac98c4a08
ensure that your solr.xml is persistent
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/CoreAdmin#head-7508c24c6e2dadad2dfea39b2fba045062481da8
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 3:43 PM, KK wrote
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 06:47:01AM -0400, Michael McCandless wrote:
> While I agree, one should properly match & tune all apps they are
> testing (for a fair comparison), we in turn must set out-of-the-box
> defaults (in Lucene and Solr) that get you as close to the "best
> practices" as possible.
wow! that was just a couple of days old!
thanks as lot!
2009/5/14 Noble Paul നോബിള് नोब्ळ्
> yeah there is a hack
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1154?focusedCommentId=12708316&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels%3Acomment-tabpanel#action_12708316
>
> On Thu, May
Siddharth,
The settings you have in your solrconfig for ramBufferSizeMB and
maxBufferedDocs control how much memory may be used during indexing besides
any overhead with the documents being "in-flight" at a given moment
(deserialized into memory but not yet handed to lucene). There are
streaming
Indexing speed comes down to a lot of factors. The settings as talked about
above, VM settings, the size of the documents, how many are sent at a time,
how active you can keep the indexer (i.e. one thread sending documents lets
the indexer relax whereas N threads keeps pressure on the indexer), h
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 6:51 AM, Andrey Klochkov
wrote:
> Can you please point me to some information concerning allowDocsOutOfOrder?
> What's this at all?
There is this cryptic static setter (in Lucene):
BooleanQuery.setAllowDocsOutOfOrder(boolean)
It defaults to false, which means BooleanS
Hi.
I am indexing a PDF document with the ExtractingRequestHandler. My curl
post has a URL like:
../solr/update/extract?ext.idx.attr=true&ext.def.fl=text&ext.literal.id=123&ext.literal.author=Somebody
Sure enough I see in the server logs:
params={ext.def.fl=text&ext.literal.id=123&ext.idx.att
Thank you very much. LOL, Its in the same wiki I was told to go through.
I've a question regarding creating ofsolr cores on the fly. The wiki says,
.Creates a new core and register it. If persistence is enabled
(persist=true), the configuration for this new core will be saved in
'solr.xml'. If
I found a very elegant (I think) solution to this.
I'll post a patch today or tomorrow.
Best,
-Jacob
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 6:22 PM, Erik Hatcher
wrote:
> I like Grant's suggestion as the simplest solution.
>
> As for XML merging and XSLT, I really wouldn't want to go that route
> personally,
what does /admin/luke show for fields and terms in the fields?
On May 14, 2009, at 10:03 AM, rossputin wrote:
Hi.
I am indexing a PDF document with the ExtractingRequestHandler. My
curl
post has a URL like:
../solr/update/extract?
ext
.idx
.attr
=true&ext.def.fl=text&ext.literal.id=1
There is no reference to the author field I am trying to set.. I am using the
latest nightly download.
-- Ross
Grant Ingersoll-6 wrote:
>
> what does /admin/luke show for fields and terms in the fields?
>
> On May 14, 2009, at 10:03 AM, rossputin wrote:
>
>>
>> Hi.
>>
>> I am indexing a PDF
Do you have an author field in your schema?
On May 14, 2009, at 10:31 AM, rossputin wrote:
There is no reference to the author field I am trying to set.. I am
using the
latest nightly download.
-- Ross
Grant Ingersoll-6 wrote:
what does /admin/luke show for fields and terms in the fiel
There is now, thanks for your help. On the same topic.. is there a best
practice for modifying schema, in a future-proof way ?
-- Ross
Grant Ingersoll-6 wrote:
>
> Do you have an author field in your schema?
>
> On May 14, 2009, at 10:31 AM, rossputin wrote:
>
>>
>> There is no reference
Hi Grant, thanks for the reply.
Is the logic for a function query that calculates distances that Yonik
mentioned (gdist(position,101.2,234.3))
already implemented?
This could be either very inaccurate or load intense.
If the logic isn't done until now maybe I can prepare it.
Norman
-Ursp
Yonik Seeley-2 wrote:
>
> It's probably the case that every search engine out there is faster
> than Solr at one thing or another, and that Solr is faster or better
> at some other things.
>
> I prefer to spend my time improving Solr rather than engage in
> benchmarking wars... and Solr 1.4 wi
What is the difference between EmbeddedSolrServer and CommonsHttpSolrServer.
Which is the preferred server to use?
In some blog i read that EmbeddedSolrServer is 50% faster than
CommonsHttpSolrServer,then why do we need to use CommonsHttpSolrServer.
Can anyone please guide me the right path/way
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1167
-Bryan
On May 13, 2009, at May 13, 7:20 PM, Otis Gospodnetic wrote:
Bryan, maybe it's time to stick this in JIRA?
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/HowToContribute
Thanks,
Otis
--
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
I was intending to make an entry to the 'Powered by Solr' page, so I
created a Wiki account and logged in. When I go to that page, it
shows it as being 'immutable', which I take as meaning I can't edit
it. Is there someone I can send the information to who can do the
edit? Or perhaps there is so
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 1:54 PM, Terence Gannon wrote:
> I was intending to make an entry to the 'Powered by Solr' page, so I
> created a Wiki account and logged in. When I go to that page, it
> shows it as being 'immutable', which I take as meaning I can't edit
> it.
Did you try hitting refresh
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 9:07 AM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
> Richard Feynman:
>
>"...if you're doing an experiment, you should report everything that you
>think might make it invalid - not only what you think is right about it:
>other causes that could possibly explain your results; and t
I don't know if field type has any impact on the memory usage - does it?
Our use cases require complete matches, thus there is no need of any
analysis in most cases - does it matter in terms of memory usage?
Also, is there any default caching used by Solr if I comment out all
the caches under que
> Did you try hitting refresh on your browser after you logged in?
Wow, I really should have known that...thank you for your patient reply, Yonik.
Regards...Terence
When using solr 1.4 replication, I see that the lucene-write.lock file
is being replicated to slaves. I'm importing data from a db every 5
minutes using cron to trigger a DIH delta-import. Replication polls
every 60 seconds and the master is configured to take a snapshot
(replicateAfter
CommonsHttpSolrServer is how you access Solr from a Java client via
HTTP. You can connect to a Solr running anywhere
EmbeddedSolrServer starts up Solr internally, and connects directly,
all in a single JVM... Embedded may be faster, the jury is out, but
you have to have your Solr ser
right -- which one you pick will depend more on your runtime
environment then anything else.
If you need to hit a server (on a different machine)
CommonsHttpSolrServer is your only option.
If you are running an embedded application -- where your custom code
lives in the same JVM as solr -
On 14-May-09, at 9:46 AM, gdeconto wrote:
Solr is very fast even with 1.3 and the developers have done an
incredible
job.
However, maybe the next Solr improvement should be the creation of a
configuration manager and/or automated tuning tool. I know that
optimizing
Solr performance can
Some update on this issue,
1) I attached jconsole to my app and monitored the memory usage.
During indexing the memory usage goes up and down, which I think is
normal. The memory remains around the min heap size (4 G) for
indexing, but as soon as I run a search the tenured heap usage jumps
up to 6
Michael McCandless wrote:
So why haven't we enabled this by default, already?
Why isn't Lucene done already :)
- Mark
I have two questions:
1) How do I search for ALL items? For example, I provide a sort query
parameter of "updated" and a rows query parameter of 10 to limit the
query results. I still have to provide a search query, of course. What
if I want to provide a list of ALL results that match this?
Oh, one more question
3) Is there a way to effectively do a GROUP BY? For example, if I have
a document that has a photoID attached to it, is there a way to return
a set of results that does not duplicate the photoID field?
Thanks,
Chris Miller
ServerMotion
www.servermotion.com
On M
rossputin wrote:
Hi.
I am indexing a PDF document with the ExtractingRequestHandler. My curl
post has a URL like:
../solr/update/extract?ext.idx.attr=true&ext.def.fl=text&ext.literal.id=123&ext.literal.author=Somebody
Sure enough I see in the server logs:
params={ext.def.fl=text&ext.literal.
800 million docs is on the high side for modern hardware.
If even one field has norms on, your talking almost 800 MB right there.
And then if another Searcher is brought up well the old one is serving
(which happens when you update)? Doubled.
Your best bet is to distribute across a couple mac
I think you will want to look at the Field Collapsing patch for this. http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-236
.
Thanks,
Matt Weber
eSr Technologies
http://www.esr-technologies.com
On May 14, 2009, at 5:52 PM, Chris Miller wrote:
Oh, one more question
3) Is there a way to effec
Thanks Mark.
I checked all the items you mentioned,
1) I've omitnorms=true for all my indexed fields (stored only fields I
guess doesn't matter)
2) I've tried commenting out all caches in the solrconfig.xml, but
that doesn't help much
3) I've tried commenting out the first and new searcher listen
56 matches
Mail list logo
